# Accident 20090701054129A: Cessna R172K, Page, AZ, July 1, 2009

- Type: FAA accident report (Accident/Incident Data System), as reported
- Date: July 1, 2009, 09:30 local time
- Place: Page, AZ
- Airport: Page
- Damage: Substantial damage
- Phase of flight: Landing: Touchdown
- Operating rules: General operating rules (Part 91)
- Location: 36.9261° N, 111.4483° W: From the FAA
- Nearby events: https://openairdocs.org/map.md?lat=36.9261&lon=-111.4483&mi=10
- Aircraft: N1055V, registered now (https://openairdocs.org/aircraft/N1055V) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry model: Cessna R172K (registry code 2072431, https://openairdocs.org/model/cessna-r172k) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry engine: Continental IO-360 series (registry code 17025, https://openairdocs.org/engine/continental-io-360-series) (OpenAirDocs)
- Reported make and model: CESSNA R172K
- Fatal injuries: 0
- Other injuries: 0
- Pilot flight hours: 0 total, 0 in this make and model, 0 in the last 90 days
- NTSB investigation: [NTSB WPR09LA480](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb/WPR09LA480) (OpenAirDocs)
- FAA source: FAA Aviation Safety Information Portal (https://asip.faa.gov/)
- Page: https://openairdocs.org/incident/20090701054129A

## Narrative

As the FAA filed it, in capitals; the FAA replaces private details with ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^.

THERE ARE CONFLICTING REPORTS ON THE ACTUAL DATE OF THE HARD LANDING. THERE IS A DATE OF JULY 1, 2009 WHERE THE PILOT REPORTED TO THE AIRCRAFT RENTAL LOCATION THAT SHE EXPERIENCED A HARD LANDING. THEN THERE IS ANOTHER REPORT OF A HARD LANDING BY THE SAME PILOT IN THIS AIRCRAFT THAT WAS REPORTED TO INSURANCE. THE INSURANCE COMPANY IS INVESTIGATING BOTH DATES AS POTENTIAL FOR INSURANCE FRAUD. SINCE THE INSURANCE COMPANY IS INVESTIGATING, ALL PARTIES ARE LESS THEN COOPERATIVE IN GIVING ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.  ADDITIONAL FACTS: THE AIRPLANE REMAINED IN SERVICE AFTER THE FIRST REPORTED DATE AND MAY HAVE BEEN FLOWN BY OTHER OPERATORS PRIOR TO ANY REPORTED DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT.  AFTER THE FIRST DATE GIVEN FOR A HARD LANDING, THE AIRCRAFT WAS GIVEN A LIMITED INSPECTION BY AN A&P WHO REPORTED THE AIRCRAFT WAS AIRWORTHY.  THE SECOND HARD LANDING REPORT WAS INVESTIGATED BY ANOTHER FSDO AS A COMPLAINT. THE COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION CONFIRMED THAT A HARD LANDING DID NOT OCCUR IN BAKERSVILLE, CA.

## The NTSB's investigation of this event (1)

From the NTSB's public API. Aircraft are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported serial number, make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

- [NTSB WPR09LA480](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb/WPR09LA480), Jul 1, 2009: Cessna R172K (N1055V), Page, AZ, substantial damage. Probable cause: The pilot's improper landing flare and inadequate recovery from a bounced landing.

From the FAA Accident/Incident Data System. Reports are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model. For accidents, the NTSB's own investigation is the fuller record.

---
OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.
