8-2
19. AC 120-98, Operator Information for Incorporating Fuel Tank Flammability Reduction Requirements into a Maintenance and/or Inspection Program.
20. AC 120-102, Incorporation of Electrical Wiring Interconnection Systems Instructions for Continued Airworthiness into an Operator’s Maintenance Program.
21. AC 120-113, Best Practices for Engine Time-In-Service Interval Extensions.
22. AC 121-22, Maintenance Review Boards, Maintenance Type Boards, and Original Equipment Manufacturer/Type Certificate Holder Recommended Maintenance Procedures.
23. AC 135-42, Extended Operations (ETOPS) and Operations in the North Polar Area.
24. FAA Order 8040.4, Safety Risk Management Policy.
25. FAA Order 8900.1, Volume 20, Chapter 5, Section 3, Reliability Programs:
Assessment, Acceptance, Authorization, and Surveillance.
8.3 Other Source References. Refer to A4A MSG-3, Operator/Manufacturer Scheduled Maintenance Development, current edition, available from:
Airlines for America (A4A) 1275 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Suite 1300 Washington, DC 20004 202-626-4000 https://www.airlines.org
8.4 AC Feedback Form. For your convenience, the AC Feedback Form is the last page of this AC. Note any deficiencies found, clarifications needed, or suggested improvements regarding the contents of this AC on the Feedback Form.
Appendix A APPENDIX A. TASK/INTERVAL ADJUSTMENTS-TOP-LEVEL CHART Task/Interval Note 1 Is the task based on certification or other regulatory requirement?
Note 2 Is a revision within End -NO the authority of the Reliability Program?
MSI:
Systems Note 4 Operator Programs:
FEC 5/8 FEC 6/7/9 Zonal/EZAP Structure: L/HIRF Appearance/ Regulatory Authority Note 3 Cleanliness/ or Source Requirement Administrative Tasks Appendix B Appendix C Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Appendix H Appendix I Notes:
1. Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)-derived instructions for continued airworthiness (ICA) should not be treated any differently than any other task unless the STC holder's ICA documents provide specific instructions for interval management. It is a best practice for operators to coordinate with STC holders by providing product performance feedback during analysis initiatives associated with these designs.
2. Examples include: Airworthiness Directive (AD), Certification Maintenance Requirements (CMR), airworthiness limitation item (ALI), airworthiness limitation (AL) tasks, fuel tank safety (FTS) tasks, Failure Effect Category (FEC) 5 or 8 tasks "tagged" as precluding a CMR, etc.
3. Operators should not rely exclusively on type certificate holder (TCH) assignment of FEC codes. An understanding of the functions under analysis and associated consequences of functional failure is beneficial.
4. Maintenance Significant Items (MSI).
A-1
Appendix B APPENDIX B. FAILURE EFFECT CATEGORY (FEC) 5/8 TASKS Note 1. Operators may not delete FEC 5 or 8 tasks. An operator's FEC 5/8TASK1 authority to optimize FEC 5 and 8 tasks is restricted to interval changes only. Analysis of FEC 5/8 tasks should be performed by experienced Verify correct FEC code assignment (MRBR). Contact TCH if FEC personnel meeting the competency code is considered minimum per 2.1.4. incorrect.
Review TCH ICA rules. Do not countermand TCH ICA rules (if applicable). 2 Ensure data selection criteria conforms with guidance in this AC (or as accepted by carrier's CMO).
Consider alternative Is task still is task a lube Appendix task procedures, #No applicable and ·No -Yes→ task de letion, aircraft effective? or filter task?
modification, or consult TCH.
Note 2. FEC 5/8 tasks "tagged" or otherwise identified as satisfying a CCMR: TCHs should have Perform analysis of procedures in place to ensure these tasks are not appropriate data: Scheduled Define and susceptible to escalation beyond the SSA interval maintenance defects resulting implement that would otherwise be required by the CMR. from FEC 8 tasks should be Operators desiring to optimize intervals of these carefully analyzed, since sampling tasks must coordinate with the TCH to ensure the CCMR interval established by the SSA during may not reflect hidden failures in-service operational data program for the task. s certification will not be exceeded. Refer to associated with these tasks. 4 AC 25-19 Is it feasible Does the analysis Note 3. Relative to the targeted substantiate a revised No, or to apply a revised interval to a fleet failure mode and original intent. task interval and Inconclusive sub-set for remain effective?
Referto MSG-3 section 2-3-7.1 sampling?
(Table 2-3-7.1, Criteria for Task Selection) for applicability and safety effectiveness guidance. No Coordinate with the TCH when data from the MSG-3 task analysis is necessary to perform the evaluation. Revise the task interval.
Note 4. Consider communication with TCH to ensure fail-safe design limit is not exceeded.
