# NTSB SEA02FA175: Cessna TR182, Twin Falls, ID, September 15, 2002

- Type: NTSB accident investigation
- Date: September 15, 2002, 16:35 UTC, 10:35 local
- Place: Twin Falls, ID
- Coordinates: 42.48389, -114.488334
- Highest injury: Fatal
- Injuries: 3 fatal
- Status: Completed
- Report: Approved by Office Director, September 30, 2003
- Parties: Cessna Aircraft Corporation, FAA FSDO
- NTSB case key (mKey): 55719
- NTSB case page: https://web.ntsb.gov/investigations/?ntsbnumber=SEA02FA175
- NTSB report (PDF): https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/55719/pdf
- Page: https://openairdocs.org/ntsb/SEA02FA175

## Probable cause

The pilot's failure to maintain runway alignment and his failure to execute a timely go-around maneuver resutling in the aircraft's impacting a parked fuel truck well clear of the runway safety area.  Contributing factors were the strong crosswind/gusty wind conditions and the parked fuel truck.

## Analysis

The 2,200 hour pilot of the Cessna TR182 obtained a weather brief from Great Falls FSS during which he was advised of winds at  his intermediate fuel stop, Twin Falls, Idaho, from 170 degrees at 16 knots.  The pilot contacted Twin Falls tower 13 nautical miles north for landing and was advised that the winds were from 150 degrees magnetic at 20 knots favoring runway 12. Just under 4 minutes later the pilot contacted Twin Falls tower reporting 3 miles out and the controller cleared the aircraft to land on runway 12.  The controller provided no wind information nor did the pilot request any wind information. The  Airport Facility Directory in effect indicated the airport had an Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS) which was keyed to 135.025 megahertz.  Tuning this frequency would enable the pilot to receive continuous meteorological information including wind conditions. However, it was not known whether the pilot utilized this capability. The tower controller reported during the aircraft's approach that it drifted left, and the pilot attempted a go around. A fueler also observed the aircraft in a continuous right wing low attitude as it drifted further left until impacting a parked fuel truck positioned 156 feet outside the runway safety area and 231 feet left of the runway centerline. The fuel truck was one of 4 parked in a marshalling area. The ASOS recorded winds at the time of the accident from160 degrees magnetic at 22 knots gusting to 29 knots with a peak wind reported at the time near the accident of 180 degrees at 29 knots. Runway 12 magnetic centerline was measured at 120 degrees and the Cessna TR182 Wind Components Chart indicated a maximum demonstrated crosswind velocity of 18 knots but noted that this was not a limitation.  No evidence of mechanical malfunction was noted during the on-site examination and the aircraft's gear were found extended with the flaps extended 5 degrees.

## Factual narrative

HISTORY OF FLIGHT

On September 15, 2002, approximately 1035 mountain daylight time, a Cessna TR182, N738GX, registered to Helen and Harold Frisch (trustee), and being operated/flown by one of the owners, a certificated commercial pilot, was destroyed when the aircraft collided with a fuel truck parked at a fuel truck marshalling area at Joslin Field, Twin Falls, Idaho, while attempting a go around maneuver to runway 12.  The pilot and two accompanying passengers sustained fatal injuries during the crash and post impact explosion/fire.  Visual meteorological conditions existed and a VFR flight plan had been filed and activated.  The flight, which was personal, was operated under 14CFR91 and originated from Kalispell, Montana, approximately 0800 on the morning of the accident.  The aircraft was flight planned to Sacramento Executive airport, Sacramento, California, with an intermediate fuel stop at Twin Falls.

The pilot contacted Great Falls Automated Flight Service Station (AFSS) twice on September 14th requesting information on the weather for the return flight to Sacramento.  At 0703, on the morning of September 15th he contacted Great Falls AFSS again and received a weather briefing for the leg to Twin Falls and then on to Sacramento.  The pilot was advised of the enroute weather including a report of winds at Twin Falls from 170 degrees at 16 knots (refer to Attachment AFSS-I).

