AD 2004-10-14

Airworthiness directive · Crankshaft gear · Lycoming Engines AEIO-320-D1B, AEIO-320-D2B, AEIO-320-E1A and 642 more

Effective
June 25, 2004
Published
May 21, 2004 · 69 FR 29210–29212
Issued
May 12, 2004
Supersedes
AD91-14-22
Models
AEIO-320-D1B, AEIO-320-D2B, AEIO-320-E1A, AEIO-320-E1B, AEIO-320-E2A, AEIO-320-E2B and 639 more
Registered aircraft
92,250 matched by model
Product
Engine
Amendment
39-13644
Docket
89-ANE-10-AD
Issued as
Final rule

Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 04-11406. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed May 30, 2024.

On this page

Summary

The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) that supersedes an existing AD, for Lycoming Engines (formerly Textron Lycoming), direct-drive reciprocating engines (except O-145, O-320H, O-360E, LO-360E, LTO-360E, O-435, and TIO-541 series engines). That AD currently requires inspection of the crankshaft gear installation and rework or replacement of the gears where necessary after a propeller strike, sudden stoppage, at overhaul, or whenever gear train repair is required. This AD requires the same actions but makes the correction that the existing gear retaining bolt and lockplate be removed from service and new hardware installed, and revises the definitions for sudden stoppage and propeller strike. This AD results from a change to the definition of a propeller strike or sudden stoppage. We are issuing this AD to prevent loosening or failure of the crankshaft gear retaining bolt, which may cause sudden engine failure.

The airworthiness directive

2004-10-14 Lycoming Engines (formerly Textron Lycoming): Amendment 39-13644. Docket No. 89-ANE-10-AD. Supersedes AD 91-14-22, Amendment 39-6916.

(a) Effective Date

PDF page 2

(a) This AD becomes effective June 25, 2004.

(b) Affected ADs

PDF page 2

(b) This AD supersedes AD 91-14-22.

(c) Applicability

PDF page 2

(c) This AD applies to Lycoming Engines (formerly Textron Lycoming), direct-drive reciprocating engines (except O-145, O-320H, O-360E, LO-360E, LTO-360E, O-435, and TIO-541 series engines).

(d) Unsafe Condition

PDF page 2

(d) This AD results from a change to the definition of a propeller strike or sudden stoppage. The actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent loosening or failure of the crankshaft gear retaining bolt, which may cause sudden engine failure.

(e) Compliance

PDF page 2

(e) Compliance with this AD is required as indicated before further flight if the engine has experienced a propeller strike as defined in paragraphs (i) and (j) of this AD, unless already done.

(f) Inspect, and if necessary repair, the crankshaft counter bored recess, the alignment dowel, the bolt hole threads, and the crankshaft gear for wear, galling, corrosion, and fretting in accordance with steps 1 through 5 of Lycoming Mandatory Service Bulletin (MSB) No. 475C, dated January 30, 2003.

(g) Remove the existing gear retaining bolt and lockplate from service, and install a new bolt and lockplate, in accordance with steps 6 and 7 of Lycoming MSB No. 475C, dated January 30, 2003.

(h) Prohibition of Retaining Bolt and Lockplate

PDF page 3

(h) Do not install the gear retaining bolt and lockplate that were removed in paragraph (g) of this AD, into any engine.

(i) Definition of Propeller Strike

PDF page 3

(i) For the purposes of this AD, a propeller strike is defined as follows:

(1) Any incident, whether or not the engine is operating, that requires repair to the propeller other than minor dressing of the blades.

(2) Any incident during engine operation in which the propeller impacts a solid object that causes a drop in revolutions per minute (RPM) and also requires structural repair of the propeller (incidents requiring only paint touch-up are not included). This is not restricted to propeller strikes against the ground.

(3) A sudden RPM drop while impacting water, tall grass, or similar yielding medium, where propeller damage is not normally incurred.

(j) The preceding definitions include situations where an aircraft is stationary and the landing gear collapses causing one or more blades to be substantially bent, or where a hanger door (or other object) strikes the propeller blade. These cases should be handled as sudden stoppages because of potentially severe side loading on the crankshaft flange, front bearing, and seal.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance

PDF page 3

(k) The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office, has the authority to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

PDF page 3

(l) You must use Lycoming MSB No. 475C, dated January 30, 2003, to perform the inspections and repairs required by this AD. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of this service bulletin in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. You can get a copy from Lycoming Engines, 652 Oliver Street, Williamsport, PA 17701, U.S.A; telephone (570) 323-6181; fax (570) 327-7101. You can review copies at the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

(m) Related Information

PDF page 3

(m) None.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

DatesPage 1

This AD becomes effective June 25, 2004. The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations as of June 25, 2004.

AddressesPage 1

You can get the service information identified in this AD from Lycoming Engines, 652 Oliver Street, Williamsport, PA 17701, U.S.A.; telephone (570) 323-6181; fax (570) 327-7101 or from the Lycoming Web site: www.lycoming.textron.com.main.jsp.

