# Accident 20061006025639A: Cessna 172P, Glendale, AZ, October 6, 2006

- Type: FAA accident report (Accident/Incident Data System), as reported
- Date: October 6, 2006, 11:10 local time
- Place: Glendale, AZ
- Airport: Glendale Municipal Airport
- Damage: Substantial damage
- Phase of flight: Level Off Touchdown
- Operating rules: General operating rules (Part 91)
- Location: 33.5269° N, 112.2953° W: From the FAA
- Nearby events: https://openairdocs.org/map.md?lat=33.5269&lon=-112.2953&mi=10
- Aircraft: N97811, registered now (https://openairdocs.org/aircraft/N97811) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry model: Cessna 172P (registry code 2072436, https://openairdocs.org/model/cessna-172p) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry engine: Lycoming 0-320 series (registry code 41508, https://openairdocs.org/engine/lycoming-0-320-series) (OpenAirDocs)
- Reported make and model: CESSNA 172P
- People aboard: 2
- Fatal injuries: 0
- Pilot flight hours: 678 total, 320 in this make and model, 45 in the last 90 days
- NTSB investigation: [NTSB LAX07CA007](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb/LAX07CA007) (OpenAirDocs)
- FAA source: FAA Aviation Safety Information Portal (https://asip.faa.gov/)
- Page: https://openairdocs.org/incident/20061006025639A

## Narrative

As the FAA filed it, in capitals; the FAA replaces private details with ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^.

(-23) DURING AN INSPECTION OF THE ACCIDENT AIRCRAFT THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE NOTED: 1. THE RIGHT HAND WING STRUT DAMAGED DUE TO STRIKING OF RUNWAY SIGN DURING ROLL OUT. 2. THE NOSE LANDING GEAR TORQUE LINK REQUIRED REPLACEMENT. 3. THE NOSE GEAR STRUT REQUIRED RESEALING AND SERVICING. THE ORIGINAL REPORT FOR THIS ACCIDENT INDICATED THAT THE PILOT REPORTED THAT THE BOLT FOR THE NOSE TORQUE STRUT HAD FALLEN OUT DURING THE FLIGHT AND THAT WAS THE REASON THEY LOST DIRECTIONAL CONTROL. THIS IS CONSISTENT WITH THE EVIDENCE. HAD THE BOLT FALLEN OUT DURING FLIGHT, THE UPPER SNAP RING SECURING THE STRUT WOULD NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO HOLD BACK THE PRESSURE AND THE NOSE LOWER STRUT WOULD HAVE DEPARTED THE AIRCRAFT. ANOTHER ISSUE WAS THAT THE BUSHING FOR THE TORQUE LINK WAS DEFORMED CONSISTENT WITH A FRACTURE OF THE BOLT ON LANDING. THIS COULD BE CAUSED BY A NOSE GEAR LANDING FIRST WITH THE GEAR TURNED. WITNESS HAD STATED THAT THEY HAD SEEN THE AIRCRAFT PRACTICING CROSSWIND LANDINGS. BASED ON THE DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT THE MOST LIKELY CAUSE FOR THIS DAMAGE WOULD BE A HARD, NOSE FIRST, CROSS WIND LANDING.

## The NTSB's investigation of this event (1)

From the NTSB's public API. Aircraft are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported serial number, make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

- [NTSB LAX07CA007](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb/LAX07CA007), Oct 6, 2006: Cessna 172P (N97811), Glendale, AZ, substantial damage. Probable cause: the student's inadequate compensation for the gusting crosswind and inadequate flare that resulted in a hard landing. The certified flight instructor's inadequate supervision of the flight is also…

## Other reports on N97811 (2)

Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.

- [Accident 19870119000719A](https://openairdocs.org/incident/19870119000719A), Jan 19, 1987: Cessna 172P (N97811), Chena Hot Sprin, AK, Substantial damage. The aircraft ground looped on landing at a snow covered sod airstrip. The pilot misjudged the snow depth.
- [Incident 19850523028849I](https://openairdocs.org/incident/19850523028849I), May 23, 1985: Cessna 172P (N97811), Fairbanks, AK, Minor damage. Aircraft touched down short of runway due to windshear. Propeller damage. Wind shear advisories out for local area.

From the FAA Accident/Incident Data System. Reports are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model. For accidents, the NTSB's own investigation is the fuller record.

---
OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.
