7/30/97 АС 27-1A air. Windshear is usually an indication of unstable air or a temperature inversion and must also be avoided. The climbs are flown on reciprocal headings for approximately 5 minutes or through an altitude band using maximum continuous power at a constant airspeed. Periodic power adjustments may be necessary. Additional reciprocal heading climbs must also be conducted at different airspeeds above and below the airspeed at the lowest point of the power required versus airspeed curve. This technique can be repeated at different altitudes to obtain Vy throughout the altitude range.
(2) Level flight performance (speed power) may also be used to determine Vy.
The testing should be done in smooth air. The advantage of this method is that less time is required, and the accuracy is equivalent to the sawtooth climb method. The test can be repeated at various altitudes to determine the Vy throughout the altitude range desired for the rotorcraft. The test at each altitude should be conducted at a constant weight over sigma (W/o). The test is normally started at the desired W/o with maximum continuous power, or at VNE, in level flight. A series of points should be taken, reducing airspeed 10 to 15 knots between points, with the lowest speed point around 20 to 30 knots. Weight should be computed for each point and the test altitude adjusted to maintain a constant W/o. After the data are reduced to standard day conditions, the minimum power required airspeed will be the Vy speed.
(3) Prior to the flight test, the rotorcraft should be ballasted to the desired gross weight and the critical center of gravity. The airspeed should be stabilized prior to data acquisition. Data to be recorded includes time, altitude, airspeed, ambient temperature, engine parameters, torque(s), rotor RPM, fuel reading, aircraft heading, external configuration, etc. Power setting, weight, and climb airspeed should be planned prior to flight. For some turboshaft engines, temperature and/or engine speed limits may be reached prior to a limiting torque. The test team should verify that the resulting power utilized in these tests closely approximates the power producing capabilities of a minimum installed specification engine.
c. Procedure to Determine All-Engine-Operating Climb Performance.
(1) Background. Continuous climbs are conducted at the appropriate climb airspeeds as outlined above in order to validate the rotorcraft's climb performance.
By-products are a qualitative evaluation of the rotorcraft handling characteristics in a climb and engine data to assist in the determination of installed power available.
(2) Techniques. The climbs are conducted on reciprocal headings at the established airspeed(s) through the target altitude range. The same parameters are recorded as during sawtooth climbs. The rotorcraft will usually climb very rapidly during the first few thousand feet; therefore, the data acquisition method must be timely if accurate results are expected. This procedure is usually repeated at weight extremes.
The resulting data must then be corrected for power and weight. Power and weight Par 63 83
corrections are satisfactory, provided the test powers and weights closely approximate the target values to make the weight and power corrections small. Once this data is finalized and corrected for all the flight test variables, interpolation for intermediate weights can be made with a high degree of reliability. If the rotorcraft has any stability augmentation system, vent systems, etc., which may influence the climb performance, then it must be accounted for. Caution should be taken that anti-ice, air-conditioning, etc., are not on unless the performance is being established specifically for those conditions.
63A. § 27.65 (Amendment 27-33) CLIMB: ALL ENGINES OPERATING.
a. Explanation. Amendment 27-33 added the requirement to determine the steady rate of climb, for helicopters, from sea level up to the maximum altitude for which certification is requested. Although not specifically stated in the rule, the rate of climb should be determined at Vy or, if VNE at any altitude is less than the maximum gross weight sea level standard day condition Vy, the steady rate of climb at these altitudes must be determined at a climb speed(s) selected by the applicant not to exceed VNE-
b. Procedures. The policy material pertaining to the procedures outlined in this section remain in effect.
64. § 27.67 (Amendment 27-23) CLIMB: ONE ENGINE INOPERATIVE.
a. Explanation.
(1) Section 27.67 requires that for multiengine normal category rotorcraft, the steady rate of climb or descent with one engine inoperative must be determined at Vy (or at the speed for minimum rate of descent) for maximum gross weight.
