# NTSB WPR22LA341: Cessna 750, N15TZ, Mesa, AZ, September 7, 2022

- Type: NTSB accident investigation
- Classification: Accident · No injuries · Class 3 · Limited · Final report
- Date: September 7, 2022, 14:53 local (21:53 UTC)
- Place: Mesa, AZ · Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport
- Coordinates: 33.305811, -111.65377 (estimated)
- Nearby events: https://openairdocs.org/map.md?lat=33.3058&lon=-111.6538&mi=10
- Phase of flight: [Initial climb](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-phases/350) (OpenAirDocs' grouping)
- Defining event: [Initial climb: Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power)](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/330)
- Highest injury: No injuries
- Injuries: 2 uninjured
- Status: Completed
- Report: Approved by Office Director
- Investigation class: Class 3
- NTSB office: Western Pacific Region
- Parties: FAA-FSDO, Textron Aviation
- NTSB case key (mKey): 105905
- NTSB case page: https://web.ntsb.gov/investigations/?ntsbnumber=WPR22LA341
- NTSB report (PDF, downloads): https://data.ntsb.gov/carol-repgen/api/Aviation/ReportMain/GenerateNewestReport/105905/pdf
- NTSB docket: https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=105905
- Page: https://openairdocs.org/ntsb/WPR22LA341

## Probable cause

The pilot’s improper decision to depart on the accident flight with a known hydraulic leak, resulting in an in-flight hydraulic system failure, and the pilot’s attempt to land during an unstabilized approach, which resulted in a loss of control during the landing roll.

## Findings

NTSB's coded findings; those marked are part of the probable cause.

- [Hydraulic power system: hydraulic, main system](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01022910): Aircraft › Aircraft systems · Failure (probable cause); cases with it: [Cessna 750, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01022910/cases.md?model=2076810), [All aircraft, 27 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01022910/cases.md)
- [Info processing/decision: decision making/judgment](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02041520): Personnel issues › Action/decision · Pilot (probable cause); cases with it: [Cessna 750, 2 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02041520/cases.md?model=2076810), [All aircraft, 3,098 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02041520/cases.md)
- [Info processing/decision: decision making/judgment](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02041520): Personnel issues › Action/decision · Copilot; cases with it: [Cessna 750, 2 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02041520/cases.md?model=2076810), [All aircraft, 3,098 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02041520/cases.md)
- [Info processing/decision: decision making/judgment](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02041520): Personnel issues › Action/decision · Cabin crew; cases with it: [Cessna 750, 2 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02041520/cases.md?model=2076810), [All aircraft, 3,098 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02041520/cases.md)
- [Fluids: hydraulic fluid](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01071015): Aircraft › Fluids/misc hardware · Related operating info (probable cause); cases with it: [Cessna 750, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01071015/cases.md?model=2076810), [All aircraft, 33 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01071015/cases.md)
- [Knowledge: knowledge of equipment](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02032015): Personnel issues › Experience/knowledge · Cabin crew; cases with it: [Cessna 750, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02032015/cases.md?model=2076810), [All aircraft, 69 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02032015/cases.md)
- [Use of equip/info: use of checklist](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02063030): Personnel issues › Task performance · Cabin crew; cases with it: [Cessna 750, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02063030/cases.md?model=2076810), [All aircraft, 336 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02063030/cases.md)
- [Communication (personnel): cRM/MRM techniques](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02063540): Personnel issues › Task performance · Cabin crew; cases with it: [Cessna 750, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02063540/cases.md?model=2076810), [All aircraft, 26 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02063540/cases.md)
- [Use of equip/info: use of equip/system](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02063015): Personnel issues › Task performance · Pilot (probable cause); cases with it: [Cessna 750, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02063015/cases.md?model=2076810), [All aircraft, 1,391 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/02063015/cases.md)
- [Performance/control parameters: airspeed](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01062010): Aircraft › Aircraft oper/perf/capability · Incorrect use/operation (probable cause); cases with it: [Cessna 750, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01062010/cases.md?model=2076810), [All aircraft, 1,681 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-findings/01062010/cases.md)

## Sequence of events

The events NTSB coded, in order, by phase of flight. The defining event best describes what happened.

