AD 2000-12-15

Historical

Airworthiness directive · Overwing Emergency Exit · Dassault-Aviation Falcon 10, FALCON 2000, Falcon 900EX and 12 more

Effective
July 20, 2000
Published
June 15, 2000 · 65 FR 37480–37481
Issued
June 9, 2000
Superseded by
AD2008-04-14
Models
Falcon 10, FALCON 2000, Falcon 900EX, Fan Jet Falcon Series C, Fan Jet Falcon Series D, Fan Jet Falcon Series E and 9 more
Registered aircraft
712 matched by model
Product
Aircraft · Large airplane
Amendment
39-11793
Docket
2000-NM-56-AD
Issued as
Final rule

Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 00-15188. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed August 7, 2025.

On this page

Summary

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to all Dassault Model Falcon 2000, Mystere-Falcon 900, Falcon 900EX, Fan Jet Falcon, Mystere-Falcon 50, Mystere-Falcon 20, Mystere-Falcon 200, and Falcon 10 series airplanes, that requires repetitive tests and inspections to detect discrepancies of the overwing emergency exit; and corrective action, if necessary. This amendment is prompted by issuance of mandatory continuing airworthiness information by a foreign civil airworthiness authority. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent failure of the overwing emergency exits to open, and consequent injury to passengers or crew members during an emergency evacuation.

The airworthiness directive

2000-12-15 Dassault Aviation: Amendment 39-11793. Docket 2000-NM-56-AD.

Applicability: All Model Falcon 2000, Mystere-Falcon 900, Falcon 900EX, Fan Jet Falcon, Mystere-Falcon 50, Mystere-Falcon 20, Mystere-Falcon 200, and Falcon 10 series airplanes; certificated in any category.

Note 1:

This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (b) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent failure of the overwing emergency exits to open, and consequent injury to passengers or crew members during an emergency evacuation, accomplish the following:

(a) Operational Test and Inspection

PDF page 2

(a) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, perform an operational test and detailed visual inspection of the overwing emergency exit from inside the cabin to detect discrepancies (including separation, tearing, wearing, arcing, cracking) in the areas and components listed in Chapter 5 (ATA Code 52) of the applicable airplane maintenance manual (AMM). Accomplish the actions in accordance with the applicable AMM. If any discrepancy is detected during any test or inspection required by this paragraph, prior to further flight, repair in accordance with Chapter 5 (ATA Code 52) of the applicable AMM. Repeat the operational test and inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 13 months.

Note 2:

For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual inspection is defined as: “An intensive visual examination of a specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate access procedures may be required.”

(b) Alternative Methods of Compliance

PDF page 2

(b) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, International Branch, ANM-116.

Note 3:

Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the International Branch, ANM-116.

(c) Special Flight Permits

PDF page 2

(c) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

Note 4:

The subject of this AD is addressed in French airworthiness directives 1999-213-025(B), 1999-212-024(B), 1999-211-023(B), and 1999-210-009(B); all dated May 19, 1999.

(d) This amendment becomes effective on July 20, 2000.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

Effective datePage 1

July 20, 2000.

AddressesPage 1

Information pertaining to this amendment may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington.

For further information contactPage 1

Norman B. Martenson, Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2110; fax (425) 227-1149.

Supplementary informationPage 1

A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to all Dassault Model Falcon 2000, Mystere-Falcon 900, Falcon 900EX, Fan Jet Falcon, Mystere-Falcon 50, Mystere-Falcon 20, Mystere-Falcon 200, and Falcon 10 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on April 24, 2000 (65 FR 21679). That action proposed to require repetitive tests and inspections to detect discrepancies of the overwing emergency exit; and corrective action, if necessary.

CommentsPage 1

Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.

ConclusionPage 1

The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.

Cost impactPage 1

The FAA estimates that 767 airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $46,020, or $60 per airplane, per inspection cycle.

The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted.

Regulatory impactPage 1

The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.

Adoption of the amendmentPage 2

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:

Affected TCDS · 4

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 712

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Dassault550 aircraft
  • Dassault-Breguet152 aircraft
  • Avions Marcel Dassault5 aircraft
  • Avions Marcel Dassault Breguet3 aircraft
  • Avion Marcel Dassault Breguet2 aircraft
By year built
19672024
Registered aircraft by year built: 649 aircraft
19672
19681
19691
19721
19748
19753
19764
19774
19782
19796
198010
19817
19826
19844
19852
19864
198723
198821
19895
19905
199112
199211
19938
19947
199518
199628
199728
199832
199951
200043
200148
200249
200313
200422
200518
200620
200721
200819
200913
20108
20115
20124
20137
20149
201510
20166
20173
20185
20194
20202
20211
20222
20232
20241

63 with no year recorded

By model

See all 17 models

Aircraft

See all 712 aircraft