# Proposed AD FAA-2010-1200: Bombardier, Inc. Model BD-100-1A10 (Challenger 300) Airplanes

- Type: Proposed airworthiness directive (not in force)
- Status: Became AD 2011-07-10
- Products: Bombardier
- Product type: Aircraft
- Action: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
- Published: December 21, 2010, 75 FR 79984
- Comments due: February 4, 2011
- Became: [AD 2011-07-10](https://openairdocs.org/ad/2011-07-10)
- Docket: FAA-2010-1200 (https://www.regulations.gov/docket/FAA-2010-1200, where comments are filed)
- Project: 2010-NM-136-AD
- FR document: 2010-31972
- Official PDF: https://openairdocs.org/files/sha256/2f/ec/2fecf45f5086e99011ad78c8403d46acb62a6ac067b3c443f0048bee2efc9681 (from https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2010-12-21/pdf/2010-31972.pdf)
- Federal Register: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2010/12/21/2010-31972/airworthiness-directives-bombardier-inc-model-bd-100-1a10-challenger-300-airplanes
- FAA DRS: https://drs.faa.gov/browse/excelExternalWindow/F13B5ECA79B248EA86257800004E19F4.0001
- Page: https://openairdocs.org/proposed/FAA-2010-1200

## Summary

We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above that would supersede an existing AD. This proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:

Investigation of a recent high altitude loss of cabin pressurization on a BD-100-1A10 aircraft determined that it was caused by a partial blockage of a safety valve cabin pressure- sensing port, in conjunction with a dormant failure/leakage of the safety valve manometric capsule. The blockage, caused by accumulation of lint/dust on the grid of the port plug, did not allow sufficient airflow through the cabin pressure-sensing port to compensate for the rate of leakage from the manometric capsule, resulting in the opening of the safety valve. It was also determined that failure of the manometric capsule alone would not result in the opening of the safety valve.

* * * * *

The unsafe condition is possible loss of cabin pressure caused by the opening of the safety valve. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

## Notices in this docket

- Dec 21, 2010: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). (first notice), FR document 2010-31972, comments due Feb 4, 2011 (https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2010/12/21/2010-31972/airworthiness-directives-bombardier-inc-model-bd-100-1a10-challenger-300-airplanes)

---
OpenAirDocs.org is an independent research project of [Contrail Labs](https://contraillabs.com/). It is not affiliated with the FAA or the NTSB. Source documents are U.S. government works in the public domain.