AD 94-06-04

Airworthiness directive · Mask Regulators · Airbus A320-111, A320-211, A320-212 and 19 more

Effective
May 23, 1994
Published
March 22, 1994
Issued
March 7, 1994
Models
A320-111, A320-211, A320-212, A320-214, A320-231, A320-232 and 16 more
Registered aircraft
783 matched by model
Product
Appliance
Amendment
39-8852
Docket
93-ANE-18

Unofficial copy of the text in the FAA’s Dynamic Regulatory System. The FAA’s own copy is the authoritative one. DRS record last changed November 21, 2025.

On this page

Summary

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to EROS series MF10-( )-( ) full face quick donning mask regulators, that requires replacement of the face piece and the mask shell securing screw. This amendment is prompted by reports of the plastic pin breaking which secures the mask shell with the face piece. The actions specified by this AD are intended to prevent the failure of the pin securing the mask shell to the face piece, which could result in a mask leaking oxygen and the crew losing consciousness.

The airworthiness directive

94-06-04 EROS: Amendment 39-8852. Docket 93-ANE-18.

Applicability: EROS series MF10-( )-( ) full face quick donning mask regulators installed on but not limited to Airbus A320, Boeing 747-400, British Aerospace (BAe) 125-600 and Jetstream 41, Canadair RJ, Dassault Mystere Falcon 20, McDonnell Douglas MD11, and Piper PA31T and PA42 series aircraft.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent failure of the pin securing the mask shell to the face piece, which could result in a mask leaking oxygen and the crew losing consciousness, accomplish the following:

(a) For EROS Model MF10-05-01 full face quick donning mask regulators, within six months after the effective date of this AD, replace the face piece and mask shell securing screw in accordance with EROS Service Bulletin (SB) No. MF10-35-44, dated July 15, 1991.

(b) For all other EROS series MF10-( )-( ) full face quick donning mask regulators, within six months after theeffective date of this AD, replace the face piece and mask shell securing screw in accordance with EROS SB No. MF10-35-46, Revision 1, dated June 12, 1992.

(c) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Boston Aircraft Certification Office. The request should be forwarded through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Boston Aircraft Certification Office. NOTE: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, if any, may be obtained from the Boston Aircraft Certification Office.

(d) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with FAR 21.197 and 21.199 to operate the aircraft to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

(e) The modification shall be done in accordance with the following service bulletins:

Document No. Pages Revision Date

EROS SB No. MF10-35-44

1-8

Original

July 15, 1991

Total Pages: 8.

EROS SB No. MF10-35-46

1-7

1

June 12, 1992

Total Pages: 7.

This incorporation by reference was approved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from EROS, P.O. Box 10, 78370 Plaisir, France. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Assistant Chief Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

(f) This amendment becomes effective on May 23, 1994.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

Supplementary information

A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that is applicable to EROS series MF10-( )-( ) full face quick donning mask regulators was published in the Federal Register on August 4, 1993 (58 FR 41441). That action proposed to require replacement of the face piece and the mask shell securing screw in accordance with EROS Service Bulletin (SB) No. MF10-35-44, and SB No. MF10-35-46, both dated June 11, 1991.

Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to the comments received.

One commenter states that the AD should include a means for the flight crew to determine that the old masks are not defective. The FAA does not concur. The flight crew should be able to readily see whether or not the original mask is broken. The pin can be inspected in accordance with EROS SB No. MF-10-35-43, dated June 11, 1991, to determine if the mask is intact.

One commenter states that the compliance period should be 12 months after the effective date of this AD, as the proposed 6-month compliance period would cost operators an additional $110,000 for the purchase of additional masks to use while in the process of inspecting those masks already in service. The FAA does not concur. EROS SB No. MF10-35-44 was issued on July 15, 1991, and service data indicates that a substantial portion of the masks in service have already been inspected. The FAA believes that the proposed 6-month compliance period properly balances the needs of flight safety with operations concerns of operators. Although the NPRM stated the date of this SB as June 11, 1991, the correct date for this SB is July 15, 1991. In addition, the NPRM referred to the original version of EROS SB No. MF10-35-46, dated June 11, 1991. The correct revision and date for this SB is Revision 1, dated June 12, 1992. The final rule has been changed accordingly.

After careful review of the available data, including the comments noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule with the changes described previously.

The FAA estimates that 2,500 regulators are affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 0.5 work hours per regulators to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor rate is $55 per work hour. Required parts will cost $535 per faceplate. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the proposed AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $1,406,250. The manufacturer has advised the FAA, however, that it may supply the require parts at no cost, thereby reducing the total cost impact on U.S. operators.

The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities amongthe various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A final evaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES."

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air Transportation, Aircraft, Aviation Safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

Adoption of theAmendment Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations as follows:

PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. App. 1354(a), 1421 and 1423; 49 U.S.C. 106(g); and 14 CFR 11.89.

§39.13 - (AMENDED) 2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding the following new airworthiness directive:

Affected TCDS · 9

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 783

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Airbus377 aircraft
  • Airbus Industrie184 aircraft
  • Piper146 aircraft
  • Boeing53 aircraft
  • Dassault-Breguet14 aircraft
  • Other makers49 aircraft
By year built
19672019
Registered aircraft by year built: 700 aircraft
19672
19681
19691
19721
19742
19753
19768
197710
197820
197917
198011
198112
19822
19832
198418
198510
19861
19873
19894
19907
19919
199216
199311
19946
19955
19967
199712
199826
199936
200036
200137
200228
200320
200419
200521
200625
200723
200820
200920
201017
201126
201232
201329
201419
201522
201614
201716
201811
20192

83 with no year recorded

By model

See all 41 models

Aircraft

See all 783 aircraft