# Proposed AD 98-CE-57-AD: Withdrawal -- Cessna Aircraft Company 150, 172, 175, 180, 182, 185, 206, 210, and 336 Series Airplanes

- Type: Proposed airworthiness directive (not in force)
- Status: Withdrawn
- Products: Cessna
- Product type: Aircraft
- Action: Proposed rule; Withdrawal.
- Published: December 20, 2001, 66 FR 65666
- Comments due: December 10, 2001
- Docket: 98-CE-57-AD
- FR document: 01-31299
- Official PDF: https://openairdocs.org/files/sha256/01/58/0158347f0e2deeb738a5b1f587adb470b5f19b9673a6dd931aece3645861b1f1 (from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2001-12-20/pdf/01-31299.pdf)
- Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/12/20/01-31299/airworthiness-directives-cessna-aircraft-company-150-172-175-180-182-185-206-210-and-336-series
- FAA DRS: https://drs.faa.gov/browse/excelExternalWindow/5A308158FC07FCFC86256B290067123D.0001
- Page: https://openairdocs.org/proposed/98-CE-57-AD

## Summary

This document withdraws a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) that would have applied to certain Cessna Aircraft Company (Cessna) 150, 172, 175, 180, 182, 185, 206, 210, and 336 series airplanes. The proposed AD would have affected those airplanes equipped with 0513166 series plastic control wheels. The proposed AD would have required you to repetitively inspect these wheels for cracks, conduct a pull test on these wheels, and replace any control wheels that are cracked or that do not pass the pull test. Replacement of the control wheels would have been with ones that were FAA-approved and were not 0513166 series plastic control wheels. After evaluating all the comments received on the proposal, we have determined that the cracking or failure of the control wheel is not a safety hazard and that a special airworthiness information bulletin would be more appropriate. There have been only four service difficulty reports made in the FAA database; however, there were neither associated accidents nor incidents. Most of the affected airplanes have dual control wheels with each wheel having two handles for redundancy, which would provide an alternative means to control the airplane should actual failure occur. For these reasons, we are withdrawing the NPRM.

## Notices in this docket

- Dec 29, 2000: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). (first notice), FR document 00-33230, comments due Feb 2, 2001 (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2000/12/29/00-33230/airworthiness-directives-cessna-aircraft-company-150-172-175-180-182-185-206-210-and-336-series)
- Jan 22, 2001: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); Extension of the comment period., FR document 01-1665, comments due Feb 2, 2001 (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/01/22/01-1665/airworthiness-directives-cessna-aircraft-company-150-172-175-180-182-185-206-210-and-336-series)
- Dec 20, 2001: Proposed rule; Withdrawal., FR document 01-31299, comments due Dec 10, 2001 (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2001/12/20/01-31299/airworthiness-directives-cessna-aircraft-company-150-172-175-180-182-185-206-210-and-336-series)

---
OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.