# NTSB CEN17LA065: Lueck Kitfox 7, N320RJ, Cody, WY, December 23, 2016

- Type: NTSB accident investigation
- Classification: Accident · No injuries · Limited investigation · Final report
- Date: December 23, 2016, 10:13 local (17:13 UTC)
- Place: Cody, WY
- Coordinates: 44.527221, -109.010833 (estimated)
- Nearby events: https://openairdocs.org/map.md?lat=44.5272&lon=-109.0108&mi=10
- Phase of flight: [Landing](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-phases/550) (OpenAirDocs' grouping)
- Defining event: [Landing-landing roll: Collision during takeoff/land](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/490)
- Highest injury: No injuries
- Injuries: 1 uninjured
- Status: Completed, report September 6, 2017
- Report: Approved by Office Director
- NTSB office: Central Region
- Parties: Federal Aviation Administration; DEN FSDO
- NTSB case key (mKey): 94552
- NTSB case page: https://web.ntsb.gov/investigations/?ntsbnumber=CEN17LA065
- NTSB report (PDF, downloads): https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/94552/pdf
- NTSB docket: https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=94552
- Page: https://openairdocs.org/ntsb/CEN17LA065

## Probable cause

Improper maintenance of the fuel pressure regulator, which resulted in an excessive fuel and airbox pressure differential and subsequent loss of engine power.

## Findings

NTSB's coded findings; those marked are part of the probable cause.

- [Maintenance: scheduled/routine maintenance](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02062010): Personnel issues › Task performance · Maintenance personnel (probable cause); cases with it: [Lueck Rod KITFOX 7, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02062010/cases.md?model=05627GO), [All aircraft, 320 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02062010/cases.md)
- [Fuel system: fuel pressure](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01022844): Aircraft › Aircraft systems · Incorrect service/maintenance (probable cause); cases with it: [Lueck Rod KITFOX 7, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01022844/cases.md?model=05627GO), [All aircraft, 16 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01022844/cases.md)
- [Fuel system: fuel pressure](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01022844): Aircraft › Aircraft systems · Capability exceeded (probable cause); cases with it: [Lueck Rod KITFOX 7, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01022844/cases.md?model=05627GO), [All aircraft, 16 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01022844/cases.md)
- [Indicating/recording systems](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01023100): Aircraft › Aircraft systems · Failure; cases with it: [Lueck Rod KITFOX 7, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01023100/cases.md?model=05627GO), [All aircraft, 18 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01023100/cases.md)

## Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event best describes what happened.

- [Approach-VFR pattern base: Loss of engine power (partial)](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/342); cases with it: [Lueck Rod KITFOX 7, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/342/sequence.md?model=05627GO), [All aircraft, 1,858 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/342/sequence.md)
- [Approach-VFR pattern base: Attempted remediation/recovery](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/060); cases with it: [Lueck Rod KITFOX 7, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/060/sequence.md?model=05627GO), [All aircraft, 1,422 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/060/sequence.md)
- [Emergency descent: Loss of engine power (partial)](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/342); cases with it: [Lueck Rod KITFOX 7, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/342/sequence.md?model=05627GO), [All aircraft, 1,858 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/342/sequence.md)
- [Landing: Off-field or emergency landing](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/440); cases with it: [Lueck Rod KITFOX 7, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/440/sequence.md?model=05627GO), [All aircraft, 3,365 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/440/sequence.md)
- [Landing-landing roll: Collision during takeoff/land](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/490) (defining event); cases with it: [Lueck Rod KITFOX 7, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/490/sequence.md?model=05627GO), [All aircraft, 1,309 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/490/sequence.md)
- [Landing-landing roll: Nose over/nose down](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/096); cases with it: [Lueck Rod KITFOX 7, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/096/sequence.md?model=05627GO), [All aircraft, 2,287 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/096/sequence.md)