- [Initial climb: Sys/Comp malf/fail (non-power)](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/330) (defining event); cases with it: [Cessna 750, 1 case](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/330/sequence.md?model=2076810), [All aircraft, 994 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/330/sequence.md)
- [Landing-landing roll: Runway excursion](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/300); cases with it: [Cessna 750, 2 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/300/sequence.md?model=2076810), [All aircraft, 3,643 cases](https://openairdocs.org/ntsb-events/300/sequence.md)

## Analysis

The pilot and copilot departed on a repositioning flight in the twin-engine jet with a known hydraulic leak. The leak was identified before the flight, but the origin of the leak was unknown at the time. Shortly after departing, the landing gear would not retract. The pilots troubleshot the problem, attempted to retract the landing gear multiple times, and realized they had lost the hydraulic fluid in the system used for gear retraction. The flight diverted to an alternate airport; during the landing, the left landing gear tire blew out and the wheel and tire wore down to near the axle on one side of the wheel. The airplane came to rest near the runway and the right main landing gear collapsed. A postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the nose landing gear centering hydraulic flexible line was frayed and leaked near the upper fitting. This damage resulted in the complete depletion of the hydraulic System A fluid during the crew’s multiple attempts to retract the gear during flight. The cockpit voice recorder (CVR) was downloaded and revealed that, after the landing gear was confirmed in the down position, the pilot reported that they had all the flaps possible extended since they were limited to 15° (per the airplane flight manual [AFM] “LANDING WITH NO ‘A’ SYSTEM PRESSURE” checklist). A few minutes later the crew discussed the flaps again and referred to the flight manual before setting the flaps to the full down position, contrary to the checklist. For the airplane’s reported weight at the time of the landing, the reference landing speed (Vref) specified by the checklist was between 137 and 138 knots; however, the Vref airspeed was exceeded by 17 knots, resulting in a fast landing to a runway with a downhill gradient that constituted an unstabilized approach. The fast landing and selection of a runway with a downhill gradient, both contrary to the referenced checklist, likely contributed to the blown main tires and the loss of control during the landing roll.

