AD 2000-02-04

Historical

Airworthiness directive · Autopilot Disconnect, Out-Of-Trim Condition · Airbus Industrie A300 Model B2-1A, A300 Model B2-1C, A300 Model B2-203 and 22 more

Effective
February 9, 2000
Published
January 25, 2000 · 65 FR 3799–3801
Issued
January 18, 2000
Superseded by
AD2000-23-07
Models
A300 Model B2-1A, A300 Model B2-1C, A300 Model B2-203, A300 Model B2K-3C, A300 Model B4-103, A300 Model B4-203 and 19 more
Data sheet
TCDSA35EU
Registered aircraft
122 matched by model
Product
Aircraft · Large airplane
Amendment
39-11522
Docket
2000-NM-09-AD
Issued as
Final rule; request for comments

Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 00-1595. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed August 7, 2025.

On this page

Summary

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Model A300 and all Model A300-600 and A310 series airplanes. This action requires performing a pitch trim system test to detect any continuity defect in the autotrim function, and follow-on corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent a sudden change in pitch due to an out-of-trim condition combined with an autopilot disconnect, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane.

The airworthiness directive

2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:

2000-02-04 Airbus Industrie: Amendment 39-11522. Docket 2000-NM-09-AD.

PDF page 3

Applicability: Airbus Model A300 series airplanes, having manufacturer's serial number 159, 168, 188, 202, 205, 213, 299, or 302; and all Model A300-600 and A310 series airplanes; certificated in any category.

Note 1:

This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent a sudden change in pitch due to an out-of-trim condition combined with an autopilot disconnect, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane, accomplish the following:

(a) Pitch Trim System Test

PDF page 3

(a) Within 20 days after the effective date of this AD: Perform a pitch trim system test to detect any continuity defect in the autotrim function, in accordance with All Operators Telex (AOT) A300-22A0115 (for Model A300 series airplanes), A300-600-22A6042 (for Model A300-600 series airplanes), or A310-22A2053 (for Model A310 series airplanes), all dated December 23, 1999, as applicable.

(1) If no continuity defect is found, no further action is required by this paragraph.

Corrective Actions

PDF page 3

(2) If any continuity defect is found, prior to further flight, accomplish the actions required by paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (a)(2)(ii) of this AD, in accordance with the applicable AOT.

(i) Repair any discrepant wiring found in the pitch trim system.

(ii) Repeat the initial pitch trim system test required by paragraph (a) of this AD.

Note 2:

All Operators Telexes (AOT) A300-22A0115, A300-600-22A6042, and A310-22A2053, all dated December 23, 1999, reference Aircraft Schematic Manual (ASM) 22-27-00 as an additional source of service information to accomplish the repair.

(b) Reporting Requirement

PDF page 3

(b) Within 10 days after accomplishing the pitch trim system test required by this AD, or within 10 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later: Submit a report of the inspection results (both positive and negative findings) to Airbus Customer Services, Engineering and Technical Support, Attention Mr. Vincent Frayssinet, AI/SE-E43; phone number 33 (0)5.62.11.04.96; Sita Code TLSBQ7X.

(c) Alternative Methods of Compliance

PDF page 3

(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.

Note 3:

Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.

(d) Special Flight Permits

PDF page 3

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

(e) Incorporation by Reference

PDF page 3

(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with Airbus All Operators Telex A300-22A0115, dated December 23, 1999; Airbus All Operators Telex A300-600-22A6042, dated December 23, 1999; or Airbus All Operators Telex A310-22A2053, dated December 23, 1999; as applicable. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

Note 4:

The subject of this AD is addressed in French airworthiness directive T2000-007-301(B), dated January 4, 2000.

(f) This amendment becomes effective on February 9, 2000.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

DatesPage 1

Effective February 9, 2000.

The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of February 9, 2000.

Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or before February 24, 2000.

AddressesPage 1

Submit comments in triplicate to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, ANM-114, Attention: Rules Docket No. 2000-NM-09-AD, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056.

The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

For further information contactPage 1

Norman B. Martenson, Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.

