# AD 98-23-15: Fuel Feed Hose Assemblies - Type: Airworthiness directive - Status: Current - Products: Textron Hawker 800XP - Effective: December 18, 1998 - Published: November 13, 1998, 63 FR 63396–63397 - Issued as: Final rule - Superseded by: Nothing supersedes this AD - Product type: Aircraft, Large airplane - Amendment: 39-10883 - Docket: 98-NM-195-AD - Registered aircraft: 275 may be affected, by airframe or engine model (OpenAirDocs) - Official PDF: https://openairdocs.org/files/sha256/db/12/db126a30e5954d67f471ce43c953eefb84ff7be522251cb3e6b180dd04a56fe0 (from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-1998-11-13/pdf/98-30168.pdf) - Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/1998/11/13/98-30168/airworthiness-directives-raytheon-model-hawker-800xp-series-airplanes - FAA DRS: https://drs.faa.gov/browse/excelExternalWindow/E55AD09BF6F30B5486256A090075EB1D.0001 - DRS record last changed: January 21, 2026 - Page: https://openairdocs.org/ad/98-23-15 ## Summary This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP series airplanes, that requires replacement of the fuel feed hose assemblies of the auxiliary power unit (APU) with new hose assemblies. This amendment is prompted by a report of the collapse of the inner casing of the fuel feed hose that supplies fuel to the APU. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of the fuel feed hose assemblies, which could result in fuel leakage and consequent risk of fire in the aft equipment bay. ## The airworthiness directive 98-23-15 RAYTHEON AIRCRAFT COMPANY (Formerly Beech): Amendment 39-10883. Docket 98-NM-195-AD. Applicability: Model Hawker 800XP series airplanes, serial numbers 258297 through 258304 inclusive, and 258307 through 258309 inclusive; certificated in any category. NOTE 1: This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it. Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously. To prevent failure of the fuel feed hose assemblies, which could result in fuel leakage and consequent risk of fire in the aft equipment bay, accomplish the following: (a) Within 300 flight hours or 3 months after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later, replace the fuel feed hose assemblies of the auxiliary power unit (APU) with new hose assemblies in accordance with Raytheon Aircraft Service Bulletin SB.49-3018, dated August 1997. (b) If replacement fuel feed hose assemblies are not immediately available for installation, shut down the APU and display warning notices prohibiting use of the APU in accordance with Raytheon Aircraft Service Bulletin SB.49-3018, dated August 1997, until the replacement required by paragraph (a) of this AD is accomplished. (c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA, Small Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Wichita ACO. NOTE 2: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Wichita ACO. (d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished. (e) The actions shall be done in accordance with Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.49-3018, dated August 1997. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Raytheon Aircraft Company, Manager Service Engineering, Hawker Customer Support Department, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC. (f) This amendment becomes effective on December 18, 1998. ## Rule preamble ### Supplementary information A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Raytheon Model Hawker 800XP series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on August 27, 1998 (63 FR 45773). That action proposed to require replacement of the fuel feed hose assemblies of the auxiliary power unit (APU) with new hose assemblies. Comments Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public. Conclusion The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed. Cost Impact The FAA estimates that 11 airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 5 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required replacement, and thatthe average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts will be provided by the manufacturer at no cost to the operators. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the replacement required by this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $3,300, or $300 per airplane. The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted. Regulatory Impact The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment. For thereasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES." List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety. Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows: PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 39.13 [Amended] 2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive: ## Affected data sheets (1) (OpenAirDocs) The type certificate data sheets whose models the AD names. - [TCDS A3EU](https://openairdocs.org/tcds/A3EU): Textron Aviation Inc.; names 1 of 50 models: Hawker 800XP ## Registered aircraft it may apply to (OpenAirDocs) Matched by airframe and engine model; the AD's applicability may narrow it by serial number, part number or equipment. - Aircraft: 275 (275 by airframe model, 0 by engine model) - Makers: Raytheon 251, Raytheon Corporate Jets 23, Hawker Beechcraft 1 Models with the most aircraft: - [Raytheon HAWKER 800XP](https://openairdocs.org/model/raytheon-hawker-800xp): 251 aircraft (airframe model) - [Raytheon Corporate Jets HAWKER 800XP](https://openairdocs.org/model/raytheon-corporate-jets-hawker-800xp): 23 aircraft (airframe model) - [Hawker Beechcraft HAWKER 800XP](https://openairdocs.org/model/hawker-beechcraft-hawker-800xp): 1 aircraft (airframe model) All 3 models: https://openairdocs.org/ad/98-23-15/models.md Every aircraft: https://openairdocs.org/ad/98-23-15/aircraft.md ## Related documents - [Proposed rule 98-NM-195-AD](https://openairdocs.org/proposed/98-NM-195-AD): Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), published Aug 27, 1998 Its text cites no advisory circulars or STCs. --- OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.