(2) The rate of climb (or descent) will be determined with the critical engine inoperative and the remaining engine(s) at maximum continuous or 30-minute minimum specification installed power available values. The landing gear should be retracted if it is retractable.
b. Procedures
(1) The procedure discussed in Paragraph 63 for all-engines-operating climb performance is also applicable to the OEI condition. For twin-engine rotorcraft that are shown not to have a "critical engine" with respect to performance characteristics, both engines may be used to simulate the appropriate single-engine power available during these tests.
(2) Adequate testing must be accomplished to determine the rotorcraft's OEI climb performance at maximum gross weight for all variations in altitude and temperature for inclusion in the Rotorcraft Flight Manual.
84 Par 63
65. § 27.71 (Amendment 27-21) GLIDE PERFORMANCE.
a. Explanation.
(1) Performance capabilities during stabilized autorotative descent are useful tools to assist the pilot when all engines fail. This information is also useful in determining the suitability of available landing areas along a given route segment.
(2) Two speeds are of particular importance, the speed for minimum rate of descent and the speed for best angle of glide. These speeds along with glide distance information are required as flight manual entries per § 27.1587. The speed for minimum rate of descent is useful for engine failure conditions at higher altitudes and the pilot is required to perform some time-related task, engine restart, float inflation, radio calls, etc. The speed for best angle of glide is a somewhat higher speed that is of particular use when it is necessary to reach a distant landing area. These speeds, when utilized in conjunction with appropriate rotor RPM and glide angle (or rate of descent) can be used to calculate the maximum horizontal distance available from a particular altitude assuming zero wind conditions.
(3) A third speed, recommended autorotation speed, may be provided in addition to minimum rate of descent speed and maximum glide angle speed. The recommended speed for autorotation is usually optimized to assure an effective flare capability and yet be slow enough to allow a controlled, relatively slow touchdown condition. Recommended autorotation speed is ordinarily between the minimum rate of descent and maximum glide angle speeds. The recommended autorotation speed may be provided in the Rotorcraft Flight Manual. The relationship between minimum rate of descent, best glide angle, and recommended autorotation speed is shown in Figure 65-1.
(4) Forward center of gravity is usually critical; however, center of gravity effects should be spot-checked to confirm this for a given design.
b. Procedures.
(1) Tests are conducted at speeds which bracket the anticipated speeds for minimum rate of descent and best glide angle. On a power required plot, the speed for minimum power required approximates the speed for minimum rate of descent. The speed for maximum range glide may be estimated by drawing a tangent from the origin to the power required curve.
(2) Autorotative performance tests may be conducted in conjunction with the climb performance tests. The required data are similar for both tests and it is sometimes convenient and efficient to run alternating climbs and descents through a Par 65 85
desired altitude band. Descents should be conducted on reciprocal headings and results averaged in the same manner as climb performance tests.
(3) A reduction in rotor RPM from the normal power-on value may enhance autorotative performance. If the applicant wishes to develop autorotative performance at RPM values significantly below the governing or power-on range, the practicality of reducing and controlling RPM at the lower value and of then increasing RPM as a landing is approached, must be considered. At low weights and low density altitudes, full down collective may automatically produce lower RPM values and this condition is, of course, acceptable provided the approved power-off RPM range is not exceeded.
(4) During autorotation tests, care must be taken to make certain that no engine power is delivered to the rotor drive system since a very small amount of power can have a large effect on descent performance.
Par 65 86
RATE OF
DESCENT RECOMMENDED
AUTOROTATIONAL SPEED
MINIMUM BEST GLIDE ANGLE
RATE OF DESCENT
AIRSPEED FIGURE 65-1. AUTOROTATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS - TYPICAL Par 65 87
66. § 27.73 PERFORMANCE AT MINIMUM OPERATING SPEED.
a. Explanation.
(1) The word "hover" applies to a rotorcraft that is airborne at a given altitude over a fixed geographical point regardless of wind. Pure hover is accomplished only in still air. For the purpose of this manual, the word "hover" will mean pure hover.
