# NTSB CHI05CA075: Cessna 172K, N7325G, Portage, WI, February 26, 2005

- Type: NTSB accident investigation
- Classification: Accident · Serious injuries · Data collection · Final report
- Date: February 26, 2005, 16:20 local (22:20 UTC)
- Place: Portage, WI
- Coordinates: 43.560276, -89.48278
- Nearby events: https://openairdocs.org/map.md?lat=43.5603&lon=-89.4828&mi=10
- Phase of flight: [Landing](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-phases/550) (OpenAirDocs' grouping)
- Highest injury: Serious injuries
- Injuries: 1 serious, 1 minor
- Status: Completed, report June 8, 2005
- Report: Approved by Office Director
- Parties: Federal Aviation Administration - Milwaukee FSDO
- NTSB case key (mKey): 61191
- NTSB case page: https://web.ntsb.gov/investigations/?ntsbnumber=CHI05CA075
- NTSB report (PDF, downloads): https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/61191/pdf
- Page: https://openairdocs.org/ntsb/CHI05CA075

## Probable cause

The pilot's failure to maintain adequate airspeed during the aborted landing, which resulted in an inadvertent stall at a low altitude.  Factors to the accident were the pilot's lack of experience flying from the right pilot station and his failure to maintain directional control during landing rollout.

## Sequence of events

In NTSB's coding before 2008 (https://www.ntsb.gov/GILS/Documents/codman.pdf).

- Loss of control - on ground/water, landing - roll
  - lack of experience, pilot in command (contributing factor)
  - directional control - not maintained, pilot in command (contributing factor)
- Loss of control - in flight, landing - aborted
  - airspeed - not maintained, pilot in command (cause)
  - stall - inadvertent, pilot in command (cause)
  - altitude - low (cause)
- In flight collision with terrain/water, descent - uncontrolled

## Analysis

The airplane stalled and impacted the runway during an aborted landing.  The pilot reported that the accident flight was with a prospective new flying club member.  The pilot stated that the club required new members complete a check-out flight with a current member.  The prospective new member (passenger) held a student pilot certificate and had flown solo prior to the accident flight.  The pilot held a private pilot certificate and had accumulated 73 hours as pilot-in-command (PIC).  The pilot was not a flight instructor and was acting as PIC for the entire flight.  The pilot was seated at the right pilot station and the passenger was seated at the left pilot station.  The pilot reported that he had "never piloted from the right position before."  The pilot reported that the passenger flew three landing approaches and each attempt terminated in a go-around maneuver.  After the third landing attempt, the passenger asked the pilot to "demonstrate a landing."  The pilot stated that he assumed aircraft control during the downwind leg for runway 17.  He reported his final approach was flown with full flaps and an uneventful touchdown was made on the runway.  He stated that during rollout the airplane "started to veer toward the right" and that he "incorrectly applied the right rudder instead of left."  The pilot decided to perform an aborted landing in order to "demonstrate a better landing."  The pilot reported he applied full engine power and "lifted the flaps briefly (but not fully)."  He stated that he thought the flaps were "up more" and that he became "flustered" as the airplane "pitched up."  He reported that the airplane "stalled" about 30-50 feet above the ground, and that he was "able to pull the nose up so that we landed hard on the [landing] gear."

## Factual narrative

On February 26, 2005, at 1620 central standard time, a Cessna 172K, N7325G, piloted by a private pilot, was substantially damaged during an in-flight collision with the terrain during an aborted landing from runway 17 (3,775 feet by 60 feet, dry asphalt) at the Portage Municipal Airport (C47), Portage, Wisconsin.  Visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the accident.  The personal flight was operating under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91 without a flight plan.  The pilot reported serious injuries and the passenger reported minor injuries.  The local flight departed C47 at an unconfirmed time.

The pilot reported that the accident flight was with a prospective new flying club member.  The pilot stated that the club required new members complete a check-out flight with a current member.  The prospective new member (passenger) held a student pilot certificate and had flown solo prior to the accident flight.  The pilot held a private pilot certificate and had accumulated 73 hours as pilot-in-command (PIC).  The pilot was not a flight instructor and was acting as PIC for the entire flight.  The pilot was seated at the right pilot station and the passenger was seated at the left pilot station.  The pilot reported that he had "never piloted from the right position before."

The pilot reported that the passenger flew three landing approaches and each attempt terminated in a go-around maneuver.  After the third landing attempt, the passenger asked the pilot to "demonstrate a landing."  The pilot stated that he assumed aircraft control during the downwind leg for runway 17.  He reported his final approach was flown with full flaps and an uneventful touchdown was made on the runway.  He stated that during rollout the airplane "started to veer toward the right" and that he "incorrectly applied the right rudder instead of left."  The pilot decided to perform an aborted landing in order to "demonstrate a better landing."  The pilot reported he applied full engine power and "lifted the flaps briefly (but not fully)."  He stated that he thought the flaps were "up more" and that he became "flustered" as the airplane "pitched up."  He reported that the airplane "stalled" about 30-50 feet above the ground, and that he was "able to pull the nose up so that we landed hard on the [landing] gear."

## Aircraft

- Registration: [N7325G](https://openairdocs.org/deregistered/N7325G-2013-05-07), registration cancelled 2013-05-07, S/N 17259025, built 1970 (OpenAirDocs)
- Reported make and model: Cessna 172K
- Registry model: [Cessna 172K](https://openairdocs.org/model/cessna-172k) (registry code 2072430) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry engine: [Lycoming 0-320 series](https://openairdocs.org/engine/lycoming-0-320-series) (registry code 41508, reciprocating) (OpenAirDocs)
- Category: Airplane
- Serial number: 17259025
- Engines: Lycoming O-320-E2D 150 horsepower reciprocating
- Damage: Substantial damage
- Flight: Personal, Part 91
- Registered owner: Pal Day Aeroclub, Inc.
- Airworthiness certificate: Standard, Utility; Standard, Normal
- Departed: C47, Portage, WI
- Destination: C47, Portage, WI
- Airport: C47, Portage Municipal Airport, runway 17, 3,775 × 60 ft, asphalt

## Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

- Pilot; age 51; injuries: serious; private; airplane ratings: single-engine land; medical: class 3, valid medical--w/ waivers/lim; last flight review March 22, 2003; seat: right; flight hours: 142 total, 119 in this make and model, 73 as pilot in command, 2 in the last 90 days, 1 in the last 30 days, 0 in the last 24 hours

## Weather

- Conditions: Visual (VMC), Day
- Wind: 120° at 8 knots
- Visibility: 10 statute miles
- Lowest ceiling: none
- Temperature: 32 °F, dew point 19 °F
- Altimeter: 30.28 inHg
- Observed at: DLL, 13 nm away

## FAA reports on this event (1)

The FAA's own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date (OpenAirDocs).

- [Accident 20050226004509A](https://openairdocs.org/incident/20050226004509A), Feb 26, 2005: Cessna 172K, Portage, WI, Substantial damage. (-23) While landing, flying from the right seat, the pilot inadvertently applied right rudder. When the airplane began to veer to the right the pilot attempted…

From the NTSB's public API. Aircraft are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported serial number, make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

---
OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.
