AD 2004-11-01

Airworthiness directive · Engine fire extinguishing wiring · Textron BAe.125 Series 800A, BAe.125 Series 800A (C-29A), BAe.125 Series 800A (U-125) and 4 more

Effective
July 7, 2004
Published
June 2, 2004 · 69 FR 30999–31000
Issued
May 17, 2004
Models
BAe.125 Series 800A, BAe.125 Series 800A (C-29A), BAe.125 Series 800A (U-125), BAe.125 Series 800B, Hawker 800, Hawker 800 (U-125A), Hawker 800XP
Data sheet
TCDSA3EU
Registered aircraft
369 matched by model
Product
Aircraft · Large airplane
Amendment
39-13646
Docket
2003-NM-216-AD
Issued as
Final rule

Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 04-11959. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed January 21, 2026.

On this page

Summary

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain Raytheon Model BAe.125 series 800A (including C-29A and U-125 variant) and 800B airplanes; and Model Hawker 800 (including U-125A variant) and 800XP airplanes; that requires a functional test of the engine fire extinguishing wiring for the appropriate installation; verification of the correct wiring connector installation; correction of wiring if necessary; and installation of new marker bands. This action is necessary to prevent incorrect wiring of the engine fire extinguisher bottles, which could result in one or both fire extinguisher bottles being discharged into the wrong engine nacelle. This action is intended to address the identified unsafe condition.

The airworthiness directive

2004-11-01 Raytheon Aircraft Company: Amendment 39-13646. Docket 2003-NM-216-AD.

Applicability: Model BAe.125 series 800A (including C-29A and U-125 variant) and 800B airplanes; and Model Hawker 800 (including U-125A variant) and 800XP airplanes; as listed in Raytheon Service Bulletin SB 26-3610, Revision 1, dated September 2003; certificated in any category.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent incorrect wiring of the engine fire extinguisher bottles, which could result in one or both fire extinguisher bottles being discharged into the wrong engine nacelle, accomplish the following:

(a) Function Test, Verification, Installation, and Corrective Action

PDF page 2

(a) Within 70 flight hours or 30 days after the effective date of this AD, whichever occurs first, do the actions specified in paragraphs (a) (1) and (a) (2) of this AD per the Accomplishment Instructions of Raytheon Service Bulletin SB 26-3610, Revision 1, dated September 2003.

(1) Perform a functional test of the engine fire extinguishing wiring for appropriate installation, and verify the correct wiring connector installation. If any connector is wired incorrectly, prior to further flight, correct the wiring.

(2) Install the new marker bands.

(b) Exception to Service Bulletin

PDF page 2

(b) Although the service bulletin referenced in this AD specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not include such a requirement.

(c) Alternative Methods of Compliance

PDF page 2

(c) In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, is authorized to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD.

(d) Incorporation by Reference

PDF page 2

(d) The required actions shall be done in accordance with Raytheon Service Bulletin SB 26-3610, Revision 1, dated September 2003. This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Raytheon Aircraft Company, Department 62, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

(e) Effective Date

PDF page 2

(e) This amendment becomes effective on July 7, 2004.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

DatesPage 1

Effective July 7, 2004.

The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as of July 7, 2004.

AddressesPage 1

The service information referenced in this AD may be obtained from Raytheon Aircraft Company, Department 62, P.O. Box 85, Wichita, Kansas 67201-0085. This information may be examined at the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Transport Airplane Directorate, Rules Docket, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call (202) 741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

For further information contactPage 1

Jeff Pretz, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Branch, ACE-118W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 946-4153; fax (316) 946-4107.

Supplementary informationPage 1

A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to certain Raytheon Model BAe.125 series 800A (including C-29A and U-125 variant) and 800B airplanes; and Model Hawker 800 (including U-125A variant) and 800XP airplanes; was published in the Federal Register on February 26, 2004 (69 FR 8880). That action proposed to require a functional test of the engine fire extinguishing wiring for the appropriate installation; verification of the correct wiring connector installation; correction of wiring if necessary; and installation of new marker bands.

CommentsPage 2

Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. No comments were submitted in response to the proposal or the FAA's determination of the cost to the public.

ConclusionPage 2

The FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed.

Cost impactPage 2

There are approximately 615 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide fleet. The FAA estimates that 430 airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 2 work hours per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor rate is $65 per work hour. Required parts will cost approximately $20 per airplane. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $64,500, or $150 per airplane.

The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this AD action, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted. The cost impact figures discussed in AD rulemaking actions represent only the time necessary to perform the specific actions actually required by the AD. These figures typically do not include incidental costs, such as the time required to gain access and close up, planning time, or time necessitated by other administrative actions. The manufacturer may cover the cost of replacement parts associated with this proposed AD, subject to warranty conditions. Manufacturer warranty remedies may also be available for labor costs associated with this AD. As a result, the costs attributable to the AD may be less than stated above.

Regulatory impactPage 2

The regulations adopted herein will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, it is determined that this final rule does not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action: (1) Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption ADDRESSES.

Adoption of the amendmentPage 2

Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:

Affected TCDS · 1

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 369

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Raytheon253 aircraft
  • British Aerospace66 aircraft
  • Raytheon Corporate Jets40 aircraft
  • Corporate Jets8 aircraft
  • Hawker Beechcraft2 aircraft
By year built
19842007
Registered aircraft by year built: 317 aircraft
19846
19855
19862
19874
19885
19897
19906
19911
19927
19939
19946
19956
199615
199713
199821
199925
200028
200134
200235
200323
200431
200521
20065
20072

52 with no year recorded

By model

Aircraft

See all 369 aircraft