- Effective
- February 16, 2001
- Published
- January 8, 2001 · 66 FR 1253–1255
- Issued
- December 22, 2000
- Superseded by
- AD2003-01-01
- Models
- 58 Model or Series (all), A36, B36TC
- Data sheet
- TCDS3A15
- Registered aircraft
- 2,663 matched by model
- Product
- Aircraft · Small airplane
- Amendment
- 39-12066
- Docket
- 99-CE-79-AD
- Issued as
- Final rule
Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 01-183. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed August 7, 2025.
Copies of the files this page was built from, with their SHA-256. Retrieved October 18, 2026.
| File | Size | SHA-256 | Original |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official PDF | 224 KB | bb9dfe9b…67f5ab4 | 01-183.pdf on govinfo.gov |
| Federal Register XML | 19 KB | 4c26d7fa…32ab4eb | 01-183.xml on federalregister.gov |
| FAA DRS HTML | 53 KB | 5044cd14…f91395e | FAA DRS (API key needed) |
On this page
Summary
This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) that applies to certain Raytheon Aircraft Company (Raytheon) Beech Models A36, B36TC, and 58 airplanes. This AD requires you to inspect for missing rivets on the right hand side of the fuselage and, if necessary, install rivets. Raytheon has identified several instances of missing rivets on these airplanes. The actions specified by this AD are intended to install missing rivets in the right hand fuselage panel assembly in the area above the right wing and below the cabin door threshold. These rivets must be present for the fuselage to carry the ultimate load and prevent critical structural failure with loss of airplane control.
The airworthiness directive
2000-26-16 Raytheon Aircraft Company: Amendment 39-12066; Docket No. 99-CE-79-AD.
(a)
PDF page 2(a) What airplanes are affected by this AD? This AD affects the following airplanes, certificated in any category:
| Model | Serial No. |
|---|---|
| Model A36 | E-1 through E-3231, and E-3233. |
| Model B36TC | EA-1 through EA-635. |
| Model 58 | TH-1 through TH-1811, and TH-1813 through TH-1897. |
(b) Who must comply with this AD? Anyone who wishes to operate any of the above airplanes must comply with this AD.
(c) What problem does this AD address? The actions specified by this AD are intended to install missing rivets in the right hand fuselage panel assembly in the area above the right wing and below the cabin door threshold. These rivets must be present for the fuselage to carry the ultimate load and prevent critical structural failure with loss of control of the airplane.
(d) What actions must I accomplish to address this problem? To address this problem, you must do the following actions:
| Actions | Compliance times | Procedures |
|---|---|---|
| (1) Inspect for up to 9 missing rivets between fuselage station (F.S.) 83.00 and F.S. 91.00 at water line (W.L.) 90.3 | Inspect within the next 100 hours time-in-service after February 16, 2001 (the effective date of this AD) | Do this inspection in accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS paragraph of Raytheon Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 53-3341, Revision 1, Revised: May 2000, and the Bonanza Series Maintenance Manual or Baron Model 58 Series Maintenance Manual. |
| (2) If you find rivets are missing, install these rivets | Before further flight after the inspection | Do these actions in accordance with the ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS paragraph of Raytheon Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 53-3341, Revision 1, Revised: May 2000, and the Bonanza Series Maintenance Manual or Baron Model 58 Series Maintenance Manual. |
(e) Can I comply with this AD in any other way? You may use an alternative method of compliance or adjust the compliance time if:
(1) Your alternative method of compliance provides an equivalent level of safety; and
(2) The Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), approves your alternative. Submit your request through an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Wichita ACO.
Note:
This AD applies to each airplane identified in paragraph (a) of this AD, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if you have not eliminated the unsafe condition, specific actions you propose to address it.
(f) Where can I get information about any already-approved alternative methods of compliance? Contact T.N. Baktha, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946-4155; facsimile: (316) 946-4407.
(g) What if I need to fly the airplane to another location to comply with this AD? The FAA can issue a special flight permit under sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate your airplane to a location where you can accomplish the requirements of this AD.
(h) Are any service bulletins incorporated into this AD by reference? Actions required by this AD must be done in accordance with Raytheon Mandatory Service Bulletin SB 53-3341, Revision 1, revised May 2000. The Director of the Federal Register approved this incorporation by reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You can get copies from Raytheon Aircraft Company, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085; telephone: (800) 429-5372 or (316) 676-3140. You can look at copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri, or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
(i) When does this amendment become effective? This amendment becomes effective on February 16, 2001.