(2) The regulatory requirement for hover performance, § 27.73, refers to hover in ground effect (IGE). For some applications, such as external load operations, hover performance out-of-ground effect (OGE) is necessary; however, it is not required by this section. Hover OGE is that condition, where an increase in height above the ground will not require additional power to hover. Hover OGE is the absence of measurable ground effect. It can be less than one rotor diameter at low gross weight increasing significantly at high gross weight. The lowest OGE hover height at gross weight may be approximated by placing the lowest part of the vehicle one and one-half rotor diameters above the surface.
(3) The objective of hover performance tests is to determine the power required to hover at different gross weights, ambient temperatures, and pressure altitudes.
Using nondimensional power coefficients (Cp) and thrust coefficients (Cy) for normalizing and presenting test results minimizes the amount of data required to cover the rotorcraft's operating envelope.
(4) Hover performance tests must be conducted over a sufficient range of pressure altitudes and weights to cover the approved ranges of those variables for takeoff and landing. Additional data should be acquired during cold ambient temperatures, especially at high altitudes, to account for possible Mach effects.
(5) The hover ceiling for which data should be obtained and subsequently presented in the flight manual should be the same height consistent with the minimum hover height demonstrated during the takeoff tests. Refer to Paragraph 59 for the procedure to determine this hover height.
b. Procedures.
(1) Two methods of acquiring hover performance data are the tethered and the free flight techniques. The tethered technique is accomplished by tethering the rotorcraft to the ground using a cable and load cell. The load cell and cable are attached to the ground tie-down and to the rotorcraft cargo hook. The load cell is used to measure the rotorcraft's pull on the cable. Hover heights are based on skid or wheel height above the ground. During tethered hover tests, the rotorcraft should be at light gross weight. The rotorcraft will be stabilized at a fixed power setting and rotor speed at the appropriate skid or wheel height. Once the required data are obtained, power should be varied from the minimum to the maximum allowed at various rotor RPM. This 88 Par 66
technique will produce a large C/C spread. The load cell reading is recorded for each stabilized point. The total thrust the rotor produces is equal to the rotorcraft's gross weight plus the weight of the cables and load cell plus cable tension. Care must be taken that the cable tension does not exceed the cargo hook limit or load capacity of the tie-down. For some rotorcraft, it may be necessary to ballast the rotorcraft to a heavy weight in order to record high power hover data.
(2) The pilot maintains the rotorcraft in position so that the cables and load cell are perpendicular to the ground. To ensure the cable is vertical, two outside observers, one forward of the rotorcraft and one to one side, can be used. Either hand signals or radio can be used to direct the pilot. The observers should be provided with protective equipment. Positioning can also be accomplished by attaching two accelerometers to the load cell which sense angle or movement along the longitudinal and lateral axes.
Any displacement of the load cell will be reflected on instrumentation in the cockpit, and by reference to this instrumentation, the rotorcraft can be maintained in the correct position. Increased caution should be utilized as tethered hover heights are decreased because the rotorcraft may become more difficult to control precisely. The tethered hover technique is especially useful for OGE hover performance data because the rotorcraft's internal weight is low and the cable and load cell can be jettisoned in the event of an engine failure or other emergency.
(3) To obtain consistent data, the wind velocity should be less than 3 knots as there are no accurate methods of correcting hover data for wind effects. Rotorcraft with high downwash velocities may tolerate higher wind velocities. The parameters usually recorded at each stabilized condition are:
(i) Engine torque.
(il) Rotor speed.
(III) Ambient temperatures.
(iv) Pressure altitude.
(v) Fuel used (or remaining).
(vi) Load cel reading.
(vii) Generator(s) load.
(vili) Wind speed and direction.
As a technique, it is recommended the rotorcraft be loaded to a center of gravity near the hook to minimize fuselage angle changes with varying powers. All tethered hover data should be verified by a limited spotcheck using the free flight technique. The free Par 66 89
flight technique as contained in Paragraph 66b(4) will determine if any problems, such as load cell malfunctions, have occurred. The free flight hover data must fall within the allowable scatter of the tethered data.
