- Effective
- May 25, 2011
- Published
- April 20, 2011 · 76 FR 22007–22009
- Issued
- April 8, 2011
- Models
- 340A (SAAB SF340A), SAAB 340B
- Data sheet
- TCDSA52EU
- Registered aircraft
- 66 matched by model
- Product
- Aircraft · Large airplane
- ATA chapter
- 53 · Fuselage
- Amendment
- 39-16664
- Docket
- FAA-2010-0042
- Project
- 2009-NM-010-AD
- Issued as
- Final rule
Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 2011-9279. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed May 30, 2024.
Copies of the files this page was built from, with their SHA-256. Retrieved October 18, 2026.
| File | Size | SHA-256 | Original |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official PDF | 156 KB | 97eaa9a8…a205e04 | 2011-9279.pdf on govinfo.gov |
| Federal Register XML | 16 KB | 59b08ee8…13e06f7 | 2011-9279.xml on federalregister.gov |
| FAA DRS HTML attachment | 54 KB | 3e270f39…540d0f1 | FAA DRS (API key needed) |
| FAA DRS PDF | 41 KB | 5274c422…9c6ee26 | FAA DRS (API key needed) |
On this page
Summary
We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the products listed above. This AD requires inspecting the fuselage surface for corrosion and cracking behind the external adapter plate of the antennae installation, and repair if necessary. This AD was prompted by a report of a crack found behind the external adapter plate of the antennae during inspection. Similar cracking was found on two additional airplanes, and extensive corrosion was found on one airplane. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion and cracking behind the external adapter plate of the antennae of certain damage-tolerant structure, which could result in reduced structural integrity and consequent rapid depressurization of the airplane.
The airworthiness directive
2011-09-02 Saab AB, Saab Aerosystems: Amendment 39-16664; Docket No. FAA-2010-0042; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-010-AD.
(a) Effective Date
PDF page 1(a) This AD is effective May 25, 2011.
(b) Affected ADs
PDF page 1(b) None.
(c) Applicability
PDF page 1(c) This AD applies to Saab AB, Saab Aerosystems airplanes, certificated in any category, identified in paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, that have been modified in accordance with Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) ST00224WI-D, ST00146WI-D, or SA984GL-D.
(1) Model 340A (SAAB/SF340A) airplanes, serial numbers 004 through 159 inclusive.
(2) Model SAAB 340B airplanes, serial numbers 160 through 459 inclusive.
(d) Subject
PDF page 1(d) Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53: Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
PDF page 1(e) This AD was prompted by a report of a crack found behind the external adapter plate of the antennae during inspection. Similar cracking was found on two additional airplanes, and extensive corrosion was found on one airplane. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion and cracking behind the external adapter plate of the antennae of certain damage-tolerant structure, which could result in reduced structural integrity and consequent rapid depressurization of the airplane.
(f) Compliance
PDF page 1(f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD performed within the compliance times specified.
(g) Inspection/Corrective Actions
PDF page 1(g) Within 600 flight cycles after the effective date of this AD: Remove the external adapter plate of the antennae installation and do a general visual inspection of the fuselage surface for corrosion and cracking behind the external adapter plate of the antennae installation. If any corrosion or cracking is found, repair before further flight. If no corrosion or cracking is found, before further flight, ensure that proper corrosion protection has been applied before reinstalling the adapter plate. Do all the actions required by this paragraph in accordance with a method approved by the Manager, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA.
Note 1:
For the purposes of this AD, a general visual inspection is: “A visual examination of an interior or exterior area, installation, or assembly to detect obvious damage, failure, or irregularity. This level of inspection is made from within touching distance unless otherwise specified. A mirror may be necessary to ensure visual access to all surfaces in the inspection area. This level of inspection is made under normally available lighting conditions such as daylight, hangar lighting, flashlight, or droplight and may require removal or opening of access panels or doors. Stands, ladders, or platforms may be required to gain proximity to the area being checked.”
(h) Reporting Requirement
PDF page 3(h) At the applicable time specified in paragraph (h)(1) or (h)(2) of this AD: Submit a report of the positive findings of the inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD. Send the report to the Manager, Wichita ACO. The report must contain, at a minimum, the inspection results, a description of any discrepancies found, the airplane serial number, and the number of flight cycles and flight hours on the airplane since installation of the STC.
(1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
(2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the effective date of this AD.
(3) A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the collection of information. All responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave., SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.
(i) Special Flight Permit
PDF page 3(i) Special flight permits, as described in Section 21.197 and Section 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199), may be issued to operate the airplane to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished, but concurrence by the Manager, Wichita ACO, FAA, is required prior to issuance of the special flight permit.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
PDF page 3(j)(1) The Manager, Wichita ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in the Related Information section of this AD.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding district office.
(k) Related Information
PDF page 3(k) For more information about this AD, contact William Griffith, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-118W, FAA, Wichita ACO, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 946-4116; fax (316) 946-4107.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
PDF page 3(l) None.
Rule preamble
The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.
DatesPage 1
This AD is effective May 25, 2011.
For further information contactPage 1
William Griffith, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-118W, FAA, Wichita Aircraft Certification Office, 1801 Airport Road, Room 100, Mid-Continent Airport, Wichita, Kansas 67209; telephone (316) 946-4116; fax (316) 946-4107.
DiscussionPage 1
We issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM) (the “second supplemental NPRM”) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to the specified products. That second SNPRM was published in the Federal Register on January 20, 2011 (76 FR 3564). That second SNPRM proposed to require inspecting the fuselage surface for corrosion and cracking behind the external adapter plate of the antennae installation, and repair if necessary.
CommentsPage 1
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of the cost to the public.
Explanation of Change to ApplicabilityPage 1
We have revised the applicability of the supplemental NPRM to identify model designations as published in the most recent type certificate data sheet for the affected models.
ConclusionPage 1
We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD with the change described previously. We also determined that this change will not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.
Costs of CompliancePage 1
We estimate that this AD affects 201 airplanes of U.S. registry. The inspection will take about 4 work-hours per airplane, at an average labor rate of $85 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated cost of the AD for U.S. operators is $68,340, or $340 per airplane.
Authority for This RulemakingPage 1
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701: “General requirements.” Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory findingsPage 1
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Is not a “significant rule” under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
(3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
Adoption of the AmendmentPage 1
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
Adoption of the amendmentPage 1
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):
Affected TCDS · 1
The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.
Registered aircraft · 66
Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.
| 1985 | 2 |
|---|---|
| 1987 | 1 |
| 1989 | 1 |
| 1990 | 8 |
| 1991 | 3 |
| 1992 | 3 |
| 1993 | 4 |
| 1994 | 1 |
| 1996 | 1 |
| 1997 | 5 |
| 1998 | 7 |
| 1999 | 1 |
29 with no year recorded