-- application and document the capability in the AFM(S)/RFM(S). Doing so could benefit customers seeking operational approvals.
d. TSO-C129(AR) Class A1 equipment typically supports RNP 1.0 operations associated with instrument approach and departure procedures, but might not support other operations requiring RNP 2.0 or RNP 1.0. TSO-C129(AR) avionics manufacturers should provide an RNP capabilities document stating compliance with the RNP criteria in this chapter for RNP 2.0 and RNP 1.0 capability. Avionics or aircraft manufacturers may provide a service bulletin for a pilot or equipment operating handbook entry, or other notification stating aircraft with this equipment has RNP 2.0 and RNP 1.0 capability based on the avionics manufacturer’s statement of compliance.
Note 1: If the equipment supports RNP 2.0 and RNP 1.0 capability, equipment manufacturers can use their AC 90 100A reference as an acceptable RNP statement of compliance.
Note 2: TSO-C129a has been cancelled so it is not possible to receive a new TSO-C129a TSOA. But equipment with an existing TSO-C129a TSOA may still be produced and installed.
e. Multi-sensor systems that use DME/DME/IRU as the only means of RNP compliance must document the equipment meets the performance and functional criteria in paragraph 9-3. RNP 2.0 approvals are based on GNSS, including GNSS/IRU, due to implementation in remote/oceanic areas. Therefore DME/DME/IRU should not be the basis for any RNP 2.0 approvals.
f. RNP aircraft with P-RNAV approval based on GPS capability meet the functional criteria of this AC for RNP 1.0 operations, such as RNP DPs, RNP SIDs, and RNP STARS.
Note 1: RNP 1.0 operations are based on GPS positioning or DME/DME/IRU if adequate DME coverage is available.
Positioning data from other types of navigation sensors may be integrated with the GPS data provided it does not cause position errors exceeding the TSE budget.
Otherwise, means should be provided to deselect the other navigation sensor types.
Note 2: RNP 2.0 for remote/oceanic operations must meet the continuity requirements associated with a major failure condition.
9-3. Performance and Functional Criteria.
a. Accuracy.
(1) During terminal operations in airspace or on routes designated as RNP 1.0, the lateral TSE must be within ±1 NM for at least 95 percent of the total flight time. The alongtrack error must also be within ±1 NM for at least 95 percent of the total flight time.
(2) Table 9 in chapter 17 indicates allowable “FTE credit” for various RNP operations when using autopilot, flight director, or manual flight control. Applicants may use these FTE values toward meeting TSE for the desired RNP operation without further demonstration or evaluation.
Note: Using a lateral deviation indicator with 1 NM full-scale deflection is an acceptable means of compliance for maintaining TSE. An autopilot or FD may also be used for maintaining TSE, but roll stabilization systems do not qualify.
(3) During enroute operations in airspace or on routes designated as RNP 2.0, the lateral TSE must be within ±2 NM for at least 95 percent of the total flight time. The alongtrack error must also be within ±2 NM for at least 95 percent of the total flight time.
(4) Table 9 in chapter 17 indicates allowable “FTE credit” for various RNP operations when using autopilot, flight director, or manual flight control. Applicants may use these FTE values toward meeting TSE for the desired RNP operation without further demonstration or evaluation.
Note: Using a lateral deviation indicator with 2 NM full-scale deflection is an acceptable means of compliance for maintaining TSE. An autopilot or FD may also be used for maintaining TSE, but roll stabilization systems do not qualify.
b. Integrity.
Malfunction of the aircraft navigation equipment that causes the TSE to exceed 2 times the RNP value without annunciation is classified as a major failure condition under airworthiness regulations (i.e., 10-5 per hour).
c. Continuity.
Loss of function is classified as a minor failure condition for RNP 1.0 if the operator can revert to a different navigation system and proceed to a suitable airport. For RNP 2.0 remote/oceanic airspace applications, loss of function is a major failure condition.
d. Performance Monitoring and Alerting.
The RNP system, or the RNP system and pilot in combination, must provide an alert if the accuracy requirement is not met, or if the probability that the lateral TSE exceeds:
(1) 2 NM is greater than 10-5 for RNP 1.0 operations; or,
(2) 4 NM is greater than 10-5 for RNP 2.0 operations.
e. Path Definition.
RNP equipment should provide lateral guidance so aircraft remain within the lateral boundaries of the defined RNP route. Aircraft performance should comply with RTCA/DO-236C, Chg 1.
f. Signal-in-Space.