Schedule a follow-on analysis to validate the task remained effective Retain identity and significance of safety-related tasks such as CMRs, after implementation.
ALIS, AL, FEC 5, and FEC 8.
Note 5. A typical sampling program consists of End a specified number of aircraft, an implementation plan, acceptable performance standards or criteria, performance monitoring and reporting procedures, and a timeline.
B-1
Appendix C APPENDIX C. FAILURE EFFECT CATEGORY (FEC) 6/7/9 TASKS FEC 6/7/9 Task Verify correct FEC code assignment (MRBR). → Contact TCH if FEC code is considered incorrect.
Note 1. Relative to the targeted failure mode and original intent.
Refer to MSG-3 section 2-3-7.1 Is task a Lube —Yes—→ Appendix D or Filter task?
(Table 2-3-7.1, Criteria for Task Selection) for applicability and safety effectiveness guidance.
Coordinate with the TCH when data from the MSG-3 task analysis is Ensure data selection criteria conforms with guidance in necessary to perform the evaluation. this AC (or as accepted by carrier's CMO).
Note 3. A typical sampling program consists of a specified number of Consider alternative Is task still task procedures, •No- applicable and aircraft, an implementation plan, task deletion, aircraft effective? ! acceptable performance standards or modification, or consult TCH. criteria, performance monitoring and reporting procedures, and a timeline.
Define and implement Perform analysis of appropriate data. sampling program for the task. 3 Does the Is it feasible analysis Note 2. Based on current to apply a revised substantiate a No, or performance standards revised task interval Inconclusive interval to a fleet system. and remain sub-set for effective? 2 sampling?
No, or Yes Inconclusive Is the Revise task anticipated scope, type, Yes impact to operational and/or interval. pertormance acceptable?
No Based on risk, schedule a follow-on analysis to validate the task remained effective after implementation.
End C-1
Appendix D APPENDIX D. LUBE/FILTER TASKS Note 1. Consideration volumes, rates of usage or deterioration, and the unit's ability to perform its intended function. Do not assume variables are constant. It is possible that at some Lube/Filter Tasks 1 point, rates may accelerate.
Verify correct FEC code assignment (MRBR). → • Contact TCH if FEC Note 2. Relative to the targeted code is considered failure mode and original intent. incorrect.
Refer to MSG-3 section 2-3-7.1 Ensure data selection criteria conforms with guidance in (Table 2-3-7.1, Criteria for Task this AC (or as accepted by carrier's CMO).
Selection) for applicability and safety effectiveness guidance.
from the MSG-3 task analysis is Coordinate with the TCH when data Is task still Consider alternative necessary to pertorm the evaluation. applicable and effective? 2 task deletion, aircraft task procedures, modification, or consult TCH Note 3. The selected interval should be based on the consumable's usage rate, the amount of consumable in the system (if applicable), and performance deterioration characteristics.
Typical operating environments and climatic conditions are to be considered when assessing the deterioration characteristics.
Consider primary and peripheral purpose of consumable materials (e.g., does it also provide a means of compliance with the operator's aircraft corrosion objectives).
Note 4. If alternative material (lubricants, filter elements, etc.) are considered to extend an interval, consider compatibility of alternative Perform analysis of appropriate data.
products with existing system features and design performance. Caution should be exercised for material compatibility (e.g., lithium grease and compatibility).
Does the analysis Revise task substantiate a scope, type, revised task interval and/or and remain Interval. 3 effective? 2 No Initiate change Does data in consumable *Yes- analysis support introduction material. of alternative consumable material? 4 No End D-1
Appendix E APPENDIX E. ZONAL/ENHANCED ZONAL ANALYSIS PROCEDURE (EZAP) Zonal/EZAP Tasks 1 Review TCH ICA rules. Do not countermand TCH ICA rules (if applicable). 2 Ensure data selection criteria conforms with guidance in this AC (or as accepted by carrier's CMO).
Consider alternative Is task still task procedures, -No- applicable and task deletion, aircraft effective?
modification, or consult TCH. Yes Consider density, type and function (constant and intermittent current loads) of wiring and interconnection systems in the zone under review.
Will interval or task Does the zone scope adjustment maintain contain L/HIRF -Yes- acceptable levels of accumulated and No protection? s potentially flammable contamination? 4 Analysis of L/HIRF and zonal routine task Ensure the analysis includes review of TCH cross findings should take into consideration reference appendices that correlate systems/structures maintaining L/HIRF protection. 6 tasks satisfied by zonal tasks (as applicable).
Perform analysis of appropriate data.
Will the interval and/or task scope adjustment maintain acceptable levels of L/HIRF protection? & Is the task used Does the analysis
•Yes- to take credit for DT *Yes- substantiate a revised for repairs or task interval and remain alterations? effective?
Review previous repair or No alteration records to identify repairs or alterations which may No require individual tracking based No on new interval.
