AD 2013-03-14

Airworthiness directive · Power turbine (PT) baffle · Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6C-67C

Effective
March 26, 2013
Published
February 19, 2013 · 78 FR 11563–11565
Issued
February 1, 2013
Model
PT6C-67C
Data sheet
TCDSE00068EN
Registered aircraft
171 matched by model
Product
Engine
Amendment
39-17349
Docket
FAA-2012-1005
Project
2012-NE-27-AD
Issued as
Final rule

Unofficial copy from the Federal Register XML, document 2013-03266. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed May 30, 2024.

On this page

Summary

We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. (P&WC) PT6C-67C turboshaft engines. This AD requires initial and repetitive borescope inspections to verify the presence of a retaining ring securing the power turbine (PT) baffle located near the second stage PT disk. If the engine fails the inspection, this AD also requires removing the engine from service before further flight. This AD was prompted by five reported incidents of second stage PT disk damage. We are issuing this AD to prevent damage to the PT disk which, if undetected, could cause uncontained PT disk failure and loss of control of the helicopter.

The airworthiness directive

2013-03-14 Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp: Amendment 39-17349; Docket No. FAA-2012-1005; Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-27-AD.

(a) Effective Date

PDF page 2

This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective March 26, 2013.

(b) Affected ADs

PDF page 2

None.

(c) Applicability

PDF page 2

This AD applies to Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. (P&WC) PT6C-67C turboshaft engines that have not had P&WC Service Bulletin (SB) No. PT6C-72-41056 incorporated.

(d) Reason

PDF page 2

This AD was prompted by five reported incidents of second stage power turbine (PT) disk damage. We are issuing this AD to prevent damage to the PT disk which, if undetected, could cause uncontained PT disk failure and loss of control of the helicopter.

(e) Actions and Compliance

PDF page 2

Unless already done, do the following actions.

(f) Borescope Inspections

PDF page 3

(1) Borescope-inspect to verify the presence of a retaining ring securing the PT baffle located near the second stage PT disk, as follows:

(i) For engines with 2,200 PT cycles or more on the effective date of this AD, inspect within 100 operating hours or 150 PT cycles, whichever occurs first.

(ii) For engines with more than 1,400 PT cycles but fewer than 2,200 PT cycles on the effective date of this AD, inspect within 250 operating hours, 350 PT cycles, or before exceeding 2,350 PT cycles, whichever occurs first.

(iii) For engines with 1,400 PT cycles or fewer on the effective date of this AD, inspect within 500 operating hours, 750 PT cycles, or before exceeding 1,750 PT cycles, whichever occurs first.

(2) Thereafter, repetitively borescope-inspect to verify the presence of the retaining ring securing the PT baffle located near the second stage PT disk, on or before an additional 600 flight hours or 900 PT cycles, whichever occurs first.

(3) Use P&WC Alert SB No. PT6C-72-A41060, Revision 3, dated October 11, 2012, paragraphs 3.A.(1) through 3.A.(6) to do the borescope inspections required by this AD.

(4) If the retaining ring is missing or the PT baffle is out of position, then remove the engine from service before further flight.

(g) Optional Terminating Action

PDF page 3

Performing the engine improvement modifications in P&WC SB No. PT6C-72-41056, Revision 5, dated January 17, 2013, paragraphs 3.A. through 3.C.(12) and 3.E.(1) through 3.E.(15), is an optional terminating action to the repetitive inspections required by this AD.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

PDF page 3

(1) If you performed the initial borescope inspection before the effective date of this AD using P&WC Special Instruction No. 45-2011R2, dated July 27, 2011, or P&WC Alert SB No. PT6C-72-A41060, dated August 12, 2011, or Revision 1, dated September 29, 2011, or Revision 2, dated February 10, 2012, you met the requirements of paragraph (f)(1) of this AD.

(2) If you performed the engine modification before the effective date of this AD using P&WC SB No. PT6C-72-41056, dated April 1, 2011, or Revision 1, dated June 17, 2011, or Revision 2, dated October 6, 2011, or Revision 3, dated February 3, 2012, or Revision 4, dated February 13, 2012, you met the requirements of this AD and no further action is required.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

PDF page 3

The Manager, Engine Certification Office, may approve AMOCs for this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your request.

(j) Related Information

PDF page 3

(1) For more information about this AD, contact James Lawrence, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; email: james.lawrence@faa.gov; phone: 781-238-7176; fax: 781-238-7199.

(2) Refer to Transport Canada AD CF-2012-24, dated August 2, 2012, for related information.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

PDF page 3

(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.

(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.

(i) Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp (P&WC) Alert Service Bulletin (SB) No. PT6C-72-A41060, Revision 3, dated October 11, 2012.

(ii) P&WC SB No. PT6C-72-41056, Revision 5, dated January 17, 2013.

(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp., 1000 Marie-Victorin, Longueuil, Quebec, Canada, J4G 1A1; phone: 800-268-8000; fax: 450-647-2888; Web site: http://www.pwc.ca.

(4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 781-238-7125.

(5) You may view this service information at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

DatesPage 2

This AD becomes effective March 26, 2013.

The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of March 26, 2013.

AddressesPage 2

The Docket Operations office is located at Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.

For further information contactPage 2

James Lawrence, Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; email: james.lawrence@faa.gov; phone: 781-238-7176; fax: 781-238-7199.

DiscussionPage 2

We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on October 25, 2012 (77 FR 65142). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information states:

There have been 5 reported incidents of second stage Power Turbine (PT) disk damage caused by the PT baffle moving and contacting the downstream side of the second stage PT disk. In two of these incidents, the PT section of the engine failed to rotate (on ground) as a result of baffle interference.

An investigation has determined that the root cause for the PT baffle displacement and the resultant PT disk damage was due to the failure of the retaining ring that holds the PT baffle in its intended position.

CommentsPage 2

We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (77 FR 65142, October 25, 2012).

ConclusionPage 2

We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed (77 FR 65142, October 25, 2012).

Costs of CompliancePage 2

Based on the service information, we estimate that this AD will affect about 220 engines of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about six hours per engine to comply with this AD. The average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. We anticipate that two engines will fail the initial inspection. Required parts will cost about $224,636 per engine. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S. operators to be $561,472. Our cost estimate is exclusive of possible warranty coverage.

Authority for This RulemakingPage 2

Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. “Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,” describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.

We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in “Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.” Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory findingsPage 2

We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:

1. Is not a “significant regulatory action” under Executive Order 12866;

2. Is not a “significant rule” under the DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and

3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD DocketPage 2

You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office (phone: (800) 647-5527) is provided in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

Adoption of the AmendmentPage 2

Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

Adoption of the amendmentPage 2

1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Affected TCDS · 1

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 171

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Agustawestland Philadelphia76 aircraft
  • Agusta24 aircraft
  • Agusta Aerospace19 aircraft
  • Sikorsky18 aircraft
  • Bell13 aircraft
  • Other makers921 aircraft
By year built
19622026
Registered aircraft by year built: 160 aircraft
19621
19701
19731
19752
19781
19791
19803
19821
19861
19871
19884
19893
19902
19913
19932
19941
19951
19972
20031
20041
20056
20062
20075
20082
20097
20107
20117
201214
201313
20146
20153
20164
20173
20182
201911
20207
20223
20234
20248
202511
20262

11 with no year recorded

By model

Aircraft

See all 171 aircraft