Rule preamble
The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.
DatesPage 1
This AD becomes effective on February 16, 2001.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations as of February 16, 2001.
AddressesPage 1
You may get the service information referenced in this AD from Raytheon Aircraft Company, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085; telephone: (800) 429-5372 or (316) 676-3140. You may examine this information at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, Attention: Rules Docket No. 99-CE-79-AD, 901 Locust, Room 506, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW, suite 700, Washington, DC.
For further information contactPage 1
T.N. Baktha, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone: (316) 946-4155; facsimile: (316) 946-4407.
DiscussionPage 1
What Events Have Caused This AD?
Raytheon has identified several instances of missing rivets on these airplanes:
| Model | Serial No. |
|---|---|
| Model A36 Bonanza | serials E-1 through E-3231; and E-3233. |
| Model B36TC Bonanza | serials EA-1 through EA-635. |
| Model 58 Baron | serials TH-1 through TH-1811; and TH-1813 through TH-1897. |
Raytheon production and inspection personnel identified the missing rivets. The missing rivets are the result of a quality control problem.
What Are the Consequences if the Condition Is Not Corrected?
This condition results in the airplane being unable to carry the ultimate load with possible structural failure and loss of airplane control.
Has FAA Taken Any Action to This Point?
We issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to certain Raytheon Beech Models A36, B36TC, and 58 airplanes. This proposal was published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on September 26, 2000 (65 FR 57751). The NPRM proposed to require you to inspect for missing rivets on the right hand fuselage and if necessary, install rivets.
Was the Public Invited To Comment?
Interested persons were afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. No comments were received on the proposed rule or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.
The FAA's DeterminationPage 1
What Is FAA's Final Determination on This Issue?
After careful review of all available information related to the subject presented above, we have determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed except for minor editorial corrections. We determined that these minor corrections:
—Will not change the meaning of the AD; and
—Will not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed.
Cost impactPage 1
How Many Airplanes Does This AD impact?
We estimate that this AD affects 3632 airplanes in the U.S. registry.
What Is the Cost Impact of This AD on Owners/Operators of the Affected Airplanes?
We estimate the following costs to accomplish the inspection:
| Labor cost | Parts cost | Total cost per airplane | Total cost on U.S. operators |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 workhour × $60 per hour = $60 | No parts required for the inspection | $60 per airplane | $60 × = $217,920. |
We estimate the following costs to accomplish the modification if necessary:
| Laobor cost | Parts cost | Total cost per airplane |
|---|---|---|
| 4 workouts × $60 per hour = $240 | $100 per airplane | $340 per airplane. |
The manufacturer will allow warranty credit for labor and parts to the extent noted in the service bulletin.
Regulatory impactPage 2
Does This AD Impact Various Entities?
The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.
Does This AD Involve a Significant Rule or Regulatory Action?
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A copy of the final evaluation prepared for this action is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained by contacting the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.
Adoption of the amendmentPage 2
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
2. FAA amends § 39.13 by adding a new AD to read as follows:
Affected TCDS · 1
The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.
Registered aircraft · 2,663
Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.
| 1969 | 6 |
|---|---|
| 1970 | 26 |
| 1971 | 28 |
| 1972 | 47 |
| 1973 | 73 |
| 1974 | 65 |
| 1975 | 98 |
| 1976 | 104 |
| 1977 | 147 |
| 1978 | 151 |
| 1979 | 130 |
| 1980 | 89 |
| 1981 | 109 |
| 1982 | 100 |
| 1983 | 77 |
| 1984 | 86 |
| 1985 | 57 |
| 1986 | 41 |
| 1987 | 39 |
| 1988 | 56 |
| 1989 | 33 |
| 1990 | 54 |
| 1991 | 66 |
| 1992 | 39 |
| 1993 | 57 |
| 1994 | 75 |
| 1995 | 55 |
| 1996 | 43 |
| 1997 | 72 |
| 1998 | 65 |
| 1999 | 66 |
| 2000 | 67 |
| 2001 | 63 |
| 2002 | 30 |
| 2003 | 8 |
| 2004 | 18 |
| 2005 | 8 |
| 2007 | 1 |
314 with no year recorded