AD 2000-08-07

Airworthiness directive · Tooling Holes · Textron BAe.125 Series 800A, BAe.125 Series 800B, Hawker 800 and 1 more

Effective
May 31, 2000
Published
April 26, 2000 · 65 FR 24381–24383
Issued
April 14, 2000
Supersedes
AD96-24-16
Models
BAe.125 Series 800A, BAe.125 Series 800B, Hawker 800, Hawker 800XP
Data sheet
TCDSA3EU
Registered aircraft
369 matched by model
Product
Aircraft · Large airplane
Amendment
39-11693
Docket
99-NM-13-AD
Issued as
Final rule

Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 00-9896. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed January 21, 2026.

On this page

Summary

This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Raytheon Model BAe 125-800A and BAe 125-800B, Model Hawker 800, and Model Hawker 800XP series airplanes, that currently requires the filling of two tooling holes on the firewalls of the left and right engine pylons with firewall sealant. This amendment requires the sealing of all unused (open) tooling holes on the firewalls of the left and right engine pylons, and expands the applicability to include additional airplanes. This amendment is prompted by reports of additional unused (open) tooling holes, found at locations other than those currently addressed. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent an engine fire from moving to the fuselage and to the lines that carry flammable fluid that are located inboard of the firewall.

The airworthiness directive

2000-08-07 Raytheon Aircraft Co. (Formerly Beech): Amendment 39-11693. Docket 99-NM-13-AD. Supersedes AD 96-24-16, Amendment 39-9840.

Applicability: Model BAe 125-800A and BAe 125-800B, Model Hawker 800, and Model Hawker 800XP series airplanes; as listed in Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.54-1-3815B, Revision 1, dated May 1998; certificated in any category.

Note 1:

This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent an engine fire from moving to the fuselage and to the lines that carry flammable fluid that are located inboard of the firewall, accomplish the following:

(a) Restatement of Requirements of AD 96-24-16

PDF page 2

(a) For airplanes identified in AD 96-24-16, amendment 39-9840: Within 6 months after January 27, 1997 (the effective date of AD 96-24-16), fill the two, unused tooling holes in the firewalls of the left and right engine pylons, in accordance with Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.54-1-3815B, dated March 26, 1996, or Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.54-1-3815B, Revision 1, dated May 1998. After the effective date of this AD, only Revision 1 of this service bulletin shall be used.

(b) New Requirements of This AD

PDF page 2

(b) For all airplanes: Within 6 months after the effective date of this AD, fill all unused tooling holes in the left and right engine pylon firewalls with firewall sealant, in accordance with Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.54-1-3815B, Revision 1, dated May 1998.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ACE-116W, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Wichita ACO.

Note 2:

Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Wichita ACO.

Special Flight Permits

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

Incorporation by Reference

(e) The actions shall be done in accordance with Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.54-1-3815B, dated March 26, 1996; or Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.54-1-3815B, Revision 1, dated May 1998.

(1) The incorporation by reference of Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.54-1-3815B, Revision 1, dated May 1998, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

(2) The incorporation by reference of Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.54-1-3815B, dated March 26, 1996, was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of January 27, 1997 (61 FR 66878, December 19, 1996).

(3) Copies may be obtained from Raytheon Aircraft Company, Manager Service Engineering, Hawker Customer Support Department, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas, 67201-0085. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

(f) This amendment becomes effective on May 31, 2000.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

DatesPage 1

Effective May 31, 2000.

The incorporation by reference of Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.54-1-3815B, Revision 1, dated May 1998, as listed in the regulations, is approved by the Director of the Federal Register of May 31, 2000.

The incorporation by reference of Raytheon Service Bulletin SB.54-1-3815B, dated March 26, 1996, as listed in the regulations, was approved previously by the Director of the Federal Register as of January 27, 1997 (61 FR 66878, December 19, 1996).

AddressesPage 1

The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Raytheon Aircraft Company, Manager Service Engineering, Hawker Customer Support Department, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas, 67201-0085. This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

For further information contactPage 2

Jeffrey A. Pretz, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Propulsion Branch, ACE-116W, FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 946-4153; fax (316) 946-4407.

Supplementary informationPage 2

A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by superseding AD 96-24-16, amendment 39-9840 (61 FR 66878, December 19, 1996), which is applicable to certain Raytheon Model BAe 125-800A and BAe 125-800B, Model Hawker 800, and Model Hawker 800XP series airplanes, was published in the Federal Register on January 24, 2000 (65 FR 3619). The action proposed to continue to require the filling of two tooling holes on the firewalls of the left and right engine pylons with firewall sealant. The action also proposed to require the sealing of all unused (open) tooling holes on the firewalls of the left and right engine pylons, and would expand the applicability to include additional airplanes.

CommentsPage 2

Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.

ConclusionPage 2

The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.

Cost impactPage 2

There are approximately 340 Model BAe 125-800A and BAe 125-800B, Model Hawker 800, and Model Hawker 800XP series airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 221 airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD.

The actions that are currently required by AD 96-24-16, and retained in this AD, take approximately 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the currently required actions on U.S. operators is estimated to be $120 per airplane.

The new actions that are required in this AD action will take approximately 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the requirements of this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $26,520, or $120 per airplane.

The cost impact figures discussed above are based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.

Regulatory impactPage 2

The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.

Adoption of the amendmentPage 2

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-9840 (61 FR 66878, December 19, 1996), and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD), amendment 39-11693, to read as follows:

Affected TCDS · 1

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 369

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Raytheon253 aircraft
  • British Aerospace66 aircraft
  • Raytheon Corporate Jets40 aircraft
  • Corporate Jets8 aircraft
  • Hawker Beechcraft2 aircraft
By year built
19842007
Registered aircraft by year built: 317 aircraft
19846
19855
19862
19874
19885
19897
19906
19911
19927
19939
19946
19956
199615
199713
199821
199925
200028
200134
200235
200323
200431
200521
20065
20072

52 with no year recorded

By model

Aircraft

See all 369 aircraft