## Analysis

The commercial pilot stated that he had experienced engine roughness during previous flights in the accident airplane. Maintenance personnel determined that the airplane was not receiving adequate fuel at full power, even with both electric fuel pumps operating. As a result, they installed check valves in the fuel system and replaced the fuel pressure regulator. On the day of the accident, the engine experienced a total loss of power after both fuel pumps were turned off during a pre-takeoff engine run-up. The pilot and mechanic then performed another run-up check, during which the engine operated normally. The pilot subsequently departed and entered the airport traffic pattern. While on the downwind leg, with both fuel pumps operating, the pilot reduced engine power and the engine experienced a total loss of power. The pilot performed a forced landing to a field, during which the nose landing gear collapsed. Postaccident examination of the engine revealed that the fuel pressure and airbox pressure differential was not within the engine manufacturer's limits. The fuel pressure regulator was adjusted within those limits, and the engine was subsequently test run with no anomalies.

## Factual narrative

On December 23, 2016, at 1013 mountain standard time, a Kitfox 7, N320RJ, experienced a loss of engine power during a visual approach from the airport traffic pattern at Yellowstone Regional Airport (COD), Cody, Wyoming. The pilot performed a forced landing to a field where the airplane nosed-over and impacted terrain. The commercial pilot was uninjured. The airplane received substantial damage. The airplane was registered to and operated by an individual under 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 as a pilot proficiency flight. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed for the flight that was not operating on a flight plan. The flight originated from COD about 1000 and was to remain in the airport traffic pattern. The pilot was employed as a flight instructor for Choice Aviation at COD. The pilot stated that the airplane was owned by a former student of his, who was issued a private pilot certificate in November 2016. The pilot stated that he had provided all the airplane owner's flight training toward his private pilot certificate, using a Cessna 172M operated by Choice Aviation. The airplane owner planned on flying the accident airplane and had Choice Aviation perform a condition inspection on October 20, 2016. The airplane owner wanted the pilot to fly the airplane to gain proficiency so that the owner could receive flight instruction from the pilot using the accident airplane. On November 5, 2016, the pilot and the chief pilot of Choice Aviation performed a checkout flight in the accident airplane, but the flight returned and landed without incident shortly after takeoff due to engine roughness. The airplane then underwent maintenance at Choice Aviation where it was determined that the it was not receiving enough fuel at full power, even with both electric fuel pumps on. Check valves were installed in the fuel system, and the fuel pressure regulator was replaced. On December 22, 2016, the pilot and chief pilot performed a second checkout flight in the accident airplane, during which there was "slight engine roughness" at high power settings, which was not "as bad" as what had occurred on the previous checkout flight. The airplane "ran perfectly fine" at 35 inches of manifold pressure and below. The pilot and chief pilot performed power off stalls, steep turns, climbs and descent as well as three takeoffs and landings, and the airplane "flew normal." The pilot stated that to fix the remaining fuel issue at high power settings, a Choice Aviation mechanic adjusted the fuel pressure to the maximum setting for the engine to receive more fuel needed to run at maximum engine power. On the day of the accident, the pilot flew another flight in the accident airplane to gain further proficiency in the handling characteristics of the airplane. The pilot stated that prior to the flight, he performed a "thorough" preflight inspection of the airplane, and the inspected items were in "working order." The pilot performed "several" start attempts and hadto use the choke to start the engine in cold weather conditions. While holding short of runway 22 for takeoff, the pilot ran the engine to 4,000 rpm and checked the ignition circuits. He then turned fuel pump "B" on and ran the engine to maximum power, which brought the fuel pressure to 23 psi; the engine ran "fine." The pilot said that on previous flights, the engine would not run "smoothly" at maximum power settings. The pilot said that when he reduced engine power to 4,000 rpm and turned off both pumps, the engine "slowly quit." He then restarted the engine and taxied to maintenance to confirm normal operation of the engine with the mechanic. The airplane engine was then run-up with the pilot and the mechanic, and the engine remained in limits from maximum power to idle with both fuel pumps on. With both fuel pumps off, the fuel pressure dropped, and the engine did not quit. The mechanic exited the airplane, and the pilot taxied the airplane to runway 22 and performed another run-up at 4,000 rpm with both fuel pumps on and "everything checked out." The pilot then performed a takeoff from runway 22 and entered a left crosswind, during which the pitot tube rotated sideways resulting in an airspeed indication of 0 knots. The pilot then flew a left traffic pattern to land on runway 22. While in a left downwind