AD 2003-17-11

Airworthiness directive · Sermetel coating (Omat 7/46) · Rolls-Royce Deutschland Dart 528-7E, Dart 529-7E, Dart 529-7H and 29 more

Effective
September 30, 2003
Published
August 26, 2003 · 68 FR 51150–51152
Issued
August 19, 2003
Models
Dart 528-7E, Dart 529-7E, Dart 529-7H, Dart 529-8E, Dart 529-8H, Dart 529-8X and 26 more
Registered aircraft
6 matched by model
Product
Engine
Amendment
39-13286
Docket
2003-NE-10-AD
Issued as
Final rule

Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 03-21741. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed May 30, 2024.

On this page

Summary

The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) (formerly Rolls-Royce plc) Dart 528-7E, 529-7H, -7E, -8E, -8H, -8X, -8Y, -8Z, 529D-7E, -7H, -8E, -8H, -8X, -8Y, -8Z, 531, 532-2L, -7, -7N, -7P, -7L, -7R, 535-2, -7R, 542-4, -4K, -10, -10J, -10K, 552-2, 552-7, and -7R turboprop engines. This AD requires removal of any Sermetel coating (Omat 7/46) from certain high pressure (HP) turbine discs and intermediate pressure (IP) turbine discs, and inspection of discs after coating removal. This AD is prompted by reports of Sermetel coating (Omat 7/46) applied to certain turbine discs which, if allowed to remain on the discs would react adversely with the disc dry film lubricant, and could result in uncontained HP or IP turbine disc failure, resulting in possible damage to the airplane. We are issuing this AD to prevent uncontained HP or IP turbine disc failure, which could result in damage to the airplane.

The airworthiness directive

2003-17-11 Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG: Amendment 39-13286. Docket No. 2003-NE-10-AD.

(a) Effective Date

PDF page 1

(a) This AD becomes effective September 30, 2003.

(b) Affected ADs

PDF page 1

(b) None.

(c) Applicability

PDF page 1

(c) This AD applies to Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (RRD) (formerly Rolls-Royce plc) Dart 528-7E, 529-7H, -7E, -8E, -8H, -8X, -8Y, -8Z, 529D-7E, -7H, -8E, -8H, -8X, -8Y, -8Z, 531, 532-2L, -7, -7N, -7P, -7L, -7R, 535-2, -7R, 542-4, -4K, -10, -10J, -10K, 552-2, 552-7, and -7R turboprop engines with a high pressure (HP) turbine disc or intermediate pressure (IP) turbine disc that has a serial number (SN) listed in Table 1 of this AD installed. These engines are installed on, but not limited to, BAE Systems (Operations) Limited, Model HS 748 Series 2A and 2B airplanes, Fokker Aircraft B.V., F.27 Friendship Mark 200, 400, 500, and 600 airplanes, Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation Model G-159 “Gulfstream I” airplanes, Maryland Air Industries, Inc. F-7F, F-27A, F-27G, F-27J, F-27M, FH-227B, FH-227C, FH-227D, and FH-227E airplanes, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd Model YS-11, YS-11A-200, YS-11A-300, YS-11A-500, and YS-11A-600 airplanes. Table 1 follows:

Table 1.—Affected Turbine Discs
Turbine disc serial numberTurbine disc stageDate when coating was appliedTurbine disc cycles-since-new when coating was applied
DETN128HP31. Mar 014356
DETN155HP22. Jun 990
DETN3541HP17. Apr 012850
DETN3542HP16. Jan 016053
LA759HP27. Oct 005858
LP219HP23. Nov 996688
LW376HP21. Jul 993302
LX484HP22. Feb 004632
LZ299HP23. Dec 995839
LZ404HP13. Jul 01630
LZ555HP30. Aug 002158
LZ564HP15. Mar 014204
SG612HP20. Apr 005735
SH195HP16. Dec 995349
DETN25IP30. Aug 002158
DETN238IP31. Mar 014356
DETN240IP18. Apr 010
DETN944IP04. Mar 002200
DETN2666IP17. Apr 012850
DETN5538IP16. Jul 01630
DETN6400IP14. Apr 990
LA407IP22. Jun 005736
LA858IP27. Oct 005858
LB99IP13. Aug 999093
LE284IP24. Dec 995679
LN87IP10. May 995829
LP519IP23. Nov 996688
LW517IP22. Dec 995865
LX214IP09. Dec 006498
LX379IP22. Feb 004632
LZ248IP23. Dec 995839
LZ385IP17. Oct 019072
LZ603IP22. Jun 990
SG554IP20. Apr 005735
SH863IP16. Dec 995349

(d) Unsafe Condition

PDF page 2

(d) This AD is prompted by reports of Sermetel coating (Omat 7/46) applied to certain turbine discs which, if allowed to remain on the discs would react adversely with the disc dry film lubricant, causing uncontained HP or IP turbine disc failure, which could result in damage to the airplane. We are issuing this AD to prevent HP or IP turbine disc failure, which could result in damage to the airplane.