If using GNSS, the aircraft navigation equipment must provide an alert if the probability of signal-in-space errors causing a lateral position error greater than:
(1) 2 NM exceeds 10-7 per hour for RNP 1.0 operations; or,
(2) 4 NM exceeds 10-7 per hour for RNP 2.0 operations.
g. Functional Criteria of Navigation Data Displays.
(1) The RNP system must have the following navigation displays and functions installed in accordance with this AC.
(2) Navigation data, including a TO/FROM indication and a failure indicator, must be displayed on a lateral deviation display (CDI, EHSI) and/or a navigation map display.
These must be used as primary flight instruments for aircraft navigation, for maneuver anticipation, and for failure/status/integrity indication. A non-numeric lateral deviation display (for example, CDI, EHSI), with a TO/FROM indication and a failure annunciation, used as primary flight instruments for aircraft navigation, for maneuver anticipation, and for failure/status/integrity indication, should have the following attributes:
Note: See paragraph 8-3.g(2) for TO/TO navigation computer displays.
(a) The displays must be visible to the pilot and located in the primary field of view when looking forward along the flight path.
(b) The lateral deviation display scaling must agree with any alerting and annunciation limits.
(c) The lateral deviation display must have a full-scale deflection suitable for the current phase of flight and must be based on the required total system accuracy. Scaling of 66
±1 NM for RNP 1.0 and ±2 NM for RNP 2.0 is acceptable. It is also acceptable for the scaling to be more conservative; for example, ±1.0 NM for an RNP 2.0 route.
(d) The display scaling may be set automatically by default logic or set to a value obtained from a navigation database. The full-scale deflection value must be known or must be available for display to the pilot.
(e) The lateral deviation display must be automatically slaved to the RNP computed path. It is recommended that the course selector of the deviation display be automatically slewed to the RNP computed path.
Note: This does not apply for installations where an electronic map display contains a graphical display of the flight path and path deviation.
(f) As an alternate means, a navigation map display may be used. The navigation map display must give equivalent functionality to a lateral deviation display with appropriate map scales (scaling may be set manually by the pilot). To be approved as an alternative means, the navigation map display must be shown to meet the TSE criteria and be located in the primary field of view.
(3) It is not necessary for navigation displays, particularly primary flight displays, to include an actual navigation performance (ANP) or RNP accuracy value. The displays only need to provide an alert if the RNP criteria for the operation cannot be met.
h. System Capabilities.
The following are the minimum system capabilities needed in RNP 1.0 or RNP 2.0 equipment:
(1) The capability to continuously display to the pilot flying, on the primary flight instruments for navigation of the aircraft (primary navigation display), the RNP computed desired path and aircraft position relative to the path. For operations where the required minimum flight crew is two pilots, a means for the pilot not flying must also be provided to verify the desired path and the aircraft position relative to the path.
(2) A navigation database, containing current navigation data officially promulgated for civil aviation, which can be updated in accordance with the AIRAC cycle. The stored resolution of the data must be sufficient to achieve the required track keeping accuracy.
The database must be protected against pilot modification of the stored data.
(3) The means to display the validity period of the navigation data to the pilot.
(4) The means to retrieve and display data stored in the navigation database relating to individual waypoints and navigation aids, so the pilot can verify the route to be flown.
(5) For RNP 1.0, the capability to load from the database into the RNP system the entire segment of the SID, ODP, or STAR to be flown.
Note: Due to variability in systems, this document defines the segment from the first occurrence of a named waypoint, track, or course to the last occurrence of a named waypoint, track, or course. Heading legs prior to the first named waypoint or after the last named waypoint do not have to be loaded from the database.
(6) The means to display the following items, either in the pilot’s primary field of view, or on a readily accessible display page:
(a) The active navigation sensor type;
(b) The identification of the active (To) waypoint;
(c) The ground speed or time to the active (To) waypoint; and
(d) The distance and bearing to the active (To) waypoint.
(7) The capability to execute a “Direct to” function.
(8) The capability for automatic leg sequencing with display to the pilots.
(9) The capability to execute RNP 1.0 terminal procedures extracted from the onboard database including the capability to execute fly-over and fly-by turns.
(10) The system must have the capability to automatically execute leg transitions and maintain tracks consistent with the following ARINC 424 path terminators:
(a) Initial fix (IF) (only for RNP 1.0);
(b) Course to fix (CF);
(c) Direct to fix (DF); and
(d) Track to fix (TF).
Note: Path terminators are defined in ARINC Specification 424, and their application is described in more detail in RTCA documents DO-236C Chg 1, DO-283B (as modified by TSO-C115d) and RTCA/DO-201A.
