# AD 98-14-11: Main Landing Gear Lock Bolt For Pintle Pin - Type: Airworthiness directive - Status: Historical - Products: Airbus Industrie A319 Model -111, A319 Model -112, A319 Model -113, A319 Model -114, A319 Model -131, A319 Model -132, A320 Model -111, A320 Model -211, A320 Model -212, A320 Model -214, A320 Model -231, A320 Model -232 and 6 more - Effective: August 12, 1998 - Published: July 8, 1998, 63 FR 36834–36835 - Issued as: Final rule - Superseded by: [AD 2000-10-16](https://openairdocs.org/ad/2000-10-16) - Product type: Aircraft, Large airplane - Amendment: 39-10644 - Docket: 98-NM-93-AD - Official PDF: https://openairdocs.org/files/sha256/cf/ca/cfca070caf577dfa415dec7fb660a315f661e309e32399f7d2d1f4c176a2f9e7 (from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1998-07-08/pdf/98-17911.pdf) - Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/1998/07/08/98-17911/airworthiness-directives-airbus-model-a319-a320-and-a321-series-airplanes - FAA DRS: https://drs.faa.gov/browse/excelExternalWindow/10CF65A91ACCEFD0862569740045CE3C.0001 - DRS record last changed: August 7, 2025 - Page: https://openairdocs.org/ad/98-14-11 ## Summary This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes, that requires repetitive inspections for discrepancies of the lock bolt for the pintle pin on the main landing gear (MLG), and follow-on corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct a rotated, damaged, or missing lock bolt, which could result in disengagement of the pintle pin from the bearing, and consequent collapse of the MLG during landing. ## The airworthiness directive 98-14-11 AIRBUS INDUSTRIE: Amendment 39-10644. Docket 98-NM-93-AD. Applicability: All Model A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes; certificated in any category. NOTE 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To detect and correct a rotated, damaged, or missing lock bolt, which could result in disengagement of the pintle pin from the bearing, and consequent collapse of the main landing gear (MLG) during landing, accomplish the following: (a) Perform a detailed visual inspection to detect discrepancies (rotation, damage, and absence) of the lock bolt for the pintle pin on the MLG, in accordance with Airbus All Operator Telex (AOT) 32-17, Revision 01, dated November 6, 1997, at the latest of the times specified in paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2), and (a)(3), of this AD. If any discrepancy is detected, prior to further flight, perform corrective actions, as applicable, in accordance with the AOT. Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,000 flight cycles or 15 months, whichever occurs first. (1) Within 30 months since the airplane's date of manufacture or prior to the accumulation of 2,000 total flight cycles, whichever occurs first. (2) Within 15 months or 1,000 flight cycles after the last gear replacement or accomplishment of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1119, Revision 1, dated June 13, 1994, whichever occurs first. (3) Within 500 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD. (b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their request through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116. NOTE 2: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116. (c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. (d) The actions shall be done in accordance with Airbus All Operator Telex (AOT) 32-17, Revision 01, dated November 6, 1997. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. NOTE 3: The subject of this AD is addressed in French airworthiness directive 97-385- 112(B), dated December 17, 1997. (e) This amendment becomes effective on August 12, 1998. ## Rule preamble ### Supplementary information A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to all Airbus Model A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on May 12, 1998 (63 FR 26111). That action proposed to require repetitive inspections for discrepancies of the lock bolt for the pintle pin on the main landing gear (MLG), and follow-on corrective actions, if necessary. Comments Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to the comments received. The commenters support the proposed rule. Explanation of Changes Made to This Final Rule In the proposal, the FAA inadvertently omitted reference to Revision 1, dated June 13, 1994, of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-32-1119. Therefore, the FAA has revised the final rule accordingly. Conclusion After careful review of the available data, including the comments noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule with the change previously described. The FAA has determined that this change will neither increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD. Interim Action This is considered to be interim action until final action is identified, at which time the FAA may consider further rulemaking. Cost Impact The FAA estimates that 120 airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD. It will take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish the required inspection, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the inspection required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $7,200, or $60 per airplane, per inspection cycle. The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted. Regulatory Impact The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES." List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows: PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 39.13 [Amended] 2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive: ## Registered aircraft it may apply to (OpenAirDocs) No registered aircraft matched the models it names. ## Related documents - [AD 2000-10-16](https://openairdocs.org/ad/2000-10-16) (historical): Main Landing Gear (MLG) · Airbus A321 Series (all). Effective Jun 30, 2000. Supersedes this AD - [Proposed rule 98-NM-93-AD](https://openairdocs.org/proposed/98-NM-93-AD): Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), published May 12, 1998 Its text cites no advisory circulars or STCs. --- OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.