(4) If there are no provisions or equipment to conduct tethered hover tests, the free flight technique is also a valid method. The disadvantage of this technique as the primary source of data acquisition is that it is very time consuming. In addition a certain element of safety is lost OGE in the event of an emergency. The rotorcraft must be reballasted to different weights to allow the maximum Cy Cp spread. When using the free flight technique, either as a primary data source or to substantiate the tethered technique, the same considerations for wind, recorded parameters, etc., as used in the tethered technique apply. Free flight hover tests should be conducted at CG extremes to verify any CG effects. If the rotorcraft has any stability augmentation system which may influence hover performance, it must be accounted for.
(5) It is extremely difficult to determine when a rotorcraft is hovering OGE at high altitudes above ground level since there is no ground reference. In a true hover, the rotorcraft will drift with the wind. Numerous techniques have been tried to allow OGE hover data acquisition at high altitudes, all of which have resulted in much data scatter. Until a method is proposed and found acceptable to the FAA/AUTHORITY, OGE hover data must be obtained at the various altitude sites where IGE hover data are obtained. Hover performance can usually be extrapolated up to a maximum of 4,000 feet.
67. § 27.75 (Amendment 27-14) LANDING.
a. Explanation.
(1) This rule incorporates all of the landing requirements for Part 27 rotorcraft.
(2) As with other flight maneuvers, landings must be accomplished with acceptable flight and ground characteristics using normal pilot skills. Reasonable sampling and extrapolation methods are, of course, allowed. General guidance on those subjects is given in Paragraph 58 of this advisory circular. As in other performance areas, engines must be operated within approved limits.
(3) Landing. Approach and landing path requirements are stated in general terms in Paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) of § 27.75. The approach path must allow smooth transition for a one-engine-inoperative landing and adequate clearance from potentially hazardous HV combinations.
(4) All-engine-out landing. Section 27.75(b) contains the certification requirement for "last" engine failure and all-engines-inoperative landing. The rule states that it must be possible to make a safe landing after complete power failure during normal cruise. It is not intended that all engines be failed simultaneously, although Par 66 90
complete power failure has occurred in twin-engine rotorcraft with Category A engine isolation. This requirement assures that in the event of cockpit mismanagement, fuel exhaustion, improper maintenance, fuel contamination, or unforeseen mechanical failures, a safe autorotation entry can be made and a safe power-off landing can be affected. Two separate aspects of this rule are normally evaluated at different times during the test program. The "last" engine failure is normally evaluated during cruise or VNE engine failure testing where instrumentation and critical loading have been established for those test conditions. The all-engine-out landing is ordinarily conducted in conjunction with an HV or landing distance phase where ground instrumentation and safety equipment are available.
b. Procedures.
(1) Instrumentation/Equipment. Aircraft instrumentation may include engine and flight parameters, control positions, power lever position, and landing gear loads. A record of rotor RPM at touchdown is necessary to assure it does not exceed transient limits. Rotor RPM at touchdown may be lower than the minimum transient limit for flight, provided stress limits are not exceeded. A crash recovery team with the support of a fire engine is highly desirable.
(2) The one-engine-inoperative landing is similar in many respects to the HV tests described in paragraph 69 of this advisory circular. Most of the comments, cautions, and techniques for HV also apply here even though the typical flight conditions are less critical than limiting HV points due to a lower power level and an established rate of descent. The approach is made at a predetermined speed with one engine inoperative. The speed is reduced and the rotorcraft is flared to a conventional one-engine-inoperative landing.
(3) Power. Power should be limited to minimum specification values on the operating engine(s). This may be accomplished by adjustment of engine topping to minimum specification values for the range of atmospheric variables to be approved.
This is frequently done by installing an adjustable device in the throttle linkage with a control in the cockpit so that engine topping can be accurately adjusted for varying ambient conditions. With such a device in the control system it becomes vitally important to check topping power prior to each test sequence.
