- Effective
- September 15, 1989
- Models
- 22D, 23D, 24D, 24E, 33D, 33E and 6 more
- Product
- Propeller
- Amendment
- 39-6271
Unofficial copy of the text in the FAA’s Dynamic Regulatory System. The FAA’s own copy is the authoritative one. DRS record last changed May 30, 2024.
Copies of the files this page was built from, with their SHA-256. Retrieved October 18, 2026.
| File | Size | SHA-256 | Original |
|---|---|---|---|
| FAA DRS HTML | 30 KB | 0878974e…b431e2f | FAA DRS (API key needed) |
On this page
Affected TCDS · 12
The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.
TCDS P-603Hamilton SundstrandTCDS P-719Hamilton Standard DivisionTCDS P-736Hamilton Standard DivisionTCDS P-749Hamilton Standard DivisionTCDS P-784Hamilton Standard DivisionTCDS P-785Hamilton Standard DivisionTCDS P-786Hamilton Standard DivisionTCDS P-851Hamilton Standard DivisionTCDS P-856Hamilton Standard DivisionTCDS P-871Hamilton Standard DivisionTCDS P-881Hamilton Standard DivisionTCDS P-887Hamilton Standard Division
Registered aircraft
No registered aircraft matched this AD’s modelsForeign aircraft aren’t included, and ADs on propellers and appliances aren’t matched by model.
NTSB investigations that cite this AD · 2
Their narratives or probable cause name AD 81-13-06, often to say whether the aircraft complied with it.
NTSB LAX02LA257Accident · No injuriesLimited investigationFinal reportAir Tractor AT-301 · Dos Palos, CAthe failure of the propeller blade due to fatigue. Factors in the accident were the inadequate maintenance-repair of the blade, and, inadequate pilot preflight inspections.NTSB FTW99FA148Accident · 1 fatalField investigationFinal reportBeech C18S · Waldron, ARthe separation of a propeller blade in cruise flight as a result of fatigue cracking emanating from surface corrosion pitting.