AC 90-110C

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration Advisory Circular Subject: Service Provider Authorization Guidance for Public Performance Based Instrument Flight Procedures (IFPs) Date: 09/12/2023 Initiated By: AFS-400 AC No: 90-110C

1. PURPOSE OF THIS ADVISORY CIRCULAR (AC). This AC provides guidance for non- FAA Instrument Flight Procedure (IFP) developers, hereinafter referred to as “service providers,” to become authorized by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (Flight Standards’ Flight Technologies and Procedures Division) to develop public performance based IFPs.

2. APPLICABILITY. The primary audience for this AC is service providers who desire FAA authorization to develop public performance based IFPs. The secondary audience for this AC is FAA Flight Standards personnel who are directly associated with the procedure development process and/or charged with the responsibility to authorize and provide oversight of service providers.

This AC provides one method for service providers to obtain FAA authorization to develop public performance based IFPs. This AC describes an acceptable method, but not the only method, to obtain authorization; however, if you use the means described in this AC, you must follow it in its entirety. Service providers may elect to use guidance in this AC or an alternative method acceptable to the FAA.

The contents of this document do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. This document is intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.

3. WHERE YOU CAN FIND THIS AC. You can find this AC on the FAA’s website at https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/advisory_circulars and the Dynamic Regulatory System (DRS) at https://drs.faa.gov.

4. WHAT THIS CANCELS. AC 90-110B, Instrument Flight Procedure Service Provider Authorization Guidance for Space-based Instrument Flight Procedures, dated 03/20/2019, is canceled.

5. RELATED 14 CFR PARTS. This AC applies to the section of 14 CFR parts 71, 73, 77, 91, 93, 95, 97, 121, 135, and 157.

6. PRINCIPAL CHANGES. The title of the AC changed from “Instrument Flight Procedure Service Provider Authorization Guidance for Space-based Instrument Flight Procedures” to “Service Provider Authorization Guidance for Public Performance Based Instrument Flight Procedures (IFPs).” This AC includes reference to AC 120-92, Safety Management Systems for Aviation Service Providers. It updates IFP record retention requirements. It clarifies that service providers may develop approved departures. It also clarifies the process for submitting public IFPs to the FAA.

7. AC FEEDBACKFORM. For your convenience, the AC Feedback Form is the last page of this AC. Note any deficiencies found, clarifications needed, or suggested improvements regarding the content of this AC on the Feedback Form.

Wesley L. Mooty Acting Deputy Executive Director, Flight Standards Service

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURE SERVICE PROVIDER

REQUIREMENTS1-1

1.1 General1-1

1.2 Organization1-1

1.3 Required Functional Positions1-3

1.4 IFP Design and Development Process1-4

1.5 Procedure Maintenance1-4

1.6 Application1-4

1.7 FAA Authorization Process and Program1-5

1.8 Notification1-5

CHAPTER 2. PROCESS FOR IFP DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT2-1

2.1 General2-1

2.2 Preliminary Activities2-1

2.3 Procedure Design2-2

2.4 Instrument Flight Procedure Validation (IFPV)2-2

2.5 Pre-Implementation2-2

2.6 Post-Implementation2-2

APPENDIX A. TRAINING SYLLABUS EXAMPLEA-1

APPENDIX B. ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATIONB-1

1-1 CHAPTER 1. INSTRUMENT FLIGHT PROCEDURE

SERVICE PROVIDER REQUIREMENTS

1.1 General This chapter provides a list of requirements and identifies reference materials for service providers applying for FAA authorization to develop public instrument flight procedures (IFPs). This enables service providers to develop and maintain public performance-based instrument flight procedures, approved departures, and other future capabilities.

1.2 Organization The service provider must meet the following requirements:

1.2.1 Operations Manual The organization must have an FAA-accepted operations manual that contains:

1. Current regulatory guidance material associated with each authorized function,

2. A process to comply with environmental policy,

3. A list of functions, limitations, and product(s) authorized by the FAA (Flight Technologies and Procedures Division),

4. A Notices to Air Missions (NOTAM) plan,

5. A description of the service provider’s organizational structure and roles and responsibilities relevant to IFP design and maintenance,

6. Processes (for each of the following items),

• Communications and coordination with appropriate FAA offices

• Electronic aeronautical data transmission to include forms and documents

• IFP development and supporting software

• IFP maintenance

• Manual update

• Periodic internal audits

• Records management

• Performing any other functions the FAA authorizes

7. Training programs (initial and recurrent), and

8. A process for exchanging aeronautical data with FAA-approved data source(s).

1-2

1.2.2 Safety Management Process Service providers should define the safety policies, processes, and practices for all aspects of IFP design, validation, and maintenance. Service providers should have processes and methods in place to control safety risks before and after an IFP is approved. If service providers want to adopt an FAA-accepted Safety Management System (SMS), they should use AC 120-92, Safety Management Systems for Aviation Service Providers, as guidance.

