AD 2008-21-08

Airworthiness directive · Rudder and vertical fin hinge · Air Tractor AT-402, AT-402A and AT-402B

Effective
November 20, 2008
Published
October 16, 2008 · 73 FR 61343–61346
Issued
October 15, 2008
Models
AT-402, AT-402A, AT-402B
Data sheet
TCDSA17SW
Registered aircraft
160 matched by model
Product
Aircraft · Small airplane
Amendment
39-15692
Docket
FAA-2008-0749
Project
2008-CE-044-AD
Issued as
Final rule

Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document E8-24137. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed November 21, 2025.

On this page

Summary

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Air Tractor, Inc. (Air Tractor) Models AT-402, AT-402A, and AT-402B airplanes. This AD requires you to repetitively visually inspect the rudder and vertical fin hinge attaching structure for loose fasteners and inspect the rudder or vertical fin skins, spars, hinges, or brackets for cracks and/or corrosion. This AD also requires you to replace any damaged parts found as a result of the inspections and install an external doubler at the upper rudder hinge. Installation of the external doubler at the upper rudder hinge is terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements. This AD results from a report of a Model AT-402 airplane with a loose upper rudder hinge caused by fatigue. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct loose fasteners; any cracks in the rudder or vertical fin skins, spars, hinges, or brackets; or corrosion of the rudder and vertical fin hinge attaching structure. Hinge failure adversely affects ability to control yaw and has led to the rudder folding over in flight. This condition could allow the rudder to contact the elevator and affect ability to control pitch with consequent loss of control.

The airworthiness directive

2008-21-08 Air Tractor, Inc.: Amendment 39-15692; Docket No. FAA-2008-0749; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-044-AD.

(a) Effective Date

PDF page 2

(a) This AD becomes effective on November 20, 2008.

(b) Affected ADs

PDF page 2

(b) None.

(c) Applicability

PDF page 2

(c) This AD applies to Models AT-402, AT-402A, and AT-402B airplanes, serial numbers 0694 through 1176, that are certificated in any category.

(d) Unsafe Condition

PDF page 2

(d) This AD results from a report of a Model AT-402 airplane with a loose upper rudder hinge caused by fatigue. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct loose fasteners; any cracks in the rudder or vertical fin skins, spars, hinges, or brackets; or corrosion of the rudder and vertical fin hinge attaching structure. Hinge failure adversely affects ability to control yaw and has led to the rudder folding over in flight. This condition could allow the rudder to contact the elevator and affect ability to control pitch with consequent loss of control.

(e) Compliance

PDF page 2

(e) To address this problem, you must do the following, unless already done:

ActionsComplianceProcedures
(1) Inspect visually the rudder and vertical fin hinge attachment for loose fasteners; and inspect the rudder or vertical fin skins, spars, hinges, and brackets for cracks and/or corrosionInitially inspect when the airplane reaches a total of 3,500 hours time-in-service (TIS) or within the next 100 hours TIS after November 20, 2008 (the effective date of this AD), whichever occurs later. Thereafter, repetitively inspect at intervals not to exceed every 100 hours TIS. Installation of the external doubler at the upper rudder hinge required by paragraph (e)(2)(ii) or (e)(3) of this AD is terminating action for the repetitive inspections required by this ADFollow Snow Engineering Co. Service Letter #247, revised June 2, 2008.
(2) If you find any damage as a result of any inspection required by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD, you must:
(i) Replace any damaged parts with new parts; and
(ii) Do the installation of the external doubler at the upper rudder hinge.Before further flight after any inspection required by paragraph (e)(1) of this AD where you find any damaged parts. The installation of the external doubler at the upper rudder hinge required by paragraph (e)(2)(ii) or (e)(3) of this AD terminates the repetitive inspections required by this ADFollow Snow Engineering Co. Service Letter #247, revised June 2, 2008; and Snow Engineering Co. Process Specification Number 145, dated December 6, 1991.
(3) Do the installation of the external doubler at the upper rudder hingeWhen the airplane reaches a total of 5,000 hours TIS after November 20, 2008 (the effective date of this AD) or within the next 100 hours TIS after November 20, 2008 (the effective date of this AD), whichever occurs later. The installation of the external doubler at the upper rudder hinge required by paragraph (e)(2)(ii) or (e)(3) of this AD terminates the repetitive inspections required by this ADFollow Snow Engineering Co. Service Letter #247, revised June 2, 2008; and Snow Engineering Co. Process Specification Number 145, dated December 6, 1991.
(4) Do not install any rudder without the external doubler at the upper rudder hinge required by paragraph (e)(3) of this ADAs of November 20, 2008 (the effective date of this AD)Not Applicable.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

PDF page 2

(f) The Manager, Fort Worth Airplane Certification Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Andrew McAnaul, Aerospace Engineer, ASW-150 (c/o MIDO-43), 10100 Reunion Place, Suite 650, San Antonio, Texas 78216; telephone: (210) 308-3365; facsimile: (210) 308-3370. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.