The pilot first contacted the Twin Falls Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) reporting about 13 nautical miles (nm) north of the field.  The tower controller advised that winds were favoring runway 12, reported the wind from 150 degrees magnetic at 20 knots, altimeter 30.03, and instructed the pilot to contact the tower when three miles north of the field (refer to Attachment AT-I).

Approximately three minutes and 55 seconds later the pilot reported three miles north of the airport and the tower controller cleared N738GX to land on runway 12.  The controller did not provide, nor did the pilot request any further wind information.  There were no further communications to/from the aircraft.

The tower controller reported, "...it appeared the pilot was having problems with the winds and was attempting to go around..." and "...that when he tried to go around the aircraft kept going to the left..." (refer to Attachment C-I).

A line fueler with Reeder Flying Service, who was returning fuel truck number three to its parking position in between fuel trucks one/two and four/five observed the accident sequence.  He reported seeing the aircraft in a continuously right wing low attitude between the time he first observed the aircraft up to the time of the impact with the fuel truck.  He indicated that the angle of bank decreased periodically but that the aircraft was always in a right wing low attitude.  Additionally, the fueler reported "...when it looked as if he was pulling up he was only about five feet of[f] the ground and about 10 - 20 feet away from the fuel truck..." (refer to Attachment F-I).  He also remarked that the winds on the day of the accident were not uncommon for Twin Falls and he estimated the wind between 20 and 25 knots out of the south-southeast.

PERSONNEL INFORMATION

The pilot held a commercial certificate with airplane single engine land and helicopter ratings and an instrument rating for both fixed wing and helicopter.  The pilot's most current FAA medical examination was conducted on August 29, 2001, at which time he was issued a second class medical certificate with the restriction that he "must wear corrective lenses & possess glasses for near & interim vision."

No pilot logs were found or made available to the investigative team and the pilot's total (estimated) flight time of 2,200 hours was based upon that time reported at his last FAA medical examination.  Records indicated that the pilot had acquired the Cessna TR182 on May 27, 1997.

AIRCRAFT INFORMATION

N738GX, a Cessna TR182, was equipped with two 46-gallon fuel tanks (one in each wing).  The aircraft's maximum gross takeoff weight was 3,100 pounds.  No logs, records or weight and balance documentation were available and the manufacturer reported the standard empty weight of the Cessna TR182 model as 1,764 pounds.

The fixed base operator who serviced the aircraft prior to it's departure from Glacier Park International airport, Kalispell, Montana, reported that the aircraft had been fueled with 36.8 gallons of 100 low lead aviation octane fuel on September 13, 2002.  The fuel on board listed on the flight plan (5 hours) from Kalispell, Montana, to Twin Falls, Idaho, was consistent with full fuel tanks (92 gallons).

The weights of all three occupants were provided by the Twin Falls Coroner's Office and derived from automobile drivers license data.  The pilot was reported to weigh out at 195 pounds while the two passengers weighed out at 198 and 190 pounds.  An accurate assessment of the weight of personal effects could not be determined due to the extensive post crash fire.  However, numerous golf clubs were found at the crash site.

The manufacturer provided a "Wind Components" Chart for the Cessna TR182 (refer to Attachment WC-I).  The chart provides a note that reads "Maximum demonstrated crosswind velocity of 18 knots (this is not a limitation)."  The Cessna TR182 flight manual (1979) defines demonstrated crosswind velocity as "the velocity of the crosswind component for which adequate control of the airplane during takeoff and landing was actually demonstrated during certification tests.  The value shown is not considered to be limiting."