1.2.3 Access to FAA IFP Publications and Correspondence Service providers must establish a process for maintaining access to FAA and service provider publications and correspondence pertinent to IFP development. Access includes links to current source documents on FAA websites. All procedure designers must have access.

1.2.4 Training The service provider must establish a training program with specified minimum qualification standards for personnel involved in IFP development. The training program must be documented in an FAA-accepted service provider manual. The manual must include:

1. Initial and recurrent training requirements and

2. A training syllabus as outlined in appendix A

1.2.5 Record Keeping Service providers must maintain the following records in an electronic records format accessible to the FAA:

1. A file containing all documents required by FAA Order 8260.19, Flight Procedures and Airspace; FAA Order 8260.46, Departure Procedure (DP) Program; and FAA 8260-series forms; waivers; and approval letters, and the service provider’s operations manual. The files must be retained for two years after an IFP is canceled and five years after a procedure is involved in an incident or accident.

2. Personnel training records

3. Any additional recordkeeping items listed in the service provider’s operations manual

1-3

1.3 Required Functional Positions

1.3.1 Chief Designer

1. The organization must appoint a Chief Designer, who is responsible for the service provider’s IFP development operations. The Chief Designer must certify in writing that each IFP meets FAA requirements.

2. The Chief Designer must have the following qualifications:

a. The qualification and experience requirements of a Qualified Designer (see paragraph 1.3.2),

b. Experience in the development of IFPs,

c. Knowledge of applicable design requirements in 8260-series FAA orders, and

d. Knowledge of the principles of Quality Assurance (QA).

3. The Chief Designer’s qualifications must be evaluated by the FAA. The FAA’s acceptance of the Chief Designer takes place during the operations manual review process (see paragraph 1.2.1).

1.3.2 Qualified Designer Qualified Designer qualifications and experience are:

1. Satisfactory completion of a formal course of training accepted by the FAA (Flight Technologies and Procedures Division’s representative),

2. Satisfactory completion of on-the-job training, consistent with the requirements outlined in the service provider’s operations manual (see paragraph 1.2.1),

3. Knowledge of applicable design regulations, and

4. Written approval by the Chief Designer.

1.3.3 Quality Assurance (QA) Specialist The service provider must appoint a QA Specialist responsible for performing QA activities. Qualifications and experience of a QA Specialist are:

1. Meet or have met the qualification for a Qualified Designer (see paragraph 1.3.2) and

2. Knowledge and experience in QA as outlined in the service provider’s operations manual (see paragraph 1.2.1).

1.3.4 Flight Validation The service provider is responsible for ensuring all IFPs are flight validated in accordance with AC 90-113, Instrument Flight Procedure Validation (IFPV) of Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) Instrument Flight Procedures (IFP); FAA Order 8900.1, Flight

1-4 Standards Information Management System (FSIMS), and FAA Order 8200.1, United States Standard Flight Inspection Manual (USSFIM). Regarding flight validation:

1. A service provider may appoint a person within the service provider’s organization to fulfill this function upon completion of a Flight Validation briefing approved by the FAA (Flight Technologies and Procedures Division), or

2. The service provider may enter into an agreement with an FAA-authorized flight validation provider, or

3. The service provider may enter into an agreement with the FAA for flight validation services.

1.4 IFP Design and Development Process

1.4.1 Guidance for IFP development and administration are found in:

• Aeronautical Radio Incorporated (ARINC) specification 424

• FAA Order JO 7400.2, Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters

• FAA Order 7930.2, Notices to Air Missions

• FAA Order 8260.3, United States Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedures

• FAA Order 8260.19, Flight Procedures and Airspace

• FAA Order 8260.26, Establishing Submission Cutoff Dates for Civil Instrument Flight Procedures

• FAA Order 8260.46, Departure Procedure Program

• FAA Order 8260.58, United States Standard for Performance Based Navigation Instrument Procedure Design

1.4.2 Additional elements of the development process are found in:

• FAA Order 1050.1, Environmental Impacts: Policies and Procedures

• FAA Order 8260.43, Flight Procedures Management Program

1.5 Procedure Maintenance IFPs must be maintained in accordance with all applicable FAA orders (see paragraph B.3.2) and the service provider’s operations manual (see paragraph 1.2.1).

1.6 Application To apply, the service provider must submit a letter of application to the FAA (Flight Technologies and Procedures Division), including a detailed proposal of compliance with this AC to the address listed below. The FAA will review the letter of application and guide how to proceed with the authorization process. Please email this letter of application to 9- awa-avs-afs420@faa.gov.

