AD 2001-24-31

Airworthiness directive · Electrical Wire Bundles · Boeing 747-100 Series, 747-100B Series, 747-100B SUD Series and 9 more

Effective
January 16, 2002
Published
December 12, 2001 · 66 FR 64102–64104
Issued
November 28, 2001
Models
747-100 Series, 747-100B Series, 747-100B SUD Series, 747-200B Series, 747-200C Series, 747-200F Series and 6 more
Data sheet
TCDSA20WE
Registered aircraft
63 matched by model
Product
Aircraft · Large airplane
Amendment
39-12548
Docket
2001-NM-219-AD
Issued as
Final rule

Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 01-30207. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed May 30, 2024.

On this page

Summary

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes, that requires performing a one-time inspection for chafing of certain electrical wire bundles behind the flight engineer's panel in the cockpit; repairing any chafed wire bundles, if necessary; and installing Teflon sleeving over the inspected wire bundles and rerouting them. This action is necessary to prevent burning of electrical wires, which could result in smoke in the cockpit and loss of function of several airplane systems. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.

The airworthiness directive

2001-24-31 Boeing: Amendment 39-12548. Docket 2001-NM-219-AD.

Applicability: Model 747 series airplanes, as listed in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-24A2118, Revision 3, dated June 24, 1999; certificated in any category.

Note 1:

This AD applies to each airplane identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For airplanes that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (c) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent chafing and burning of electrical wires, which could result in smoke in the cockpit and loss of function of several airplane systems, accomplish the following:

(a) One-Time Inspection and Follow-On Actions

PDF page 2

(a) Within 12 months after the effective date of this AD, do a one-time detailed visual inspection for chafing of certain electrical wire bundles behind the P4 flight engineer's panel in the cockpit, according to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-24A2118, Revision 3, dated June 24, 1999. If any chafing is found, before further flight, repair the chafed wire bundles according to the service bulletin. Before further flight following the inspection and repair, as applicable, wrap the electrical wire bundles with Teflon sleeving and reroute them, according to the service bulletin.

Note 2:

For the purposes of this AD, a detailed visual inspection is defined as: “An intensive visual examination of a specific structural area, system, installation, or assembly to detect damage, failure, or irregularity. Available lighting is normally supplemented with a direct source of good lighting at intensity deemed appropriate by the inspector. Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be used. Surface cleaning and elaborate access procedures may be required.”

Note 3:

Inspections and follow-on actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD according to Boeing Service Bulletin 747-24-2118, dated February 9, 1989; Revision 1, dated May 11, 1989; or Revision 2, dated December 21, 1989; are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions required by this AD.

(b) Operator's Comparable Procedure

PDF page 2

(b) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-24A2118, Revision 3, dated June 24, 1999, specifies that certain procedures may be accomplished per an “operator's comparable procedure,” the procedures must be accomplished per the applicable chapter of the Boeing 747 Airplane Maintenance Manual (AMM) specified in the service bulletin.

(c) Alternative Methods of Compliance

PDF page 2

(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Seattle ACO.

Note 4:

Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Seattle ACO.

(d) Special Flight Permits

PDF page 3

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

(e) Incorporation by Reference

PDF page 3

(e) Except as required by paragraph (b) of this AD, the actions shall be done in accordance with Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-24A2118, Revision 3, dated June 24, 1999. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

(f) Effective Date

PDF page 3

(f) This amendment becomes effective on January 16, 2002.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

DatesPage 1

Effective January 16, 2002.

The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of January 16, 2002.

AddressesPage 1

The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Boeing Commercial Airplane Group, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207. This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

For further information contactPage 1

Stephen Oshiro, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98055-4056; telephone (425) 227-2793; fax (425) 227-1181.

Supplementary informationPage 1

A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Boeing Model 747 series airplanes was published in the Federal Register on July 23, 2001 (66 FR 38211). That action proposed to require performing a one-time inspection for chafing of certain electrical wire bundles behind the flight engineer's panel in the cockpit; repairing any chafed wire bundles, if necessary; and installing Teflon sleeving over the inspected wire bundles and rerouting them.

CommentsPage 1

Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to the single comment received.

Request To Allow Use of Other Service InformationPage 1

The commenter requests that the FAA revise the proposed AD to specify that accomplishment of the necessary actions according to Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 747-24A2118, Revision 3, dated June 24, 1999, OR EARLIER REVISIONS, is acceptable for compliance. The commenter states that it has done the actions on its airplanes according to revisions of the service bulletin prior to Revision 3 and believes that this meets the intent of the proposed AD.

The FAA concurs and has added Note 3 to this final rule (and reordered subsequent notes accordingly) to state that inspections and follow-on actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD according to Boeing Service Bulletin 747-24-2118, dated February 9, 1989; Revision 1, dated May 11, 1989; or Revision 2, dated December 21, 1989; are acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions required by this AD.

ConclusionPage 2

After careful review of the available data, including the comment noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes previously described. The FAA has determined that these changes will neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.

Cost impactPage 2

There are approximately 443 Model 747 series airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 164 airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 3 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. The cost of required parts per airplane will be negligible. Based on these figures, the cost impact of this AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $29,520, or $180 per airplane.

The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other administrative actions.

Regulatory impactPage 2

The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.

Adoption of the amendmentPage 2

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:

Affected TCDS · 1

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 63

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Boeing63 aircraft
By year built
19692007
Registered aircraft by year built: 49 aircraft
19691
19702
19711
19752
19761
19892
19904
19916
19922
19932
19943
19951
19974
19981
19994
20001
20011
20023
20031
20041
20053
20073

14 with no year recorded

By model

See all 24 models

Aircraft

See all 63 aircraft