## Factual narrative

On September 7, 2022, about 1453 mountain standard time, a Cessna 750, N15TZ, was substantially damaged when it was involved in an accident near Phoenix, Arizona. The pilot and co-pilot were not injured. The airplane was operated as a Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 positioning flight. The pilot reported that shortly after departing Tucson International Airport (TUS), Tucson, Arizona, the landing gear would not retract. The pilot contacted air traffic control and requested to divert from the original destination and continue to Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport (IWA), Phoenix, Arizona. Soon after, he noticed that the hydraulic system “A” lost fluid and pressure. The pilot stated they completed the “Landing with No ‘A’ System Pressure” checklist. He reported that the landing on runway 30L was smooth and on speed at Vref, and that he immediately began using the emergency brake. The pilot reported that once the airplane was several hundred feet down the runway, the left main landing gear tires blew out, and that he used the rudder for directional control. At about 6,900 ft down the 10,401 ft runway, the airplane veered left off the runway; the right main landing gear subsequently collapsed. Before the accident flight, when the airplane was parked in TUS, a mechanic reported that he witnessed the accident airplane leaking hydraulic fluid from the nose landing gear area, creating a puddle on the ramp. He reported the leak to one of the pilots, who said they were on their way to Iowa and would fix it there. A video of the landing at IWA revealed that shortly after landing, two bright flashes of light were visible on the left side of the airplane. The airplane continued down the runway and suddenly veered left. According to automated dependent surveillance - broadcast (ADS-B) data, the airplane was on approach with a groundspeed of about 154 knots as it crossed the approach end of runway 30L. (See Figure 1.) Runway 30L is 10,401 ft long, with a downhill gradient of 0.4%. Figure 1-ADS-B Flight Track Data. The CVR recording captured one of the pilots, who was outside the airplane on the parking ramp, saying “it’s not water.” After boarding the airplane and preparing for takeoff, one of the pilots asked about the leak outside. The other pilot confirmed there was a leak but couldn’t identify the source. They also spoke about the right wheel and mentioned that “we’ll probably need to do something about that,” and discussed possibly having a hydraulic leak in the A system. After a flight planning conversation, they discussed the nature of the leak and that the ground crew mentioned it to the pilot outside and confirmed he could see something dripping but couldn’t find its origin. The pilots continued through their preflight checks and mentioned that everything was working properly. They mentioned the hydraulic systems and that they would “leave it up and see if it changes,” and that “as long as we got pressure everything should be fine,” and theywould check the fluid once on the ground to see if it was hydraulic fluid. During the departure from TUS, the landing gear would not retract after multiple attempts. The flight was diverted to IWA and again they attempted to retract the landing gear multiple times. They mentioned to air traffic control (ATC) that the gear was down and that they lost hydraulic System A. A checklist was performed and the power transfer unit (PTU) was “pulled.” They also discussed not having the use of normal braking during the forthcoming landing. They discussed the System A failure and “what hose blew,” and they both confirmed that System A had no fluid. During the communication with Phoenix approach control, the pilot confirmed that there was no emergency. After the landing gear was confirmed in the down position, the pilot reported that they had all the flaps possible extended, and that they were limited to 15°. A few minutes later the crew discussed the flaps again and referred to the flight manual. The flaps were then set to the full down position and, about 15 second before touchdown, the airspeed was called out at “160 knots.” Soon after the airplane landed, ATC notified them that the left main tire was “exploding,” and the pilot replied that they were having a brake problem. The airplane came to rest in the runway safety area near taxiway H, with a directional heading of about 140°. The right wing was resting on the ground and the right main landing gear remained partially attached. The slats and flaps were fully deployed, and the right wing slats were buckled in several areas. The right thrust reverser was deployed, and the fuselage was buckled near the engine pylons. A mechanic who arrived at the accident site to move the wreckage confirmed that hydraulic systems “A” and “B” contained no fluid. While the landing gear handle was in the down position, the “A” hydraulic system was serviced, and when pressurization was stabilized, no leaks were noted. The PTU line near the right landing gear attachment was damaged and hydraulic system “B” would not hold fluid or pressure when serviced. A postaccident examination of the airplane revealed that the nose landing gear centering hydraulic flexible line was frayed and cracked near the upper fitting. The line was removed, and a cap was fastened to the upper fitting. The line was attached to a hydraulic servicing cart and was pressurized with hydraulic fluid. Hydraulic fluid flowed freely from the frayed area. About 1/3 of the left main wheel, tire, and brakes were worn down on one side. The hydraulic system “B” pressure line was damaged, consistent with impact damage from the right main landing gear collapsing The emergency brake handle was pulled twice at the pilot’s seat position and brake pressurization was heard from the left main landing gear. The left main wheel rotated freely on its axle. According to the airplane’s operating manual, the hydraulic system is a dual closed center system. Pumps driven by eachengine supply pressure for operation of the landing gear, nose wheel steering, anti-skid brakes, spoilers, speed brakes, roll control spoilers, elevators, ailerons, lower rudder, and the thrust reversers. The two separate hydraulic systems are identified as the A system and the B system. Redundancy is provided by the fact that the B system can operate the A system through a hydraulic motor/pump