The concern sheetOCR
This is OCR from the scanned FAA concern sheet. OCR can misread letters and numbers.
EDERAL AVIATIO Airworthiness Concern Sheet Date: February 23, 2011 Full Name: Jason Brys Title: Flight Test Engineer Organization: Wichita Aireraft Certification Office Department: Flight Test and Program Mgit. Branch Address: 1801 S. Airport Road, Room 100 City. State, Zipcode: Wichita, KS 67209 Telephone Number: 316-946-4100 E-mail: Jason.Brys@ faa.gov Make, Model, Series, Serial No.: Hawker Beecheraft Model B300 and B300C modified per Hawker Beccheraft Drawing 130M000030 or Kit Drawing 130- 4014 (equipped with Heavy Weight and Extended Fuel Capabilities) Reason for Airworthiness Concern: The take-off speeds and field lengths charts published are incorrect in Airplane Flight Manual (P/N 130-590031-245).
continue to second page.) FAA Description of Airworthiness Concern (Who, What. Where, When, How? Attachments: RA and appropriate data. Description mas Hawker Beecheraft has uncovered an error in the take-off speeds and field lengths published in the FAA Approved Flight Manual (P/N 130-590031-245), applicable to Models B300 and B300C modified per Hawker Beecheraft Drawing 130M000030 or Kit Drawing 130-4014. The required runway distances published in the current manual can be up to 320 feet shorter than what would be required. The performance data contained in the pilot's checklist (P/N 130-590031-273) has been determined to be correct.
The FAA is considering requiring an update to the performance charts in the flight manual (P/N 130-590031- 245) to correet the performance charts.
Request for Information (Proposed Alternate Inspection/Repair Procedures, Cost Impact. Etc. Note: Any comments or replies to the FAA need to be as specific as possible. Please provide specific examples to illustrate your comments/concerns.):
We are soliciting additional information and comments on the proposed action from the associations and operators of the affected airplanes. Please make comments and information as specific as possible. Please provide specific examples to illustrate comments/concerns.
Attachments: "SDR(s) L *A/ID *SLS | *FAASR/*NTSBSR | *AD *AMOC _ *RA L Notification: FAA *AOPA X *EAA L I Type Club *TC Holder Other:
Response Requested on _: Emergency (10 days) 2 Alert (30 days) | Information (90 days) (to select a check box, double click on check box and select "Checked" in the Default value) * Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs); Accident/Incident Data System (A/IDS); Service Letter (SL); Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin (SAIB); Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)/National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Safety Recommendation (FAASR/NTSBSR): Airworthiness Experimental Aireraft Association (EAA): Type Certificate (TC) Directive (AD): Alternate Method of Compliance (AMOC); Risk Assessment (RA); Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association (AOPA);
puner operators through associations and type clubs. Ar this time, the FAA has not made a determination on what type of corrective action ofanyt needed at this time. The FAN a final determination will depend in part on the information n should be taken, The resolution of this airworthiness concern could involve an AD action His Airworthiness Concern Sheet tACST is intended as a means for FAA Aviation Safety Engineers to coordinate airworthiness e ran SAIB, or the FAA could determine that no action as eceived in response to this ACS. verns with airerati The 1 AA endorses dissemination of this technical information to all manufacturers and req ests association and type clubs comments
Record of Ex Parte Contacts Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? (You might need to submit a separate record to the Rules Docket. The AD Manual defines "Ex Parte Contacts.") AOPA ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED Rob Hackman. 2/28/2011 DATE None RESPONSE Other/Additional Information: