AD 97-11-02 R1

Airworthiness directive · Inspect Intercostal Of Third Crew Seat · BAE Systems Jetstream Model 4101

Effective
February 17, 1998
Published
January 12, 1998 · 63 FR 1737–1738
Model
Jetstream Model 4101
Data sheet
TCDSA41NM
Product
Aircraft · Large airplane
Amendment
39-10276
Docket
97-NM-127-AD
Issued as
Final rule

Unofficial copy of the text in the FAA’s Dynamic Regulatory System. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed May 30, 2024.

On this page

Summary

This amendment revises an existing airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to certain British Aerospace (Jetstream) Model 4101 airplanes, that currently requires an inspection to determine the thickness of the intercostal that attaches the third crew member seat to the floor structure in the flight compartment, and replacement, if necessary. That action was prompted by a report from the manufacturer indicating that intercostals have been installed that are not of sufficient thickness (and consequent strength) to support the third crew member seat during emergency landing dynamic conditions. The actions specified by that AD are intended to prevent the failure of this intercostal during an emergency landing, which could consequently result in injury to the flight crew. This amendment revises the applicability of the existing AD by removing several airplanes.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

Supplementary information

A proposal to amend part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) by revising AD 97-11-02, amendment 39-10031 (62 FR 28795, May 28, 1997), which is applicable to certain British Aerospace (Jetstream) Model 4101 airplanes, was published in the Federal Register on October 14, 1997 (62 FR 53272). The action proposed to continue to require a one-time inspection of the intercostal of the third crew member seat to the floor structure in the flight compartment to determine the thickness of this part, and replacement with a new intercostal of the correct thickness, if necessary. The action also proposed to limit the applicability of the existing AD by removing several airplanes. Comments

Interested persons have been afforded an opportunity to participate in the making of this amendment. Due consideration has been given to the two comments received.

Both commenters support the proposed rule. Conclusion

After careful review of the available data, including the comments noted above, the FAA has determined that air safety and the public interest require the adoption of the rule as proposed. Cost Impact

Since this AD merely deletes airplanes from the applicability of the existing AD, it adds no additional costs, and requires no additional work to be performed by affected operators. The current costs associated with this AD are reiterated in their entirety (as follows) for the convenience of affected operators:

The FAA estimates that 14 Jetstream Model 4101 airplanes of U.S. registry will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 1 work hour per airplane to accomplish the required actions, and that the average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Based on these figures, the cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $840, or $60 per airplane.

The cost impact figure discussed above is based on assumptions that no operator has yet accomplished any of the requirements of this ADaction, and that no operator would accomplish those actions in the future if this AD were not adopted. Regulatory Impact

The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this action (1) is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a "significant rule" under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and (3) will not have a significant economic impact, positive or negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. A finalevaluation has been prepared for this action and it is contained in the Rules Docket. A copy of it may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES."

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

39.13 [Amended] 2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing amendment 39-10031 (62 FR 28795, May 28, 1997), and by adding a new airworthiness directive (AD), amendment 39-10276, to read as follows:

Affected TCDS · 1

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft

No registered aircraft matched this AD’s modelsForeign aircraft aren’t included, and ADs on propellers and appliances aren’t matched by model.