and abeam the runway numbers, the pilot reduced engine power to 15 inches of manifold pressure, with both fuel pumps on, to begin a descent. He "sensed" something was not right with the engine so he applied power and there was no response. He turned the airplane onto a left base and maintained what he thought was the pitch attitude for best glide. The propeller continued to turn, but after multiple attempts to adjust the throttle, he realized that the engine was not responding. The pilot performed a forced landing in a grass field short of runway 22 due to a snow bank near the approach end of the runway. During the landing, the airplane rolled for about 75 feet until the nose landing gear collapsed. The airplane then slid for about 90 feet. Examination of the airplane revealed that a black color fuel line to the pressure regulator was ¼ inch in diameter. The absolute pressure sensor was not mounted using a screw through its mounting hole. The absolute pressure sensor, "966 507," was attached to the engine frame using a black-color substance consistent with sealant in front of and toward the bottom of airplane battery, which was mounted on the right side of the firewall, as viewed from tail-to-nose. The airplane contained useable fuel in the left and right fuel tanks consistent in color with 100 low lead aviation fuel. The left and right wing filler cap vents were unobstructed. The pitot tube was rotated laterally so that the pitot tube inlet was pointed inward toward the fuselage. The airplane engine did not exhibit any leaks of fuel, oil, or coolant. Engine control continuity from the cockpit control to the engine was confirmed. Thepressure regulator, "887 130, 16.0280," exhibited a gouge on the side of the its adjustment screw retaining nut. The fuel selector was in the off position. All the fuel line shut off valves were in the on position. The Hobbs meter indication was 109.7 hours. In preparation of an engine run, the oil quantity level was checked by rotating the propeller by hand until a burp was heard from the engine oil reservoir. The engine oil level then rose, and its quantity was at the base of the oil filler neck, which was above the maximum oil capacity for the engine. The excess engine oil was drained and estimated to be about 16 ounces above the maximum oil capacity for the engine. The propeller was removed due to accident damage and replaced for the engine run. The airplane was then tied down and was started after six start attempts over about a 1:00 minute period. The engine was then run for about 5:30 minutes to a full-power setting without power loss. To replicate the accident flight, a second engine run was then performed during which the engine was run at a full power setting and then retarded to 15 inches of manifold pressure. When engine power was retarded to a manifold pressure of 15 inches, with both fuel pumps in the on-position, the engine quit and was unable to be restarted. Fuel lines were examined after the engine run. The black color fuel line, leading to the fuel pressure regulator, contained fuel and exhibited pressure when the fuel pumps were on; the return fuel line contained fuel. The engine was unable to be started after several attempts. The airplane interior was removed to examine the fuel system/lines for leakage/obstruction and none were noted. A transparent-green color fuel return line from the pressure regulator was connected toward the bottom left side of the fuel header tank behind the passenger seat. There was a second transparent-green color line connected to the top of fuel header tank that had a transducer spliced into the line which was connected to the right fuel tank via the wing root. The transducer, of undetermined function, was at a distance midpoint between the top of the header tank and the right-wing root. Fuel was present up to the transducer but there was no fuel present in the line above the transducer throughout the examination/engine runs. Black color fuel lines from the left and right-wing fuel tanks were connected toward the bottom of the fuel header tank. The fuel pressure regulator fuel return line was disconnected from the pressure regulator's return port, and a fuel hose was connected from pressure regulator's return port and inserted into the right-wing filler port. A dual needle pressure gauge was attached to the pressure regulator and induction manifold as per the engine maintenance manual. After several engine start attempts, the engine was started and the fuel pressure needle was about 62.5 inches and the manifold pressure was about 29 inches. When engine power was reduced to about 17 inches ofmanifold pressure with the fuel pumps on, the engine quit. The pressure regulator screw was turned one turn toward decreasing fuel pressure. The engine was started with less start attempts of shorter duration and was run again. The fuel pressure and manifold pressure had a differential of about 5 inches. The engine was run at full power and then at 15 inches with and without the fuel pump on and there was no loss of engine power. The throttle was cycled between full power and 15 inches with the fuel pumps on and there was no loss of engine power. According to Rotex 914 Fuel Pressure Regulator maintenance information, the "maximum fuel pressure is approximately 10.3 inches of mercury (5.08 psi) above airbox pressure. The minimum fuel pressure is approximately 4.44 inches of mercury (2.18 psi) above the airbox pressure. The fuel pressure regulators are "PRE-SET at the factory and RARELY need adjustment if at all…EVER!"