If applicable, Revise task track repairs scope/type and alterations and/or separately interval.
End E-1
Appendix E E-2 Note 1.
- Consider aircraft structure, systems, and installations within the zone to ensure unintended degradation or loss of function will not occur.
- Traceability of revisions to approved electrical wiring interconnection system (EWIS) instructions for continued airworthiness (ICA) to include task, intervals, procedures, protections, and cautions must be maintained.
- As applicable, operators must apply any additional procedures or restrictions based on their compliance document requirements.
- Deletions and task changes (other than task intervals) of EWIS tasks must be approved by the Aircraft Certification Service office via the operator’s Principal Maintenance Inspector (PMI).
- Revisions to EWIS task intervals must be approved by the PMI. (Refer to 14 CFR § 121.1111(e).)
Note 2. Example:
Some zonal tasks may partially satisfy damage tolerance requirements which must be performed at originally-established limits after a certain fatigue threshold. Intervals may be escalated prior to that threshold, but must be adjusted to the original levels at the threshold.
Note 3.
- Relative to the targeted failure mode and original intent.
- Refer to Maintenance Steering Group – 3rd Task Force (MSG-3), volume 1, section 2-3-7.1 (Table 2-3-7.1, Criteria for Task Selection) for applicability and safety effectiveness guidance.
Note 4. This evaluation doesn’t necessarily include the concept of actually measuring contamination or accumulation rates. However, each task adjustment should be sufficiently substantiated, which includes whether the desired results will continue to be achieved at the revised interval. Refer to AC 25-27, AC 120-94, and AC 120-102 for additional information on contaminants.
Note 5. Lightning/High Intensity Radiated Fields (L/HIRF) protection may include:
- Wires, shields, connectors, bonding straps, raceways between connectors.
- L/HIRF protection within conduit or heat shrink or other covering.
- Non-metallic structure with conductive mesh and/or antistatic coatings.
Note 6. Consider:
- The environment and effects of corrosive produces, condensation, temperature, and vibration on the protection.
- Increased susceptibility to damage during maintenance or operations (e.g., where connectors could be stepped on, or effects of deicing fluid on a connectors during winter operations).
Note 7. Awareness of these relationships support a quality analysis. Zonal working groups may have modified zonal intervals to accommodate these interfaces.
Note 8.
- For example, findings associated with bonding straps, lightning wicks, tank plate wiring/connector bonding, etc.
- Ensure unintended consequences such as Environmental Deterioration (ED) or Accidental Damage are not introduced due to frequency of access/egress.
Appendix F APPENDIX F. STRUCTURE Note 1. General Information:
- The actuating portions of items such as landing gear, flight controls, doors, etc. are treated under systems analysis. Structures Tasks'
- Dynamic components such as hinge bearings are treated as system component.
- Attachment fittings of the actuators to the airframe are treated as a structure analysis. insure data selection criteria conforms with guidance ir
- Structure-to-structure attach points, not his AC (or as accepted by carrier's CMO).
otherwise associated with an aircraft system
(e.g., pylon attach fittings and diagonal braces) that feature bearings are be treated as structure. Ensure TCH ICA
- Special consideration should be given to Does the TCHICA document guidance analysis associated with attach points to instructions for structures document contain specific -Yes— → is followed structure since the structural analysis may not program adjustment? (e.g., MPD section provide full consideration for wear and 9), and...
deterioration. These analyses should be compared with the appropriate system analysis, as applicable. NO
- Wear is typically found in/at bushings, bearings, stops, latches, locks, tracks, guides, Ensure data selection criteria conforms with guidance in cams, rollers, cables, pulleys, or floors. Wear can this AC (or as accepted by carrier's CMO).
influence loads and strength, lead to inaccurate positioning and adverse free play or change resistance to environmental deterioration.
Wear can be systematic for parts intended to be Is task still Consider alternative task normally not come in contact or should not be in contact, or random for parts that should applicable and effective? : task de letion, aircraft procedures, subjected to relative motion.
modification, or consult TCH.
- Non-metallic structure is susceptible to damage and/or deterioration such as disbonding and delamination. These structures are not normally susceptible to Perform analysis of appropriate data.
degradation due to the environment
(e.g., corrosion). Special consideration should be given for non-metallic structure and any uniqueness associated with applicable damage sources.
Does the Appendix H. Follow End analysis Is the task AD requirements for No change to task substantiate a a corrosion Is the CPCP interval Yes type, scope, or revised task interval detection AD-mandated? adjustments.
interval. and remain task?
effective?
Note 2.
