- Effective
- July 20, 2000
- Published
- June 15, 2000 · 65 FR 37476–37478
- Issued
- June 7, 2000
- Superseded by
- AD2004-13-25
- Models
- A330-202, A330-223, A330-301, A330-321, A330-322, A330-323 and 6 more
- Registered aircraft
- 40 matched by model
- Product
- Aircraft · Large airplane
- Amendment
- 39-11784
- Docket
- 2000-NM-64-AD
- Issued as
- Final rule
Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 00-14882. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed August 7, 2025.
Copies of the files this page was built from, with their SHA-256. Retrieved October 18, 2026.
| File | Size | SHA-256 | Original |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official PDF | 224 KB | 3e6462ce…e5c11eb | 00-14882.pdf on govinfo.gov |
| Federal Register XML | 15 KB | 94d1e372…5521e0a | 00-14882.xml on federalregister.gov |
| FAA DRS HTML | 47 KB | 2417412f…b18db9a | FAA DRS (API key needed) |
On this page
Summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Airbus Model A330 and A340 series airplanes, that requires repetitive inspections to check the play of the eye-end of the piston rod of the elevator servo-controls, and follow-on corrective actions, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to detect and correct excessive play of the eye-end of the piston rod of the elevator servo-controls, which could result in failure of the elevator servo-control.
Rule preamble
The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.
DatesPage 1
Effective July 20, 2000.
The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of July 20, 2000.
AddressesPage 1
The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Airbus Industrie, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France. This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.
For further information contactPage 1
Norman B. Martenson, Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.
Supplementary informationPage 1
A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Airbus Model A330 and A340 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19348). That action proposed to require repetitive inspections to check the play of the eye-end of the piston rod of the elevator servo-controls, and follow-on corrective actions, if necessary.
CommentsPage 1
Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
ConclusionPage 1
The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.
Cost impactPage 1
None of the airplanes affected by this action are on the U.S. Register. All airplanes included in the applicability of this rule currently are operated by non-U.S. operators under foreign registry; therefore, they are not directly affected by this AD. However, the FAA considers that this rule is necessary to ensure that the unsafe condition is addressed in the event that any of these subject airplanes are imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the future.
Should an affected airplane be imported and placed on the U.S. Register in the future, it would require approximately 2 work hours to accomplish the required actions, at an average labor rate of $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of this AD would be $120 per airplane, per inspection cycle.
Regulatory impactPage 1
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
Adoption of the amendmentPage 1
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Affected TCDS · 2
The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.
Registered aircraft · 40
Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.
| 2000 | 1 |
|---|---|
| 2003 | 5 |
| 2004 | 10 |
| 2005 | 3 |
| 2006 | 6 |
| 2007 | 7 |
8 with no year recorded