(11) The system must have either an automatic or a manual capability to fly the aircraft on a heading to intercept a course or to go direct to another fix after reaching a procedure-specified altitude. The system may use heading to altitude (VA), heading to manual 68
(VM) and heading to intercept (VI) path terminators for automatic capability.
(12) The system must have either an automatic leg transition capability or a manual capability to permit the pilot to readily designate a waypoint and select a desired course to or from a designated waypoint. The system may use course to altitude (CA) and fix to manual termination (FM) path terminators for automatic capability.
(13) The capability to load a procedure from the database, by procedure name, into the area navigation system.
(14) The capability to display an indication of the RNP system failure in the pilot’s primary field of view.
(15) The capability to indicate to the crew when the NSE alert limit is exceeded
(i.e., the alert provided by the “onboard performance monitoring and alerting function”).
i. Database Integrity.
The navigation database suppliers must comply with AC 20-153(latest revision). A Type 2 LOA, issued by the appropriate regulatory authority, demonstrates compliance with the criteria. Type 2 LOAs issued prior to this AC are considered compliant.
9-4. System Eligibility and Approval for RNP 2.0 and RNP 1.0 Operations.
Systems meeting the criteria in paragraphs 9-2 and 9-3 are eligible for RNP 2.0 and RNP 1.0 operations.
9-5. Rotorcraft Enroute, Terminal, and Offshore RNP 0.3.
9-5.1 Introduction.
Section 9.5 provides guidance on the performance and functional criteria for rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 and the installed GPS/SBAS equipment, at a minimum, must meet the criteria for RNP 2.0, RNP 1.0 and RNP APCH to LNAV minima. The intent is to use rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 capability for enroute, terminal, departure, arrival, and offshore rotorcraft operations. Rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 is based on GPS/SBAS equipage and the rotorcraft must be approved for IFR operations. The reason is to take advantage of the known functionality, performance and availability GPS/SBAS provides. It is not acceptable to use GPS or DME/DME/IRU for rotorcraft rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 operations.
9-5.2 Rotorcraft and System Eligibility for Rotorcraft Enroute RNP 0.3 Operations.
a. The rotorcraft must be approved for IFR operations. Any limitations required for normal IFR operation such as a functioning stability augmentation system, multiple crewmembers, autopilot coupling, etc. will also apply to rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3.
b. GPS/SBAS stand-alone equipment must be approved in accordance with TSO-C146(AR) Class 1, 2, or 3. These systems must be installed for IFR use in accordance 69
with this AC.
c. GPS/SBAS sensors used in multi-sensor system equipment (e.g., FMS) must be approved in accordance with TSO-C145(AR) Class 1, 2, or 3. These systems must be installed for IFR use in accordance with this AC.
d. Multi-sensor systems must be approved in accordance with TSO-C115b (or later revision), but may also have a TSO-C146(AR) Class Gamma approval (see paragraphs 3-2.g and 3-4). The GPS/SBAS sensors and multi-sensor equipment must comply with the applicable GPS/SBAS equipment chapters and chapters 6, 12-14, 16, 19-20, and 22 of this AC and be installed for IFR use in accordance with this AC.
9-5.3 Performance and Functional Criteria.
a. Accuracy.
(1) During operations on rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 routes, the lateral TSE must be within ±0.3 NM for at least 95 percent of the total flight time. The along-track error must also be within ±0.3 NM for at least 95 percent of the total flight time. To satisfy the accuracy requirement, the FTE should not exceed 0.25 NM (see paragraph 9-5.3.i).
(2) Table 9 in chapter 17 indicates allowable “FTE credit” when using an autopilot and/or flight director.
b. Integrity.
Malfunction of the aircraft navigation equipment that causes the TSE to exceed 2 times the RNP value without annunciation is classified as a Major failure condition.
c. Continuity.
(1) Loss of function is classified as a Major failure condition for offshore and remote area operations. The rotorcraft must have dual, independent long-range navigation system equipage for offshore and remote area operations.
(2) Loss of function is classified as a Minor failure condition for domestic rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 operations if the operator can revert to a different navigation system and proceed safely to a suitable airport.
d. Performance Monitoring and Alerting.
During rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 operations, the RNP system must provide an alert if the accuracy requirement is not met or if the probability that the lateral TSE exceeds 0.6 NM is greater than 10-5 .
e. Path Definition.
RNP equipment should provide lateral guidance so aircraft remain within the lateral boundaries of the defined RNP route (see also paragraph 9-5.3.h.7). Aircraft performance should comply with RTCA/DO-236C, Chg 1.
f. Signal-in-Space.