(4) Aircraft Loading. Aft center of gravity is usually most critical because visibility constraints limit the degree to which the pilot can see the landing surface during the flare. If a weight effect is shown, a minimum of two weights should be flown at each test altitude. One weight should be the maximum weight for prevailing conditions, and the other should provide a sufficient spread to validate weight accountability.
(5) All-engine-out landing.
Par 67 91
(i) Several procedures can be utilized to demonstrate compliance with the all-engine-out landing requirement. As discussed in the explanation portion of this paragraph, § 27.75(b) contains two separate requirements. One is the ability to transition safely into autorotation after failure of the last operative engine. The second aspect of this rule requires that a landing from autorotation be possible. The second requirement is discussed below. The maneuver is entered by smoothly reducing power at an optimum autorotation airspeed at a safe height above the landing surface. If a complete company test program has documented an all-engine-out landing to the GWI (gross weight/density ratio) limit, verification tests may be initiated at those limiting weight conditions. If not, buildup testing should be initiated at light weight. This test is ordinarily conducted at mid center of gravity. Typically, all altitudes may be approved with two weight limit landings-one at sea level and one near maximum takeoff and landing altitude.
(її) Demonstrated compliance with this requirement is intended to show that an autorotative descent rate can be arrested, and forward speed at touchdown can be controlled to a reasonable value (less than 40 KTAS is recommended) to ensure a reasonable chance of survivability for the all engine failure condition. On multiengine rotorcraft, rotor inertia is typically lower than for single-engine rotorcraft. RPM decays rapidly when the last engine is made inoperative. Due to this relatively low inertia level, considerable collective may be needed to prevent rotor overspeed conditions when the rotorcraft is flared for landing. Also, when testing the final maximum weight points, the pilot should anticipate a need for considerable collective pitch to control rotor overspeed during autorotative descent, particularly at high altitude WAT limiting conditions. Some designs incorporate features which may lead to rotorcraft damage in testing this requirement (e.g., droop stop breakage or loss of directional control with skids) if landings are conducted to a full stop with the engines cut off.
(ії) The intent of this rule is to demonstrate controlled touchdown conditions and freedom from loss of control or apparent hazard to occupants when landing with all engines failed. In these cases compliance can be demonstrated by leaving throttles in the idle position and ensuring no power is delivered to the drive train.
Also, computer analysis may be used in conjunction with simulated in-flight checks to give reasonable assurance that an actual safe touchdown can be accomplished.
Another method may be to make a power recovery after flare effectiveness of the rotorcraft has been determined. Other methods may be considered if they lead to reasonable assurance that descent can be arrested and forward speed controlled to allow safe landing with no injury to occupants when landing on a prepared surface with all engines failed. Regardless of the method(s) used to comply with this requirement, careful planning and analyses are very important due to the potentially hazardous aspects of power off simulation and landing of a multiengine rotorcraft totally without power. The all-engine-inoperative landing test is ordinarily done in conjunction with height velocity tests because ground and onboard instrumentation requirements are the same for both tests.
Par 67 92
7/30/97 АС 27-1A
(6) Prior to conducting these tests, the crew should be familiar with the engine inoperative landing characteristics of the rotorcraft. The flight profile may be entered in the same manner as a straight-in practice autorotation. It is recommended that for safety reasons idle power be used if a "needle split" (no engine power to the rotor) can be achieved. In some cases, a low engine idle adjustment has been set to assure needle split is attained. In other cases a temporary detent between idle and cutoff was used on the throttle. In a third case the engine was actually shut down on sample runs to verify that the engine power being delivered was not materially influencing landing capability or landing distances. The flare is maintained as long as is reasonable to dissipate speed and build RPM Rotor RPM must stay within allowable limits. Aft center of gravity is ordinarily critical due to visibility and flarability. Following the flare, the rotorcraft is allowed to touch down in a landing attitude. Rotor RPM at touchdown should be recorded, and it must be within allowable structural limits.
Par 67 93
7/30/97 AC 27-1A
68. RESERVED.
Intentionally Left Blank Par 68 94