# NTSB ATL04TA012: Cessna 210L, N59063, Tallahassee, FL, October 7, 2003

- Type: NTSB accident investigation
- Classification: Accident · No injuries · Final report
- Date: October 7, 2003, 11:20 local (15:20 UTC)
- Place: Tallahassee, FL
- Coordinates: 30.549999, -84.378608
- Nearby events: https://openairdocs.org/map.md?lat=30.5500&lon=-84.3786&mi=10
- Phase of flight: [Enroute](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-phases/400) (OpenAirDocs' grouping)
- Highest injury: No injuries
- Injuries: 2 uninjured
- Status: Completed, report June 28, 2006
- Report: Approved by Office Director
- Parties: Tampa FSDO
- NTSB case key (mKey): 58101
- NTSB case page: https://web.ntsb.gov/investigations/?ntsbnumber=ATL04TA012
- NTSB report (PDF, downloads): https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/58101/pdf
- Page: https://openairdocs.org/ntsb/ATL04TA012

## Probable cause

Loss of engine power due to crankshaft counterweight failure.

## Sequence of events

In NTSB's coding before 2008 (https://www.ntsb.gov/GILS/Documents/codman.pdf).

- Loss of engine power(total) - mech failure/malf, cruise
  - eng assembly,crankshaft counterweights/vib damper - failure (cause)
- Forced landing, descent - emergency
- In flight collision with terrain/water, emergency descent/landing
  - terrain condition - open field

## Analysis

According to the pilot, while in cruise flight at 10,000 feet agl, the engine lost power. The pilot made a wheels up  forced landing into a field. Maintenance history revealed that the engine had a propeller strike on February 19, 2003. The engine was removed from the airplane and sent to Certified Engines Unlimited, for special  inspection. The engine had a total time since major overhaul (TTSMOH) of 509.2 hours. On March 21, 2003, the engine was reinstalled on the airplane and returned to service. On May 13, 2003, the engine was removed and sent to Certified Engines Unlimited, due to a crankshaft counterweight failure TTSMOH 535.1 hours. The counterweights were replaced and the engine was reinstalled on the airplane June 12, 2003. On October 7, 2003 while in cruise flight the airplane had a catastrophic engine failure TTSMOH 734.1 hours. Examination of the engine at TCM found the crankshaft  fractured through the number one connecting rod journal forward fillet radius and upper counterweight hanger blade. The rear upper crankshaft counterweight was detached from its hanger blade. One plate and snap-ring was forced from their locations on each side of the counterweight by mechanical action of the pins. The counterweight plates of this counterweight were bowed outward in relationship to their installed positions. One of the snap-rings was fractured in two pieces and both snap-rings that were not in place exhibited signatures of being forced from their retaining grooves in the counterweight. The remaining rear counterweight exhibited sever mechanical damage and was intact on the hanger blade. The forward set of counterweights, pins, plates and snap-rings were intact and undamaged and had free and unrestricted movement on the hanger blades.

## Factual narrative

On October 7, 2003, at 1120 eastern daylight time, a Cessna 210L, N59063, registered to and operated by the United States Customs Service, made a forced landing into a field following a loss of engine power near Tallahassee, Florida. The flight was operated as a Public Use airplane under the provisions of Title 14 CFR Part 91, and instrument flight rules. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and an IFR flight plan was filed. The pilot and pilot rated passenger were not injured and the airplane sustained substantial damage. The flight originated from Jacksonville, Florida, on October 7, 2003, at 0800.

According to the pilot, while in cruise flight at 10,000 feet agl, the engine lost power. The pilot made a wheels up  forced landing into a field. Examination of the undercarriage of the airplane found structural damage to the skin, stringers and frame components. Examination of the engine found a large hole in the outer case. The engine was crated and sent to Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) for further examination.

Maintenance history indicated that the engine had a propeller strike on February 19, 2003. The engine was removed from the airplane and sent to Certified Engines Unlimited,  in Opa-Locka, Florida for inspection. The engine had a total time since major overhaul (TTSMOH) of 509.2 hours. On March 21, 2003, the engine was reinstalled on the airplane and returned to service. On May 13, 2003, the engine was removed and sent to Certified Engines Unlimited, due to a crankshaft counterweight failure TTSMOH 535.1 hours. The counterweights were replaced and the engine was reinstalled on the airplane June 12, 2003. On October 7, 2003 while in cruise flight the airplane had a catastrophic engine failure TTSMOH 734.1 hours.

On April 26, 2004, the engine was examined at TCM. Present during the examination were representatives from TCM, NTSB, and the US Costume Service, Department of Home Land Security. The engine was completely disassembled and examined. Examination found the crankshaft  fractured through the number one connecting rod journal forward fillet radius and upper counterweight hanger blade. The number three connecting rod journal was fractured at the rear fillet radius. The number four connecting rod journal was fractured at the forward fillet radius. The crankshaft was distorted along its length. The number one and two main bearing journals had scoring. The remaining connecting rod journals, main journals and thrust surfaces were undamaged and showed no signs of abnormal wear or lubrication distress. The rear upper crankshaft counterweight was detached from its hanger blade. One plate and snap-ring was forced from their locations on each side of the counterweight by mechanical action of the pins. The counterweight plates of this counterweight were bowed outward in relationship to there installed positions. One of the snap-rings was fractured in two pieces and both snap-rings that were not in place exhibited signatures of being forced from their retaining grooves in the counterweight. The remaining rear counterweight exhibited sever mechanical damage and was intact on the hanger blade. The forward set of counterweights, pins, plates and snap-rings were intact and undamaged and had free and unrestricted movement on the hanger blades. The crankshaft gear teeth were severely damaged as a result of the through fracture.

## Aircraft

- Registration: [N59063](https://openairdocs.org/deregistered/N59063-2010-07-28), registration cancelled 2010-07-28, S/N 21060062, built 1973 (OpenAirDocs)
- Reported make and model: Cessna 210L
- Registry model: [Cessna 210L](https://openairdocs.org/model/cessna-210l) (registry code 2073448) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry engine: [Continental IO-520 series](https://openairdocs.org/engine/continental-io-520-series) (registry code 17032, reciprocating) (OpenAirDocs)
- Category: Airplane
- Serial number: 210-60062
- Airframe hours: 3985
- Engines: Continental IO-550 300 horsepower reciprocating
- Damage: Substantial damage
- Flight: Public aircraft, Part 91
- Registered owner: US Customs Service
- Airworthiness certificate: Standard, Normal
- Last inspection: Continuous airworthiness, September 29, 2003, 5.9 hours before
- Departed: NIP, Jacksonville, FL
- Destination: BHM, Birmingham, AL
- Flight plan: IFR
- Airport: THL, Tallahassee Regional

## Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

- Pilot; injuries: none; flight instructor, airline transport, commercial; airplane ratings: single-engine land, multi-engine land; instrument ratings: airplane, helicopter; medical: class 1, valid medical--no waivers/lim.; last flight review April 22, 2003; seat: left; flight hours: 4,751 total, 533 in this make and model, 2,303 as pilot in command, 59 in the last 90 days, 1 in the last 24 hours

## Weather

- Conditions: Visual (VMC), Day
- Wind: 80° at 5 knots
- Visibility: 6 statute miles
- Lowest ceiling: 1,800 ft broken
- Temperature: 72 °F, dew point 66 °F
- Altimeter: 30.03 inHg
- Observed at: TLH, 10 nm away

From the NTSB's public API. Aircraft are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported serial number, make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

---
OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.