The aircraft navigation equipment must provide an alert if the probability of signal in-space errors causing a lateral position error greater than 0.6 NM exceeds 10-7 per hour.
g. Functional Criteria for Navigation Displays.
(1) The rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 system must have the following navigation displays and functions installed in accordance with this AC.
(2) Navigation data, including a TO/FROM indication and a failure indicator, must be displayed on a lateral deviation display (course deviation indicator (CDI), electronic horizontal situation indicator (EHSI)) and/or a navigation map display. These must be used as primary flight instruments for aircraft navigation, for maneuver anticipation, and for failure/status/integrity indication.
Note: See paragraph 8-3g(2) for guidance on RNP systems
with navigation computers using TO/TO navigation algorithms.
(a) The displays must be visible to the pilot and located in the primary field of view when looking forward along the flight path.
(b) The lateral deviation display scaling must agree with the RNP 0.3 alerting and annunciation limits.
(c) The lateral deviation display must have ±0.3 NM full-scale deflection based on the required total system accuracy.
(d) The display scaling may be set automatically by default logic; automatically to a value obtained from a navigation database; or manually by flight crew procedures. The fullscale deflection value must be known or must be available for display to the pilot commensurate with the required accuracy.
(e) The lateral deviation display must be automatically slaved to the RNP computed path. It is recommended that the course selector of the deviation display be automatically slewed to the RNP computed path.
Note: This does not apply for installations where an electronic map display contains a graphical display of the flight path and path deviation.
(f) As an alternate means, a navigation map display must give equivalent functionality to a lateral deviation display with appropriate map scales (scaling may be set manually by the pilot), and giving equivalent functionality to a lateral deviation display. To be approved as an alternative means, the navigation map display must be shown to meet the TSE criteria and be located in the primary field of view.
h. System Capabilities.
The following system capabilities must be provided, as a minimum, within any rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3-capable equipment:
(1) The capability to continuously display to the pilot flying, on the primary flight instruments for navigation of the aircraft (primary navigation display), the RNP computed desired path and aircraft position relative to the path. For operations where the required minimum flight crew is two pilots, a means for the pilot not flying must also be provided to verify the desired path and the aircraft position relative to the path.
(2) A navigation database, containing current navigation data officially promulgated for civil aviation, which can be updated in accordance with the AIRAC cycle. The stored resolution of the data must be sufficient to achieve the required track keeping accuracy.
The database must be protected against pilot modification of the stored data.
(3) The means to display the validity period of the navigation data to the pilot.
(4) The means to retrieve and display data stored in the navigation database relating to individual waypoints and navigation aids, so the pilot can verify the route to be flown.
(5) The capability to load from the database into the rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 system the entire segments of the procedures or routes to be flown. It is acceptable to manually load route waypoints from the database into a flight plan page and manually set the scaling and alerting.
Note: Due to variability in systems, this document defines the segment from the first occurrence of a named waypoint, track, or course to the last occurrence of a named waypoint, track, or course. Heading legs prior to the first named waypoint or after the last named waypoint do not have to be loaded from the database.
(6) The means to display the following items, either in the pilot’s primary field of view, or on a readily accessible display page:
(a) The active navigation sensor type;
(b) The identification of the active (To) waypoint;
(c) The ground speed or time to the active (To) waypoint; and
(d) The distance and bearing to the active (To) waypoint.
(7) The capability to execute RNP 0.3 routes using waypoints extracted from the onboard database including the capability to execute fly-by turns.
Note: The final waypoint used at the end of RNP 0.3 routes may designate a specific crossing point; that is, a fly over waypoint. There is no intent to use fly-over turns on RNP 0.3 routes
(8) The capability to automatically execute leg transitions and maintain tracks consistent with the following ARINC 424 path terminators:
(a) Initial fix (IF);
(b) Course to fix (CF);
(c) Direct to fix (DF); and
(d) Track to fix (TF).
Note: Path terminators are defined in ARINC Specification 424, and their application is described in more detail in RTCA documents DO-236C Chg 1, DO 283B (as modified by TSO-C115d) and DO-201A.
(9) The capability to automatically or manually fly on a heading to intercept a course or to go direct to another fix after reaching a procedure-specified altitude. The system may use heading to altitude (VA), heading to manual (VM) and heading to intercept (VI) path terminators for automatic capability.
(10) The capability to automatically or manually permit the pilot to readily designate a waypoint and select a desired course to or from a designated waypoint. The system may use course to altitude (CA) and fix to manual termination (FM) path terminators for automatic capability.