Supplementary informationPage 2

The Direction Ge ne rale de l'Aviation Civile (DGAC), which is the airworthiness authority for France, recently notified the FAA that an unsafe condition may exist on certain Airbus Model A300 and all Model A300-600 and A310 series airplanes. The DGAC advises that an Airbus Model A300-600 series airplane flew with autopilot 1 (AP 1), pitch trim 1 (PT 1), and pitch trim 2 (PT 2) engaged. When the flight crew engaged the vertical speed mode and selected a new vertical speed in order to change the flight level, the vertical speed of the airplane changed but did not remain at the speed that had been selected by the flight crew.

After landing, the maintenance team performed a test with the autopilot engaged in vertical speed mode. When the team selected a vertical speed, the flight director pitch bars and control columns moved, but the pitch trim wheels did not move. An open circuit was found in the connection between flight control computer 1 (FCC 1) and flight augmentation computer 1 (FAC 1). That connection is necessary to generate the autotrim function.

With the autopilot engaged in command (CMD), the FCC command (COM) and monitor (MON) lanes send signals to the FAC in order to ensure the autotrim function. When the FAC does not receive the FCC COM signal or the FCC MON signal, the autotrim function is inhibited, which results in an out-of-trim condition. If an autopilot disconnect occurs when the airplane is in an out-of-trim condition, this condition, if not corrected, could result in a sudden change in pitch and consequent reduced controllability of the airplane.

Explanation of Relevant Service InformationPage 2

Airbus has issued All Operators Telexes (AOT) A300-22A0115 (for Model A300 series airplanes), A300-600-22A6042 (for Model A300-600 series airplanes), and A310-22A2053 (for Model A310 series airplanes), all dated December 23, 1999, which describe procedures for a pitch trim system test to detect any continuity defect, and follow-on corrective actions, if necessary. Corrective actions include repairing any discrepant wiring found in the pitch trim system. (The AOT's reference Aircraft Schematic Manual 22-27-00 as an additional source of service information for accomplishment of the repair.) The DGAC has classified these AOT's as mandatory and issued French airworthiness directive T2000-007-301(B), dated January 4, 2000, in order to assure the continued airworthiness of these airplanes in France.

FAA's ConclusionsPage 2

These airplane models are manufactured in France and are type certificated for operation in the United States under the provisions of section 21.29 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.29) and the applicable bilateral airworthiness agreement. Pursuant to this bilateral airworthiness agreement, the DGAC has kept the FAA informed of the situation described above. The FAA has examined the findings of the DGAC, reviewed all available information, and determined that AD action is necessary for products of this type design that are certificated for operation in the United States.

Explanation of Requirements of RulePage 2

Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to exist or develop on other airplanes of the same type design registered in the United States, this AD is being issued to prevent a sudden change in pitch due to an out-of-trim condition combined with an autopilot disconnect, which could result in reduced controllability of the airplane. This AD requires performing a pitch trim system test to detect any continuity defect in the autotrim function, and follow-on corrective actions, if necessary. The actions are required to be accomplished in accordance with the AOT's described previously.

Interim actionPage 2

This is considered to be interim action. The manufacturer has advised that it currently is developing additional actions that will positively address the unsafe condition addressed by this AD. Once these actions are developed, approved, and available, the FAA may consider additional rulemaking.

Determination of Rule's Effective DatePage 2

Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Comments invitedPage 2

Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments are invited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire.

Communications shall identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption ADDRESSES. All communications received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be needed.

Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report that summarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.

Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: “Comments to Docket Number 2000-NM-09-AD.” The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter.

Regulatory impactPage 2

The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.

The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe condition in aircraft, and that it is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.

Adoption of the AmendmentPage 3

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

Affected TCDS · 1

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 122

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Airbus Industrie74 aircraft
  • Airbus48 aircraft
By year built
19832007
Registered aircraft by year built: 120 aircraft
19832
19841
19851
19881
19892
19905
19913
19927
19935
19945
19958
19965
19975
19986
19996
20007
200111
20026
20038
20047
20057
20066
20076

2 with no year recorded

By model

Aircraft

See all 122 aircraft