unit in which no fluid exchange takes place. An electrically operated auxiliary pump in the A system also provides backup power for equipment powered by that system. Pneumatic backup is also available for landing gear extension and braking. System A may be powered redundantly by two methods. In the event of a left engine or hydraulic pump failure, pressure can be restored to System A through the PTU. The PTU is a hydraulic pump driven by System B pressure. With System B operating at 3,000 psi, the PTU can generate 2,600 ±400 psi to System A. The second backup system is an electrically driven auxiliary pump that can provide 3,000 psi hydraulic pressure to all of System A. Due to low system capacity when the auxiliary pump is the only source of hydraulic power, the landing gear should not be lowered hydraulically or the thrust reversers deployed, since it would result in slow operation of other more critical systems. According to the airplane’s flight manual the maximum certified landing weight is 31,800 lbs. The Vref landing speed during the abnormal procedure, is defined as 1.3 times the stall speed with selected landing flaps of 15°. According to the airplane’s flight manual and the airplane’s reported weight at the time of the landing, the landing speed for the airplane would have been between 137 and 138 knots. The following procedure is from the pilot’s abbreviated checklist for Hydraulic Volume A-B Amber CAS message. HYD VOLUME LOW A-B (HYDRAULIC VOLUME LOW A-B) Indicates a probable leak with low fluid quantity (<16%) and normal or low pressure 1. Hydraulic Pressure and Fluid Quantity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -CHECK 2. HYDRAULIC PUMP “A” or HYDRAULIC PUMP “B” Switch (as applicable) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UNLOAD • IF “A” SYSTEM 3. HYDR B/PTU CONT circuit breaker - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PULL 4. Land as soon a practical. Refer to Emergency/Abnormal Procedures, LANDING WITH NO “A” HYDRAULIC SYSTEM PRESSURE; Tab P2 WARNING DO NOT USE SPED BRAKES IN FLIGHT UNLESS “A” HYDRAULIC SYSTEM PRESSURE IS ZERO. OUTBOARD SPEED BRAKE PANELS MAY NOT RETRACT. PROCEDURE COMPLETED The following procedures are from pilot’s abbreviated checklist for Landing Gear Will Not Retract and Landing With No “A” System Pressure, Red CAS message. LANDING GEAR WILL NOT RETRACT (NORMAL “A” SYSTEM HYDRAULIC PRESSURE) Indicated by failure of red UPLOCK light to extinguish after attempting retract. 1. Landing Gear Handle - - - - - - - - - - - - - DOWN (airspeed below 210 KIAS) 2. LandingGear - - - - - - - - - - CHECK DOWN AND LOCKED (3 green lights) 3. Land as soon as practical, do not retract landing gear. PROCEDURE COMPLETED LANDING WITH NO “A” SYSTEM PRESSURE WARNING • DO NOT EXTEND FLAPS BEYOND 15° WITH EITHER HYDRAULIC SYSTEM DEPRESSURIZED. IF A SPEED BRAKE OR SPOILER CHECK VALVE FAILS TO SEAT, UNCOMMANDED ROLL MAY RESULT. RETRACT FLAPS TO 15° IF EXTENDED. • DO NOT USE SPEED BRAKES IN FLIGHT UNLESS “A” HYDRAULIC SYSTEM PRESSURE IS ZERO. OUTBOARD SPEED BRAKE PANELS MAY NOT RETRACT. BEFORE LANDING 1. Landing Data - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CONFIRM a. Airspeed - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VREF (Flaps 15°) b. Multiply normal FLAPS 15° landing distance by 1.6. CAUTION AVOID LANDING WITH TAILWIND OR DOWNHILL RUNWAY GRADIENT. 2. Crew Briefing - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - COMPLETE 3. Avionics and Flight Instruments - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHECK/SET 4. Minimums - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -SET (RA/BARO) 5. FUEL CROSSFEED Knob - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - AS REQUIRED, then OFF 6. ENG SYNC Knob - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OFF 7. Exterior Lights- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -AS REQUIRED 8. Flaps - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 15° MAXIMUM WARNING DO NOT EXTEND FLAPS BEYOND 15° WITH EITHER HYDRAULIC SYSTEM DEPRESSURIZED. IF A SPEED BRAKE OR SPOILER CHECK VALVE FAILS TO SEAT, UNCOMMANDED ROLL MAY RESULT. RETRACT FLAPS TO 15° IF EXTENDED. 9. Passengers - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BRIEF 10. Seats/Seat Belts/Shoulder Harnesses/ Aft Divider Sliding Doors - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHECK/SECURE/LATCHED OPEN (if belted toilet seat occupied) 11. Passenger Advisory Lights- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PASS SAFETY 12. IGNITION- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - NORM 13. Pressurization- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ZERO DIFFERENTIAL at touchdown 14. Landing Gear - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BLOW DOWN (following blow down the gear cannot be retracted) a. Landing Gear Blowdown Handle- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PULL (below 210 KIAS) b. Landing Gear - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHECK DOWN and LOCKED (3 green lights) c. Gear Handle - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DOWN 15. Speed Brakes - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RETRACTED 16. EICAS - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHECK 17. AIRSPEED- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - VREF (Flaps 15°) LANDING 1. Throttles - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -IDLE 2. Speed Brakes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXTEND at touchdown 3. Elevator Control - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FORWARD PRESSURE at touchdown 4. Feet- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -OFF BRAKE PEDALS 5. Emergency Brake Handle - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PULL and HOLD UNTIL STOPPED after nosewheel ground contact CAUTION • REPEATED APPLICATION AND RELEASE MAY CAUSE PREMATURE LOSS OF PNEUMATIC PRESSURE. • WHEN CLEAR OF THE RUNWAY, STOP AND SHUT DOWN. DO NOT ATTEMPT TO TAXI IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO BUILDINGS OR OTHER AIRCRAFT USING EMERGENCY BRAKES. 6. Right Thrust Reverser - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -DEPLOY WITH IDLE THRUST after nosewheel ground contact CAUTION DO NOT EXCEED IDLE REVERSE THRUST. NOSEWHEEL STEERING WILL BE INOPERATIVE AND USE OF MORE THAN IDLE THRUST MAY RESULT IN LOSS OF DIRECTIONAL CONTROL. PROCEDURE COMPLETED