(11) The capability to display an indication of the RNP 0.3 system failure in the pilot’s primary field of view.
(12) The capability to indicate to the crew when the NSE alert limit is exceeded (alert provided by the “onboard performance monitoring and alerting function”).
(13) The capability for the flight crew to build an enroute or offshore segment in the equipment flight plan function using individual waypoints from the database. This is similar to existing enroute capability.
Note: It is also acceptable for the navigation system to automatically load all route waypoints from the database by selecting the route name.
i. Flight Director/Autopilot.
For all rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 operations, the use of an autopilot and/or FD is an acceptable means of complying with the FTE assumption in paragraph 9-5.3.a(1). Any alternate means of FTE bounding, other than autopilot and/or FD, may require FTE substantiation through an airworthiness demonstration.
Note: Some rotorcraft may need a stability augmentation system to achieve 0.25 NM FTE during manual flight.
j. Database Integrity.
The navigation database suppliers must comply with AC 20-153(latest revision).
The GPS/SBAS TSOA provides sufficient evidence for compliance to AC 20-153(latest revision), but GNSS operational approval for IFR use is based upon a database assurance process through a type 2 LOA (see paragraph 19-8).
9-5.4 Approval for Rotorcraft RNP 0.3 Operations.
a. The GPS/SBAS-enabled navigation system equipment manufacturer should provide an RNP capability statement that the equipment meets the performance and functional criteria in paragraph 9-5.3 for rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 operations. If provided, an RNP capability statement must include a description of the equipment procedures for pilots to select the rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 capability. The equipment manufacturer may provide the RNP capability statement through a service bulletin or equivalent document and list the GPS/SBAS equipment model(s) that meet the criteria in section 9-5 and are eligible for rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 operations.
b. The GPS/SBAS equipment must be installed according to a TC, ATC, or STC and any rotorcraft limitations required for IFR operations also apply to rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 capability. As an example to illustrate the point, a single-pilot rotorcraft could have a limitation to use an autopilot when conducting IFR operations. This limitation would also apply to rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 capability.
c. Applicants for new GPS/SBAS approvals should consider including rotorcraft enroute RNP 0.3 capability as part of their application and document the capability in the RFM(S). Doing so could benefit customers seeking operational approvals.
Chapter 10. Equipment Performance – RNP Oceanic
10-1. Introduction.
a. This chapter provides guidance for RNP 10 and RNP 4.0 equipment approvals in oceanic areas. RNP 10 supports 50 NM lateral and 50 NM longitudinal separations in oceanic or remote areas without reliance on ground-based navigation aids. Paragraph 10-2 describes the performance and system criteria equipment must meet for RNP 10 and reflects the criteria in the ICAO Performance-based Navigation (PBN) Manual.
b. RNP 4.0 supports 30 NM lateral and 30 NM longitudinal separations in oceanic areas. GNSS is the primary navigation sensor supporting RNP 4.0 operations either as a stand alone system or part of a multi-sensor system. Paragraph 10-3 describes the performance and functional criteria equipment must meet for RNP 4.0 and reflects the criteria in the ICAO PBN Manual.
10-2. Aircraft and System Criteria for RNP 10.
Operational implementation of RNP 10 is an application of RNAV supporting 50 NM lateral and 50 NM longitudinal distance-based aircraft separation minima in oceanic or remote airspace. As an RNAV application, there is no requirement for onboard performance monitoring and alerting. Aircraft operating in RNP 10 oceanic and remote areas must be equipped with at least two independent and serviceable long-range navigation systems using INS/IRU and/or GNSS.
10-2.1 Performance Criteria.
a. Accuracy.
(1) During operations in airspace or on routes designated as RNP 10, the lateral TSE must be within ±10 NM for at least 95 per cent of the total flight time. The along-track error must also be within ±10 NM for at least 95 per cent of the total flight time.
(2) The navigational positioning error is the dominant contributor to cross-track and along-track error for aircraft capable of coupling the navigation system to the flight director or autopilot. A manufacturer or operator may consider FTE, path definition error, and display errors insignificant when obtaining an RNP 10 operations approval.
b. Integrity.
Malfunction of the aircraft’s long-range navigation equipment without annunciation is a major failure condition (i.e., the probability of a malfunction with no annunciation must be less than 10-5 per hour).
c. Continuity.
Loss of function of the long-range navigation equipment is a major failure condition for oceanic and remote operations. Dual independent long- range navigation system equipage 75