METEOROLOGICAL INFORMATION

Aviation surface weather observations taken on September 15, 2002, at Joslin Field were reviewed (refer to Attachment ASWO-I).  The following wind information was noted:

TIME     DIRECTION       SPEED     GUSTS     REMARKS

0753     190 DEG TRUE    12 KTS     20 KTS

0853     180 DEG TRUE    16 KTS

0953     170 DEG TRUE    20 KTS     28 KTS    PEAK WIND 170 @ 28 (0953)

1053     180 DEG TRUE    19 KTS     27 KTS    PEAK WIND 190 @ 30 (1037)

1153     190 DEG TRUE    21 KTS     29 KTS    PEAK WIND 180 @ 31 (1142)

1253     200 DEG TRUE    17 KTS     27 KTS    PEAK WIND 190 @ 29 (1214)

An Automated Surface Observing System (ASOS) was operating at Joslin Field on the date of the accident (refer to Attachment ASOS-I).  The following wind information was noted:

TIME     DIRECTION       SPEED     GUSTS     REMARKS

1035     180 DEG TRUE    22 KTS     29 KTS    PEAK WIND 180 @ 29 (1035)

1040     180 DEG TRUE    20 KTS     30 KTS    PEAK WIND 190 @ 30 (1037)

1045     190 DEG TRUE    22 KTS     30 KTS    PEAK WIND 190 @ 30 (1037)

1050     180 DEG TRUE    21 KTS     27 KTS    PEAK WIND 190 @ 30 (1037)

1055     190 DEG TRUE    17 KTS     24 KTS

1100     190 DEG TRUE    19 KTS     25 KTS

AERODROME INFORMATION

Joslin Field (TWF) was equipped with a primary (instrument) runway (07/25) measuring 8,703 by 150 feet and a (general aviation) runway (12/30) measuring 3,224 by 75 feet.  According to the most recent FAA Form 5010-1 survey, dated August 12, 2002, runway 12/30 was designated as non-air carrier movement area (refer to Attachment 5010-I and Diagram I).  The centerline of runway 120 was measured to be on a bearing of 120/300 degrees magnetic (105/285 degrees true).  The magnetic variation at Joslin Field was about 15 degrees East.  The airport was fully certificated under 14CFR139 and maintained an Index "B" rating.

According to the November 1997 Airport Layout Plan for Joslin Field, runway 12/30 was designated as an approach category "B" and Design Group II runway.  The safety area associated with the runway was designated as 150 wide (+/- 75 about the centerline) and extending the full length of the runway and 300 feet beyond each approach end.

According to the Airport Facility Directory in effect at the time of the accident, the airport's ASOS system was ke

## Sequence of events

- In flight collision with object, go-around (vfr)
  - go-around - delayed, pilot in command (cause)
  - weather condition - crosswind (contributing factor)
  - proper alignment - not obtained/maintained, pilot in command (cause)
  - weather condition - gusts (contributing factor)
  - object - vehicle (contributing factor)
- Fire/explosion, go-around (vfr)

## Aircraft

- Registration: N738GX, a cancelled registration (https://openairdocs.org/deregistered/N738GX-2003-01-10) (OpenAirDocs)
- Reported make and model: Cessna TR182
- Registry model: Cessna TR182 (registry code 2072735, https://openairdocs.org/model/cessna-tr182) (OpenAirDocs)
- Registry engine: Lycoming 0-540 series (registry code 41532, https://openairdocs.org/engine/lycoming-0-540-series) (OpenAirDocs)
- Category: Airplane
- Serial number: R18200926
- Engines: Lycoming O-540-L3C5D 235 horsepower
- Damage: Destroyed
- Flight: Personal, Part 91
- Departed: FCA, Kalispell, MT
- Destination: TWF, Twin Falls, ID
- Airport: TWF, Joslin Field, runway 12
- FAA reports: 20020915026579A (https://openairdocs.org/incident/20020915026579A) (OpenAirDocs)

## Flight crew

- Pilot; age 63; commercial; medical class 2; hours: 2,200 total

## Weather

- Conditions: Visual (VMC), Day
- Wind: 160° at 19 knots, gusting 27
- Visibility (statute miles): 10
- Temperature (°F): 87.8

From the NTSB's public API. Aircraft are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

---
From OpenAirDocs.org, an independent open copy of NTSB and FAA data. The NTSB's own report is the official record of an investigation.
