# Accident 20001018016119A: Beech B95, New Ulm, MN, October 18, 2000

- Type: FAA accident report (Accident/Incident Data System), as reported
- Date: October 18, 2000, 19:30 local time
- Place: New Ulm, MN
- Airport: New Ulm Municipal Airport
- Damage: No damage
- Operating rules: General operating rules (Part 91)
- Location: 44.3090° N, 94.4598° W: From the FAA, an estimate near the named town, within about 3 miles
- Nearby events: https://openairdocs.org/map.md?lat=44.3090&lon=-94.4598&mi=10
- Aircraft: N2016F, a cancelled registration (https://openairdocs.org/deregistered/N2016F-2001-07-23) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry model: Beech 95-C55 (registry code 1152708, https://openairdocs.org/model/beech-95-c55) (OpenAirDocs)
- Reported make and model: BEECH B95
- NTSB investigation: [NTSB CHI01LA018](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb/CHI01LA018) (OpenAirDocs)
- FAA source: FAA Aviation Safety Information Portal (https://asip.faa.gov/)
- Page: https://openairdocs.org/incident/20001018016119A

## Narrative

As the FAA filed it, in capitals; the FAA replaces private details with ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^.

(-23) PILOT STATED THAT HE HAD AN INDICATION OF AN ENGINE PROBLEM (SPUTTERING) DURING THE INITIAL PHASE OF FLIGHT PRIOR TO GEAR RETRACTION. PILOT ATTEMPTED TO MAKE AN EMERGENCY LANDING ON DEPARTURE RUNWAY BUT IMPACTED GROUND APPRO. THIRTY FEET TO THE RIGHT OF THE RUNWAY AND STRUCK A RUNWAY LIGHT BEFORE RETURNING TO AND STOPPING ON THE RUNWAY SURFACE.

## The NTSB's investigation of this event (1)

From the NTSB's public API. Aircraft are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported serial number, make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

- [NTSB CHI01LA018](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb/CHI01LA018), Oct 19, 2000: Beech 95-C55 (N2016F), New Ulm, MN, substantial damage. Probable cause: The engine failure for undetermined reasons, the pilot not attaining proper runway alignment, and the misjudged flare by the pilot. A factor was the runway light.

From the FAA Accident/Incident Data System. Reports are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model. For accidents, the NTSB's own investigation is the fuller record.

---
OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.