You may examine the AD docket at the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. You may examine the service information at the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

For further information contactPage 1

Norm Perenson, Aerospace Engineer, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone (516) 228-7337; fax (516) 794-5531.

Supplementary informationPage 1

The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR Part 39, by superseding an AD with a proposed airworthiness directive (AD). The proposed AD applies to Lycoming Engines direct-drive reciprocating engines (except O-145, O-320H, O-360E, LO-360E, LTO-360E, O-435, and TIO-541 series engines). We published the proposed AD in the Federal Register on March 25, 2003 (68 FR 14350). That action proposed to require inspection of the crankshaft gear installation and rework or replacement of the gears where necessary after a propeller strike, sudden stoppage, at overhaul, or whenever gear train repair is required. That action also proposed to revise the definitions for sudden stoppage and propeller strike.

CommentsPage 2

We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the development of this AD. We have considered the comments received.

Provide a Trigger Level for ActionPage 2

One commenter requests that the proposed AD should provide a trigger level to alert maintenance personnel of the need for action. The commenter states that this is required to avoid having maintenance personnel determine the need for action. Also, this would avoid miscommunication between the pilot and the maintenance personnel. The commenter also states that the proposed AD is too general for proper action in the field.

The FAA does not agree. Section 91.7(b) of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR 91.7(b)) states: “The pilot in command of a civil aircraft is responsible for determining whether that aircraft is in condition for safe flight.” The pilot must advise the maintenance technician and inspector of the need to perform maintenance. It is also the responsibility of the maintenance technician and or inspector to advise the pilot when an unsafe condition is found during routine maintenance. The actions required by this AD, like many other situations in aviation, may require some judgment on the part of the pilot, maintenance technician, and or inspector, as well as good communication among all parties. Adding additional conditions will only require more judgment and more decisions by all parties involved.

AD as Written Will Require Unneeded InspectionsPage 2

One commenter states that the proposed AD would require unneeded inspections by “tying the hands” of knowledgeable mechanics. The commenter also states that the final determination regarding needed inspections should be made by the maintenance personnel in the field. The commenter further states that the mechanics are in the best position to evaluate the factors surrounding each incident, and to determine which engine components should be inspected.

The FAA does not agree. The wording in this AD is designed to assist the mechanics when deciding on what action to take in a given situation. Based on Lycoming's engine design knowledge and worldwide service experience, certain situations are known to have caused engine problems. This AD is not designed to “tie the hands of the mechanic”. The AD is intended to help the pilot in command and maintenance personnel make the best possible maintenance decision.

Correction to the CompliancePage 2

As a correction to the compliance, we added paragraphs to require the existing gear retaining bolt and lockplate be removed from service and a new bolt and lockplate be installed, and to prohibit installation of the removed hardware into any engine. This correction places the AD in agreement with the referenced SB.

ConclusionPage 2

We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the comments received, and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD with the changes described previously. We have determined that these changes will neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD. The assigned paragraph letters in the regulatory section have been changed from what appeared in the proposal, as we are continuing our introduction of plain language into our documents.

Regulatory findingsPage 2

We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:

(1) Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866;

(2) Is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD and placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by sending a request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include “AD Docket No. 89-ANE-10-AD” in your request.

Adoption of the amendmentPage 2

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by removing Amendment 39-6916 (56 FR 33205, July 19, 1991), and by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

Affected TCDS · 44

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

See all 44 data sheets

Registered aircraft · 92,250

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Piper36,448 aircraft
  • Cessna20,603 aircraft
  • Mooney3,860 aircraft
  • Robinson Helicopter2,538 aircraft
  • Beech1,951 aircraft
  • Other makers10,48926,850 aircraft
By year built
19102026
Registered aircraft by year built: 81,107 aircraft
19101
19241
19261
19272
19289
192911
193015
193118
19321
19333
19344
19353
193614
193717
193810
193914
194042
194193
194261
1943111
194442
194523
1946599
1947648
1948112
1949242
1950270
1951250
1952260
1953446
1954328
1955464
1956560
1957606
1958751
1959910
1960725
1961920
1962866
19631,081
19641,428
19651,753
19662,363
19672,357
19682,851
19692,376
19701,177
19711,488
19721,922
19732,481
19742,755
19752,680
19763,311
19773,410
19784,246
19793,274
19801,583
19811,513
1982702
1983446
1984490
1985422
1986232
1987220
1988242
1989365
1990321
1991368
1992355
1993389
1994369
1995424
1996469
1997605
19981,000
19991,142
20001,148
20011,004
2002916
20031,057
20041,154
20051,246
20061,132
20071,028
2008953
2009560
2010492
2011464
2012563
2013454
2014489
2015443
2016438
2017433
2018480
2019559
2020519
2021524
2022551
2023675
2024679
2025656
2026427

11,143 with no year recorded

By model

See all 385 models

Aircraft

See all 92,250 aircraft

NTSB investigations that cite this AD · 5

Their narratives or probable cause name AD 2004-10-14, often to say whether the aircraft complied with it.