# Incident 20140302003369I: Cessna 182Q, Lusby, MD, March 2, 2014

- Type: FAA incident report (Accident/Incident Data System), as reported
- Date: March 2, 2014, 12:57 local time
- Place: Lusby, MD
- Airport: Chesapeake Ranch Airport
- Damage: Substantial damage
- Phase of flight: Landing: Touchdown
- Operating rules: General operating rules (Part 91)
- Location: 38.3612° N, 76.4052° W: Placed by OpenAirDocs at CHESAPEAKE RANCH (MD50), within about a mile (OpenAirDocs)
- Nearby events: https://openairdocs.org/map.md?lat=38.3612&lon=-76.4052&mi=10
- Aircraft: N4822N, registered now (https://openairdocs.org/aircraft/N4822N) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry model: Cessna 182Q (registry code 2072732, https://openairdocs.org/model/cessna-182q) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry engine: Continental O-470 series (registry code 17026, https://openairdocs.org/engine/continental-o-470-series) (OpenAirDocs)
- Reported make and model: CESSNA 182Q
- Reported engine: CONT MOTOR O-470 SERIES
- People aboard: 2
- Fatal injuries: 0
- Other injuries: 0
- Pilot certificates: Private pilot
- Pilot flight hours: 325 total
- FAA source: FAA Aviation Safety Information Portal (https://asip.faa.gov/)
- Page: https://openairdocs.org/incident/20140302003369I

## Narrative

As the FAA filed it, in capitals; the FAA replaces private details with ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^.

PILOT STATED HE ATTEMPTED TO THE LAND THE AIRCRAFT WHILE BOTH THE ALTITUDE AND AIRSPEED FOR THE APPROACH WERE HIGHER THAN ANTICIPATED.

HE INITIALLY TOUCHED DOWN JUST PRIOR TO MID-FIELD BUT THE AIRCRAFT BOUNCED AND BECAME AIRBORNE AGAIN. ON THE SECOND LANDING HE BOUNCED THE AIRCRAFT AGAIN. THE THIRD LANDING HE WAS ABLE TO KEEP THE AIRCRAFT ON THE RUNWAY BUT HE REALIZED HE DID NOT HAVE ENOUGH RUNWAY LENGTH AVAILABLE TO STOP THE AIRCRAFT. THE PILOT FELT THAT HAD HE ELECTED TO CONTINUE STRAIGHT ON THE RUNWAY HE WOULD HAVE GONE OVER A STEEP DROP-OFF, ROUGHLY 30 FEET DOWN, OVER A ROAD AND IN TO A SEWER RUN-OFF AREA WHICH WAS FULL AT THE TIME. THE PILOT ELECTED TO STEER THE AIRCRAFT OFF OF THE RIGHT SIDE OF THE RUNWAY, DOWN A SLIGHT HILL, THROUGH WOODEN BARRIERS, ACROSS A PAVED ROAD, AND IN TO A RAVINE. ALTHOUGH SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE WAS ENCOUNTERED AND POSSIBLY ECONOMICALLY NOT SALVAGEABLE, STRUCTURAL DAMAGE WAS NOT READILY APPARENT AND NO INJURIES WERE ENCOUNTERED.

RECOMMEND REMEDIAL TRAINING WITH AN INSTRUCTOR AND 709 RIDE WITH AN ASI WITH EMPHASIS ON:

-AERONAUTICAL DECISION MAKING

-TRAFFIC PATTERNS

-APPROACHES AND LANDINGS

-GO AROUNDS

^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ IS CITING JOB DEMANDS AND PENDING TRAVEL WHICH IS PRECLUDING HIM FROM PROVIDING REQUESTED INFORMATION CONCERNING:

FLYING TIME IN TYPE AIRCRAFT

FLYING TIME LAST 90 DAYS

HOURS IN MAKE AND MODEL

EXACT DATE OF BIENNIAL REVIEW

CFI'S NAME

^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ HAS TAKEN A DEFENSIVE POSITION REGARDING REQUESTED INFORMATION AND IS QUESTIONING THE REASONING FOR OUR REQUEST.

IF ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ PROVIDES THE REQUESTED INFORMATION THIS DOCUMENT WILL BE AMENDED.

THE INCIDENT INVESTIGATION IS CONCLUDED AT THIS TIME.

From the FAA Accident/Incident Data System. Reports are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model. For accidents, the NTSB's own investigation is the fuller record.

---
OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.