# Incident 20090928050429I: Cessna R172E, Anapolis, MD, September 28, 2009

- Type: FAA incident report (Accident/Incident Data System), as reported
- Date: September 28, 2009, 13:00 local time
- Place: Anapolis, MD
- Airport: Lee Airport
- Damage: Minor damage
- Operating rules: General operating rules (Part 91)
- Location: 38.9429° N, 76.5684° W: Placed by OpenAirDocs at LEE (ANP), within about a mile (OpenAirDocs)
- Nearby events: https://openairdocs.org/map.md?lat=38.9429&lon=-76.5684&mi=10
- Aircraft: N7876N, a cancelled registration (https://openairdocs.org/deregistered/N7876N-2020-02-03) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry model: Cessna R172E (registry code 2072413, https://openairdocs.org/model/cessna-r172e) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry engine: Continental IO-360 series (registry code 17025, https://openairdocs.org/engine/continental-io-360-series) (OpenAirDocs)
- Reported make and model: CESSNA R172E
- Reported engine: CONT MOTOR IO-360-D
- People aboard: 1
- Fatal injuries: 0
- Other injuries: 0
- Pilot certificates: Student
- Pilot flight hours: 94 total, 94 in this make and model, 28 in the last 90 days
- FAA source: FAA Aviation Safety Information Portal (https://asip.faa.gov/)
- Page: https://openairdocs.org/incident/20090928050429I

## Narrative

As the FAA filed it, in capitals; the FAA replaces private details with ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^.

STUDENT PILOT WAS RETURNING FROM HIS SCHEDULED PRIVATE PILOT CHECK RIDE AT ESN MARYLAND.  THE FLIGHT PORTION OF HIS TEST WAS CANCELLED DUE TO RAIN AND 15 KNOT WINDS.  DURING HIS RETURN TO BASE THE PILOT HEARD INTERMITTENT STALL WARNING INDICATIONS.  ALL OTHER INDICATIONS WERE NORMAL HOWEVER THE PILOT ELECTED TO EXECUTE A PRECAUTIONARY LANDING AT ANP MARYLAND.  PILOT CARRIED EXTRA SPEED DUE TO THE INTERMITTENT STALL WARNING AND ELECTED TO LAND LONG RATHER THAN EXECUTE A GO-AROUND.  THE AIRCRAFT SLID OFF THE END OF THE WET RUNWAY RESULTING IN MINOR DAMAGE TO AIRCRAFT PROPELLER AND WING STRUT. THE MECHANIC WAS CONTACTED REGARDING THE STALL WARNING AND HE SAID THAT THE STALL WARNING SYSTEM WAS INSPECTED AND TESTED AND COULD NOT FIND ANY ISSUES WITH THE SYSTEM. THE MECHANIC ALSO WAS THE ONE THAT FLEW THE AIRCRAFT BACK TO FME AND STATED THAT THERE WAS NO ISSUE WITH THE STALL WARNING SYSTEM WHEN HE FLEW THE AIRCRAFT BACK TO ITS HOME BASE.

From the FAA Accident/Incident Data System. Reports are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model. For accidents, the NTSB's own investigation is the fuller record.

---
OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.