(g) Material Incorporated by Reference

PDF page 2

(g) You must use Snow Engineering Co. Service Letter #247, revised June 2, 2008; and Snow Engineering Co. Process Specification Number 145, dated December 6, 1991, to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.

(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of Snow Engineering Co. Service Letter #247, revised June 2, 2008, under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

(2) On December 21, 2006 (71 FR 66661, November 16, 2006), the Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of Snow Engineering Co. Process Specification Number 145, dated December 6, 1991.

(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Air Tractor, Inc., P.O. Box 485, Olney, Texas 76374; telephone: (940) 564-5616; facsimile: (940) 564-5612; E-mail: parts@airtractor.com; Web site: http://www.airtractor.com.

(4) You may review copies at the FAA, Central Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106; or at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

DatesPage 1

This AD becomes effective on November 20, 2008.

On November 20, 2008, the Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of Snow Engineering Co. Service Letter #247, revised June 2, 2008, listed in this AD.

As of December 21, 2006 (71 FR 66661, November 16, 2006), the Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of Snow Engineering Co. Process Specification Number 145, dated December 6, 1991, listed in this AD.

AddressesPage 1

For service information identified in this AD, contact Air Tractor, Inc., P.O. Box 485, Olney, Texas 76374; telephone: (940) 564-5616; facsimile: (940) 564-5612; E-mail: parts@airtractor.com; Web site: http://www.airtractor.com.

To view the AD docket, go to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. The docket number is FAA-2008-0749; Directorate Identifier 2008-CE-044-AD.

For further information contactPage 2

Andy McAnaul, Aerospace Engineer, 10100 Reunion Pl, San Antonio, Texas 78216; telephone: (210) 308-3365; fax: (210) 308-3370.

DiscussionPage 2

On July 1, 2008, we issued a proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) to include an AD that would apply to certain Air Tractor Models AT-402, AT-402A, and AT-402B airplanes. This proposal was published in the Federal Register as a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) on July 8, 2008 (73 FR 38933). The NPRM proposed to require you to repetitively visually inspect the rudder and vertical fin hinge attaching structure for loose fasteners and inspect the rudder or vertical fin skins, spars, hinges, or brackets for cracks and/or corrosion. This AD would also require you to replace any damaged parts found as a result of the inspections and install an external doubler at the upper rudder hinge. Installation of the external doubler at the upper rudder hinge is terminating action for the repetitive inspection requirements.

CommentsPage 2

We provided the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We received no comments on the proposal or on the determination of the cost to the public.

ConclusionPage 2

We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed except for minor editorial corrections. We have determined that these minor corrections:

• Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the NPRM for correcting the unsafe condition; and

• Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was already proposed in the NPRM.

Costs of CompliancePage 2

We estimate that this AD affects 220 airplanes in the U.S. registry.

We estimate the following costs to do the inspection:

Labor costParts costTotal cost per airplaneTotal cost on U.S. operators
1 work-hour × $80 per hour = $80Not applicable$80$17,600

Any required replacements will vary depending upon the damage found, and any replacements required will vary based on the results of the inspection. Based on this, we have no way of determining the potential replacement costs for each airplane or the number of airplanes that will need the replacements based on the result of the inspections.

We estimate the following costs to do installation of the external doubler at the upper rudder hinge:

Labor costParts costTotal cost per airplaneTotal cost on U.S. operators
5 work-hours × $80 per hour = $400$217$617$135,740
Authority for This RulemakingPage 2

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44701, “General requirements.” Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this AD.

Regulatory findingsPage 2

We have determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:

1. Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a “significant rule” under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD (and other information as included in the Regulatory Evaluation) and placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary by sending a request to us at the address listed under ADDRESSES. Include “Docket No. FAA-2008-0749; Directorate Identifier 2008 CE-044-AD” in your request.

Adoption of the amendmentPage 2

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

2. FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Affected TCDS · 1

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 160

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Air Tractor160 aircraft
By year built
19882022
Registered aircraft by year built: 139 aircraft
19881
19893
19903
199114
19928
19933
19945
19955
19966
19979
199811
19997
20005
20014
20043
20055
20062
20073
20085
20093
20102
20116
20126
201313
20142
20171
20182
20201
20221

21 with no year recorded

By model

Aircraft

See all 160 aircraft