## Aircraft

- Registration: [N320RJ](https://openairdocs.org/aircraft/N320RJ), registered now, S/N S70507084, built 2008 (OpenAirDocs)
- Reported make and model: LUECK KITFOX 7
- Registry model: [Lueck Rod KITFOX 7](https://openairdocs.org/model/lueck-rod-kitfox-7) (registry code 05627GO) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry engine: [Rotax 914UL](https://openairdocs.org/engine/rotax-914ul) (registry code 55553, 4 cycle) (OpenAirDocs)
- Category: Airplane, amateur-built
- Serial number: S70507084
- Airframe hours: 39
- Engines: Rotax 914UL 115 horsepower reciprocating
- Damage: Substantial damage
- Flight: Personal, Part 91
- Airworthiness certificate: Special, Experimental (Special)
- Last inspection: Condition, October 20, 2016
- Departed: COD, Cody, WY
- Destination: COD, Cody, WY
- Airport: COD, Yellowstone Regional Airport, runway 22, 8,268 × 100 ft, asphalt

## Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

- Pilot; age 23; injuries: none; flight instructor, commercial; airplane ratings: single-engine land, multi-engine land; instrument ratings: airplane; medical: class 1, with waivers/limitations; last flight review August 5, 2016; seat: left; restraint: 3-point; flight hours: 467 total, 1 in this make and model, 403 as pilot in command, 107 in the last 90 days, 24 in the last 30 days, 2 in the last 24 hours

## Weather

- Conditions: Visual (VMC), Day
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Lowest ceiling: none
- Temperature: 16 °F, dew point 3 °F
- Altimeter: 29.81 inHg
- Observed at: COD, 2 nm away

## FAA reports on this event (1)

The FAA's own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date (OpenAirDocs).

- [Accident 20161223021279A](https://openairdocs.org/incident/20161223021279A), Dec 23, 2016: Lueck Rod KITFOX 7, Cody, WY, Substantial damage. On 12/23/2016, at approximately 1213 MDT, aircraft N320RJ, an experimental amateur-built Kitfox 7, made an emergency landing short of runway 22 at Yellowstone…

## Docket (3 files)

The files NTSB released with the investigation on July 24, 2017, on NTSB's docket system: https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=94552. 3.4 MB in all.

- Pilot/Operator Aircraft Accident Report, NTSB Form 6120.1 (item 1, .PDF, 1.3 MB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=40454350&FileExtension=.PDF&FileName=Pilot%2FOperator%20Aircraft%20Accident%20Report,%20NTSB%20Form%206120.1-Master.PDF
- Record of Examination (item 2, .PDF, 62 KB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=40454351&FileExtension=.PDF&FileName=Record%20of%20Examination-Master.PDF
- Rotex Maintenance Excerpt (item 3, .PDF, 2.0 MB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=40454352&FileExtension=.PDF&FileName=Rotex%20Maintenance%20Excerpt-Master.PDF

From the NTSB's public API. Aircraft are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported serial number, make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

---
OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.