## Aircraft

- Registration: [N15TZ](https://openairdocs.org/aircraft/N15TZ), registered now, S/N 750-0127 (OpenAirDocs)
- Reported make and model: CESSNA 750
- Registry model: [Cessna 750](https://openairdocs.org/model/cessna-750) (registry code 2076810) (OpenAirDocs)
- Category: Airplane
- Serial number: 750-0127
- Airframe hours: 2774.8
- Engines: Rolls-Royce AS3007C 6442 lbs thrust turbo jet; Rolls-Royce AE3007C 6442 lbs thrust turbo jet
- Damage: Substantial damage
- Flight: Positioning, Part 91
- Operator: BVS, Inc
- Registered owner: Peddler LLC
- Airworthiness certificate: Standard, Transport
- Last inspection: Continuous airworthiness, March 18, 2022, 79 hours before
- Departed: KTUS, Tucson, AZ
- Destination: KCID, Cedar Rapids, IA
- Flight plan: IFR
- Airport: IWA, Phoenix-Mesa Gateway Airport, runway 30L, 10,401 × 150 ft, concrete
- Equipment: Electronic flight bag or handheld device, Auto-pilot, Electronic primary flight display, Onboard weather, Satellite tracking device, ADS-B

## Flight crew

As NTSB recorded them. NTSB leaves out names.

- Pilot; age 72; injuries: none; airline transport, flight instructor, commercial; airplane ratings: multi-engine land, single-engine land; instrument ratings: airplane; medical: class 2, without waivers/limitations; last flight review August 26, 2021; seat: left; restraint: 5-point; flight hours: 15,600 total, 1,200 in this make and model, 15,300 as pilot in command, 25 in the last 90 days, 9 in the last 30 days, 0 in the last 24 hours
- Co-pilot; age 74; injuries: none; commercial, airline transport; airplane ratings: single-engine land, multi-engine land; instrument ratings: airplane; medical: class 2, with waivers/limitations; last flight review December 21, 2021; seat: right; restraint: 5-point; flight hours: 3,500 total, 190 in this make and model, 3,200 as pilot in command, 25 in the last 90 days, 9 in the last 30 days

## Weather

- Conditions: Visual (VMC), Day
- Wind: calm
- Visibility: 30 statute miles
- Temperature: 91 °F, dew point 60 °F
- Altimeter: 2994.00 inHg
- Observed at: IWA
- METAR: METAR KIWA 092147Z 32003KT 10SM BKN080 35/15 A2968

## FAA reports on this event (1)

The FAA's own accident and incident reports, matched to the aircraft by N-number and date (OpenAirDocs).