(e) Compliance

PDF page 2

(e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the actions have already been done.

(f) Determining if Action Is Required

PDF page 2

(f) Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD, determine the SN of the HP turbine disc and the IP turbine disc. If none of the HP and IP turbine discs with SNs listed in Table 1 are installed in the engine, no further action is required.

(g) If one or more of the discs with SNs listed in Table 1 of this AD are installed in the engine, do the following:

(1) If the engine has had a full overhaul of the turbine after the shop visit at which the Sermetel coating (Omat 7/46) was applied, no further action is required.

(2) If only the HP turbine disc is listed in Table 1, and the engine has RRD Service Bulletin No. Da72-533, Revision 3, dated October 2001, incorporated, no further action is required.

Removal of Sermetel Coating and Disc Inspection

PDF page 2

(3) Before accumulating 10,000 flight cycles since the coating was applied, completely remove Sermetel coating (Omat 7/46) from HP turbine discs and LP turbine discs. Information on coating removal can be found in RRD Overhaul Processes Manual, Overhaul Process 114.

(4) Visually inspect HP turbine discs and LP turbine discs, and return to service discs that pass inspection. Information on disc pass or fail inspection criteria can be found in the RRD Engine Overhaul Manual, Chapter 72-6-1.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance

PDF page 2

(h) Alternative methods of compliance must be requested in accordance with 14 CFR part 39.19, and must be approved by the Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA.

(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

PDF page 2

(i) None.

(j) Related Information

PDF page 2

(j) The subject of this AD is addressed in LBA airworthiness directive LTA 2003-015, dated February 6, 2003.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

DatesPage 1

This AD becomes effective September 30, 2003.

AddressesPage 1

You may get the service information identified in this AD from Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG, Eschenweg 11, D-15827 Dahlewitz, Germany; Tel: 49-33-7086-1768; Fax: 49-33-7086-3356.

You may examine the AD docket at the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA.

For further information contactPage 1

James Lawrence, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803-5299; telephone (781) 238-7176; fax (781) 238-7199.

Supplementary informationPage 1

The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39 with a proposed AD. The proposed AD applies to RRD (formerly Rolls-Royce plc) Dart 528-7E, 529-7H, -7E, -8E, -8H, -8X, -8Y, -8Z, 529D-7E, -7H, -8E, -8H, -8X, -8Y, -8Z, 531, 532-2L, -7, -7N, -7P, -7L, -7R, 535-2, -7R, 542 -4, -4K, -10, -10J, -10K, 552-2, 552-7, and -7R turboprop engines. We published the proposed AD in the Federal Register on May 5, 2003 (68 FR 23620). That action proposed to require removal of any Sermetel coating (Omat 7/46) from certain HP turbine discs and IP turbine discs, and inspection of discs after coating removal.

CommentsPage 1

We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the development of this AD. We received no comments on the proposal or on the determination of the cost to the public.

ConclusionPage 1

We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Changes to 14 CFR Part 39—Effect on the ADPage 1

On July 10, 2002, the FAA published a new version of 14 CFR part 39 (67 FR 47997, July 22, 2002), which governs the FAA's AD system. That regulation now includes material that relates to altered products, special flight permits, and alternative methods of compliance. The material previously was included in each individual AD. Since the material is included in 14 CFR part 39, we will not include it in future AD actions.

Regulatory findingsPage 1

We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:

(1) Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866;

(2) Is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by sending a request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include “AD Docket No. 2003-NE-10-AD” in your request.

Adoption of the amendmentPage 1

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

Affected TCDS · 2

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 6

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Grumman3 aircraft
  • Fairchild1 aircraft
  • Fokker1 aircraft
  • Nihon1 aircraft
By year built
19591985
Registered aircraft by year built: 5 aircraft
19591
19631
19641
19681
19851

1 with no year recorded

By model

Aircraft