# Accident 20250808010589A: Cessna 172N, Ronan, MT, August 8, 2025

- Type: FAA accident report (Accident/Incident Data System), as reported
- Date: August 8, 2025, 09:00 local time
- Place: Ronan, MT
- Airport: Ronan
- Damage: Substantial damage
- Phase of flight: Landing: Touchdown
- Operating rules: General operating rules (Part 91)
- Location: 47.5663° N, 114.1007° W: From the FAA
- Nearby events: https://openairdocs.org/map.md?lat=47.5663&lon=-114.1007&mi=10
- Aircraft: N734SW, registered now (https://openairdocs.org/aircraft/N734SW) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry model: Cessna 172N (registry code 2072434, https://openairdocs.org/model/cessna-172n) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry engine: Lycoming 0-320 series (registry code 41508, https://openairdocs.org/engine/lycoming-0-320-series) (OpenAirDocs)
- Reported make and model: CESSNA 172N
- Reported engine: LYCOMING 0-320 SERIES
- People aboard: 1
- Fatal injuries: 0
- Other injuries: 0
- Pilot certificates: Student
- Pilot flight hours: 37 total, 37 in this make and model, 37 in the last 90 days
- NTSB investigation: [NTSB WPR25LA243](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb/WPR25LA243) (OpenAirDocs)
- FAA source: FAA Aviation Safety Information Portal (https://asip.faa.gov/)
- Page: https://openairdocs.org/incident/20250808010589A

## Narrative

As the FAA filed it, in capitals; the FAA replaces private details with ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^.

SAS TASK T-NM05-FY25-0529

SAS AR NM05202502208 AND NM05202502257

DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVIATION:

WHILE OPERATING ON A SOLO CROSS-COUNTRY FLIGHT ON AUGUST 8, 2025 AT 9 AM LOCAL TIME, ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^, A STUDENT PILOT BOUNCED AND PORPOISED THE CESSNA 172N MULTIPLE TIMES WHILE ATTEMPTING TO LAND ON RUNWAY 16 AT 7S0 IN RONAN, MONTANA, CAUSING SUBSTANTIAL DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT BEFORE COMING TO A REST ON THE RUNWAY.

CAUSAL AND/OR CONTRIBUTING FACTORS:

THE PILOT WAS A SOLO STUDENT ON A SOLO CROSS-COUNTRY FLIGHT. THE STUDENT PILOT HAD PREVIOUSLY PRACTICED LANDING AT THIS AIRPORT; HOWEVER, IT WAS AT NIGHT. HE STATED THAT HE HAD SOME EXPERIENCE IN ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^, BUT IT WAS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT FROM THE OTHER C172 THAT HE HAD BEEN TRAINING IN. HE SAID THAT HE HAD BOUNCED THE AIRCRAFT BEFORE ON A PREVIOUS FLIGHT, AND IT HAD ENDED UP OK WITH NO DAMAGE. HE THOUGHT THE OSCILLATIONS WOULD STOP AND DID NOT CONSIDER EXECUTING A GO-AROUND. HE STATED THAT HE THOUGHT HE WAS EITHER PUSHING FORWARD OR AFT ON THE YOKE BUT COULD NOT REMEMBER. DUE TO THE STUDENT PILOT’S LACK OF EXPERIENCE AND SKILL, HE DID NOT RECOGNIZE THAT THE ATTITUDE OF THE NOSE WAS TOO LOW ON HIS LANDING, RECOGNIZE WHEN HE SHOULD HAVE EXECUTED A GO-AROUND, OR USE THE CORRECT CONTROL INPUTS ONCE THE OSCILLATIONS STARTED.

NO ATC ACTIONS CONTRIBUTORY TO THE EVENT.

NO RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SYSTEMIC CORRECTIVE ACTION.

ACTION TAKEN TO CORRECT PROBLEM AND PREVENT REOCCURRENCE:

COMPLIANCE ACTION – COUNSELING. THE STUDENT PILOT WAS COUNSELED ON THE NECESSITY FOR INITIATING A GO-AROUND AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND TRAINING FOR CORRECT ACTIONS IN DIFFERENT SCENARIOS. THE IMPORTANCE OF PRACTICING GO-AROUNDS IN DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS AT DIFFERENT TIMES DURING THE APPROACH TO LANDING PHASE OF FLIGHT WAS EMPHASIZED. THE IMPORTANCE OF AIRCRAFT FAMILIARITY AND COMMUNICATION WITH HIS FLIGHT INSTRUCTOR WAS ALSO STRESSED.

## The NTSB's investigation of this event (1)

From the NTSB's public API. Aircraft are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported serial number, make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

- [NTSB WPR25LA243](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb/WPR25LA243), Aug 8, 2025: Cessna 172N (N734SW), Ronan, MT, substantial damage. Probable cause: The student pilot's inadequate landing flare and recovery from a bounced landing.

From the FAA Accident/Incident Data System. Reports are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model. For accidents, the NTSB's own investigation is the fuller record.

---
OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.