# AD 96-24-16: Tooling Holes In Firewalls - Type: Airworthiness directive - Status: Historical - Products: Hawker Beechcraft BAe.125 Series 800A, Hawker 800, Hawker 800 (U-125A) and Hawker 800XP - Effective: January 27, 1997 - Published: December 19, 1996, 61 FR 66878–66879 - Issued as: Final rule - Superseded by: [AD 2000-08-07](https://openairdocs.org/ad/2000-08-07) - Product type: Aircraft, Large airplane - Amendment: 39-9840 - Docket: 96-NM-136-AD - Registered aircraft: 368 may be affected, by airframe or engine model (OpenAirDocs) - Official PDF: https://openairdocs.org/files/sha256/e7/23/e7232679372ed417827ce1edf91cd58359263370e19d5777739a05d52fc2cb9d (from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1996-12-19/pdf/96-30569.pdf) - Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/1996/12/19/96-30569/airworthiness-directives-raytheon-model-bae-125-800a-model-hawker-800-and-model-hawker-800xp-series - FAA DRS: https://drs.faa.gov/browse/excelExternalWindow/7395FD1D6EA5F79C86256A0900730727.0001 - DRS record last changed: August 7, 2025 - Page: https://openairdocs.org/ad/96-24-16 ## Summary This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Raytheon Model BAe 125-800A, Model Hawker 800, and Model Hawker 800XP series airplanes, that requires the filling of two tooling holes on the firewalls of the left and right engine pylons with sealant. This amendment is prompted by notification from the manufacturer that these holes were not sealed during production. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent an engine fire from moving to the fuselage and to the lines that carry flammable fluid that are located inboard of the firewall. ## The airworthiness directive 96-24-16 RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Formerly Beech, Raytheon Corporate Jets, British Aerospace, Hawker Siddley, et al.): Amendment 39-9840. Docket 96-NM-136-AD. Applicability: Model BAe 125-800A series airplanes, Model Hawker 800 series airplanes including Special Variants (C29A, U125, and U125A), and Model Hawker 800XP series airplanes; on which the modification described in Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.54-1-3815B, or a production equivalent, has not been installed; certificated in any category. NOTE 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD. Therequest should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it. NOTE 2: Raytheon Model BAe 125-800B series airplanes are similar in design to the airplanes that are subject to the requirements of this AD and, therefore, may also be subject to the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, however, this model is not type certificated for operation in the United States. Airworthiness authorities of countries in which the Model BAe 125-800B series airplanes are approved for operation should consider adopting corrective action, applicable to this model, that is similar to the corrective action required by this AD. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To prevent an engine fire from moving to the fuselage and flammable fluid carrying lines located inboard of the firewalls on the left and right engine pylons, accomplish the following: (a) Within six months after the effective date of this AD, fill the two, unused (open) tooling holes in the firewalls of the left and right engine pylons, in accordance with Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.54-1-3815B, dated March 26, 1996. (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Small Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Wichita ACO. NOTE 3: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Wichita ACO. (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. (d) The action shall be done in accordance with Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.54-1-3815B, dated March 26, 1996. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Raytheon Aircraft Company, Manager Service Engineering, Hawker Customer Support Department, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Wichita ACO, Small Airplane Directorate, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. (e) This amendment becomes effective on January 27, 1997. ## Rule preamble ### Supplementary information A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Raytheon Model BAe 125-800A, Model Hawker 800, and Model Hawker 800XP series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on September 4, 1996 (61 FR 46574). That action proposed to require the filling of the two, unused (open) holes in the firewall of each engine pylon. Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public. Conclusion The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed. Cost Impact There are approximately 286 Model BAe 125-800A, Model Hawker 800, and Model Hawker 800XP series airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 170 airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $20,400, or $120 per airplane. The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted. Regulatory Impact The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES." List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows: PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 39.13 - [Amended] 2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive: ## Affected data sheets (1) (OpenAirDocs) The type certificate data sheets whose models the AD names. - [TCDS A3EU](https://openairdocs.org/tcds/A3EU): Textron Aviation Inc.; names 3 of 50 models: BAe.125 Series 800A (U-125), Hawker 800 (U-125A), Hawker 800XP ## Registered aircraft it may apply to (OpenAirDocs) Matched by airframe and engine model; the AD's applicability may narrow it by serial number, part number or equipment. - Aircraft: 368 (368 by airframe model, 0 by engine model) - Makers: Raytheon 253, British Aerospace 66, Raytheon Corporate Jets 40, Corporate Jets 8, Hawker Beechcraft 1 Models with the most aircraft: - [Raytheon HAWKER 800XP](https://openairdocs.org/model/raytheon-hawker-800xp): 251 aircraft (airframe model) - [British Aerospace BAE 125 SERIES 800A](https://openairdocs.org/model/british-aerospace-bae-125-series-800a): 61 aircraft (airframe model) - [Raytheon Corporate Jets HAWKER 800XP](https://openairdocs.org/model/raytheon-corporate-jets-hawker-800xp): 23 aircraft (airframe model) - [Raytheon Corporate Jets HAWKER 800](https://openairdocs.org/model/raytheon-corporate-jets-hawker-800): 9 aircraft (airframe model) - [Corporate Jets BAE 125-800A](https://openairdocs.org/model/corporate-jets-bae-125-800a): 8 aircraft (airframe model) - [Raytheon Corporate Jets BAE 125-800A](https://openairdocs.org/model/raytheon-corporate-jets-bae-125-800a): 8 aircraft (airframe model) - [British Aerospace BAE 125-800A](https://openairdocs.org/model/british-aerospace-bae-125-800a): 5 aircraft (airframe model) - [Raytheon BAE 125-800A](https://openairdocs.org/model/raytheon-bae-125-800a): 2 aircraft (airframe model) - [Hawker Beechcraft HAWKER 800XP](https://openairdocs.org/model/hawker-beechcraft-hawker-800xp): 1 aircraft (airframe model) All 10 models: https://openairdocs.org/ad/96-24-16/models.md Every aircraft: https://openairdocs.org/ad/96-24-16/aircraft.md ## Related documents - [AD 2000-08-07](https://openairdocs.org/ad/2000-08-07): Tooling Holes · Textron BAe.125 Series 800A, BAe.125 Series 800B, Hawker 800 and 1 more. Effective May 31, 2000. Supersedes this AD - [Proposed rule 96-NM-136-AD](https://openairdocs.org/proposed/96-NM-136-AD): Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), published Sep 4, 1996 Its text cites no advisory circulars or STCs. --- OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.