- [Accident 20220907015589A](https://openairdocs.org/incident/20220907015589A), Sep 7, 2022: Cessna 750, Mesa, AZ, Substantial damage. Aircraft departed tus. On departure discovered loss of hydraulic "a" system and the landing gear would not retract. Crew diverted to iwa where the Cessna…

## Docket (16 files)

The files NTSB released with the investigation on July 10, 2024, on NTSB's docket system: https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket?ProjectID=105905. 16.8 MB in all.

- Pilot/operator aircraft accident report, NTSB form 6120.1 (item 1, PDF, 13 pages, 2.1 MB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=14553146&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=6120_Redacted-Rel.pdf
- Statement from PIC (item 2, PDF, 1 page, 1.2 MB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17192575&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=PIC%20N15TZ_Redacted-Rel.pdf
- Statement from SIC (item 3, PDF, 1 page, 805 KB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17193081&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=SIC%20N15TZ_Redacted-Rel.pdf
- NTSB questions to crew-pic (item 4, PDF, 2 pages, 293 KB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17193326&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=NTSB%20Questions%20-%20David%20Gilbertson%205.10.2024%20%20(2)_Redacted-Rel.pdf
- NTSB questions to crew-sic (item 5, PDF, 3 pages, 6.7 MB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17192585&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=NTSB%20Question%20-%20Joe%20Spreitzer%205.13.2024_Redacted-Rel.pdf
- Record of conversation-bruno (item 6, PDF, 1 page, 48 KB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17203028&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=WPR22LA341%20Maintenance%20Technician%20Record%20of%20Conversation-Rel.pdf
- Record of memorandum-jorgenson (item 7, PDF, 1 page, 66 KB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17203561&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=WPR22LA341%20TUS%20Maintenance%20Technician%20Record%20of%20Conversation-Rel.pdf
- ADS-B flight track images (item 8, PDF, 3 pages, 1.5 MB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17201699&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=ADS-B%20Flight%20Track%20Images-Rel.pdf
- ADS-B flight track data-raw (item 9, CSV, 48 KB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17201916&FileExtension=csv&FileName=n15tz(2of2)%20OpsVue-Rel.csv
- Google earth, ADS-B flight track (item 10, KML, 462 KB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17202187&FileExtension=kml&FileName=N15TZ%20(2of2)%20KML%20OpsVue-Rel.kml
- Photo array-onsite photos (courtesy of the FAA) (item 11, PDF, 4 pages, 556 KB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17201936&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=Photo%20Array-FAA%20Onsite%20Photos-Rel.pdf
- Textron aviation factual report (item 12, PDF, 7 pages, 1.7 MB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17192993&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=Tech%20Report%20750-0127_Redacted-Rel.pdf
- NTSB wreckage examination report (item 13, PDF, 6 pages, 2 photos, 362 KB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17203919&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=WPR22LA341%20Wreckage%20Examination%20-Rel.pdf
- Video (item 14, ASF, 395 KB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17203233&FileExtension=asf&FileName=C-235-R%20GAC%20South%20Apron_1453-1456-Rel.asf
- Cockpit voice recorder - specialist's factual report (item 15, PDF, 11 pages, 173 KB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17344429&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=WPR22LA341_CVR-Rel.pdf
- Statement of party representatives to NTSB investigation-textron aviation (item 16, PDF, 1 page, 248 KB): https://data.ntsb.gov/Docket/Document/docBLOB?ID=17203786&FileExtension=pdf&FileName=Party%20Form-TA_Redacted-Rel.pdf

From the NTSB's public API. Aircraft are matched to registry aircraft by N-number and event date, checked against the reported serial number, make and model; the registry's history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

---
OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.