1-5

1.7 FAA Authorization Process and Program The FAA (Flight Technologies and Procedures Division) will:

1.7.1 Applicant’s compliance Verify the applicant’s compliance with this AC, which includes, but is not limited to:

1. Audit(s) of the applicant’s facilities (including any subcontractor facilities),

2. Interview(s) of applicant’s staff,

3. Examination of relevant documentation,

4. Evaluation of the development process, and

5. Evaluation of compliance with applicable orders.

1.7.2 IFP Quality Review Perform an IFP Quality Review. See table 1-1 for a sample quality review checklist used for airports with approaches for fixed-wing aircraft (if applicable).

1.7.3 Oversight Process Perform oversight and compliance as outlined in FAA Order 8000.368, Flight Standards Service Oversight; and FAA Order FS 8260.57, Oversight of Non-FAA Instrument Flight Procedure Service Providers.

1.7.4 Letter of Authorization (LOA) Upon determination of compliance with this AC, issue an LOA to develop public performance based IFPs.

1.8 Notification The service provider will provide the Flight Technologies and Procedures Division a 14-day advance notice (in writing) for any proposed change, which may affect compliance with this AC.

1-6 Table 1-1. IFP Quality Review Sample Checklist (airports with approaches for fixed-wing aircraft (if applicable)

Airport:

Designer:

Reviewer:

Date:

IFP Name:

Requirement Phase and Data Collection: Yes No NA Existing IFPs and obstacles reviewed Airport name Airport’s geographic location Runway characteristics (TDZE, THLD, profile) Runway Threshold Latitude/Longitude Departure End Threshold Latitude/Longitude Touchdown Zone Elevations - All runways Landing Threshold Elevations - All runways Navigational aids Airport lighting Weather reporting and forecasting capabilities Airspace limitations and restrictions ATC contacted – Approach ATC contacted – Center Categorical Exclusion Letter included Mountainous terrain Assumed tree/vegetation heights per the ground obstacle assessment Obstacle data Five-year average LOW temperature analysis Design Phase Yes No NA Bearings, headings, courses, and radials are magnetic and documented to the closest hundredth of a degree

Elevations and altitudes are in feet Distances are in nautical mile (NM) Waypoints are named and have completed FAA Form 8260-2 Minimum Altitudes are at or rounded up to the nearest 100-foot increment (i.e., 1,701 feet and 1,751 feet both round up to 1,800 feet)

1-7 Airport:

Designer:

Reviewer:

Date:

IFP Name:

Requirement Phase and Data Collection: Yes No NA The missed approach design must match the missed approach instructions

Feeder, Initial, and Intermediate Segments documented Holding Patterns evaluated and documented All bank angles evaluated Form 8260-3 per FAA Order 8260.19 Form 8260-9 per the FAA Order 8260.19 Form 8260-2 for all waypoints and NAVAIDs per FAA Order 8260.19 to include turn centers

ARINC 424 coding

2-1 CHAPTER 2. PROCESS FOR IFP DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT

2.1 General This chapter provides guidance on the coordination process to design/develop public performance based IFPs.

Figure 2.1. Process Flow Chart

2.2 Preliminary Activities Before design of a public performance based IFP, several tasks must be completed which include, but are not limited to:

2.2.1 Initial Coordination The first step is for service providers to obtain concurrence from the airport sponsor/owner and the applicable air traffic facilities. Procedure development at National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems (NPIAS) airports should be coordinated early with the Office of Airports, in the event the Airport Layout Plan needs to be updated.

Note: Procedure development requires the airport to comply with applicable notification requirements (see 14 CFR part 157).

2.2.2 Validation Team Coordination Procedure initiation coordination requirements are found in FAA Orders 8260.19 and 8260.43.

2-2

2.2.3 Kickoff Meeting For all public projects, the service provider should host a kickoff meeting. A kickoff meeting provides a forum to reach a consensus on the initial procedure design and establish a timeline. Recommended participants: representatives from air traffic, environmental, airspace, flight procedures team, and the Flight Procedures and Airspace Group (aviation safety inspector, procedure design specialist, and a representative from the oversight unit).

2.3 Procedure Design After the initial coordination, the service provider will design and document the IFP. As a part of this process, the service provider must ensure the procedure has the appropriate environmental documentation.

2.4 Instrument Flight Procedure Validation (IFPV) The service provider must conduct IFPV in accordance with AC 90-113; FAA Order 8900.1, Volume 11 Chapter 12; and FAA Order 8200.1.

2.5 Pre-Implementation The service provider must submit the completed IFP to the FAA for review and processing via the Specials and Waivers Inventory Management System (SWIMS), in accordance with FAA Order 8260.43.

2.6 Post-Implementation The service provider must ensure lifecycle procedure maintenance per current reference materials (see paragraph B.3.2).