- Relative to the targeted failure mode and Ensure substantiating data original intent. "Is the task used to take accounts for
- Refer to MSG-3 section 2-3-7.1 credit for DT for repairs or (Table 2-3-7.1, Criteria for Task Selection) for aterations? previous findings and corrective applicability and safety effectiveness guidance. actions. *
- Coordinate with the TCH when data from the MSG-3 task analysis is necessary to perform Note 4. The program is expected to control the evaluation. corrosion to Level 1 or better. Initial programs assume an aircraft is operated in Note 3. Consider all damage sources: records to identify repairs or alferations Review previous repair or alterations a typical environment. If the analysis reflects a trend in corrosion defects that Environmental Deterioration (ED) (corrosion, which may require individual tracking exceed Level 1, the corrosion control stress corrosion, delamination, disbonding, based on new interval. program for the affected area should be etc.); Fatigue Damage (FD); Accidental reviewed by the operator with the Damage; and Wear Damage (WD). objective to ensure Level 1 or better.
Revise task scope/type and/or End accomplishment interval.
F-1
Appendix G APPENDIX G. LIGHTNING/HIGH INTENSITY RADIATED FIELDS (L/HIRF) TASKS Note 1. Coordination with OEM is L/HIRF Task ' recommended. L/HIRF protection may include:
- Wires, shields, connectors, bonding straps, raceways between connectors.
- L/HIRF protection within conduit or Review TCH ICA heat shrink or other covering. rules.
- Non-metallic structure with conductive mesh and/or antistatic coatings.
Ensure TCH ICA rules are followed, if applicable.
Ensure data selection criteria conforms with guidance in this AC (or as accepted by carrier's CMO).
Perform analysis of appropriate data. 2 Note 2: Analysis should consider:
- The environment and effects of corrosive products, condensation, temperature, and vibration on the protection. Does the
- Susceptibility of damage during maintenance or analysis operations (e.g., where connectors could be stepped substantiate a task interval on, or effects of deicing fluid on a connector during and/or scope revision that maintains acceptable levels winter operations.
- Scheduled maintenance findings associated with protection? of L/HIRF bonding straps, lightning wicks, tank plates wiring/ connector bonding, etc.
Yes Revise task scope, type, and/or interval.
End G-1
Appendix H APPENDIX H. OPERATOR PROGRAMS AND APPEARANCE Note 1. This decision tree applies to Operator Program tasks developed and implemented by and Appearance the operator, such as: Tasks 1
- Tasks that support other tasks;
- Administrative support tasks;
- Branding/image objectives; and
- Cabin appearance and cleanliness standards established by the operator. task a response Is this Appendix A; or other defined or is it otherwise related to a deficiency in the Yes- analysis process operator's CAMP?
No Based on risk, determine the data set and analysis needed to evaluate the proposed change.
Does the Is the analysis anticipated impact +No substantiate a acceptable? revised or deleted task?
Yes Delete or revise task scope, type, and/or accomplishment interval End H-1
Appendix I APPENDIX I. REGULATORY SOURCED REQUIREMENTS Regulatory Sourced Task Note 1. Examples include:
AD, CM Rs, AL, AL, FTS tasks.
Does the Ensure regulatory regulatory authority or authority or source source requirement contain specific -Yes-• requirements are followed.
instructions for task adjustment?
No Ensure data selection criteria conforms with guidance in this AC (or as accepted by carrier's CMO).
Note 2. Relative to the targeted failure mode and original intent.
Refer to MSG-3 section 2-3-7.1 analysis substantate Does (Table 2-3-7.1, Criteria for Task adjustment of the task Selection) for applicability and safety interval and remain effectiveness guidance. No effective? * Coordinate with the TCH when data from the MSG-3 task analysis is necessary to perform the evaluation.
Submit proposal to the regulatory authority/ source requirement holder.
Was approval obtained from the regulatory authority/ source requirement holder?
Revise task as approved.
End I-1
OMB Control Number: 2120-0746 Expiration Date:12/31/2027 Advisory Circular Feedback Form Paperwork Reduction Act Burden Statement: A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0746. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 20 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering, and maintaining the data needed, completing, and reviewing the collection of information.
All responses to this collection of information are voluntary. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden to:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.
If you find an error in this Advisory Circular, have recommendations for improving it, or have suggestions for new items/subjects to be added, you may let us know by emailing this form to the Flight Standards Directives Management Officer at 9-AWA-AFB-120-Directives@faa.gov.
Subject: AC 120-17B, Reliability Program Methods—Standards for Determining Time Limitations Date: _____________________ Please mark all appropriate line items:
☐ An error (procedural or typographical) has been noted in paragraph ____________ on page _______.
☐ Recommend paragraph _____________ on page __________ be changed as follows:
☐ In a future change to this AC, please cover the following subject:
(Briefly describe what you want added.)
☐ Other comments:
☐ I would like to discuss the above. Please contact me using the information below.
Submitted by: Date: ______________________ FAA 1320-73 (01/25) SUPERSEDES PREVIOUS EDITIONS