AD 99-09-17

Historical

Airworthiness directive · Crankshaft · Teledyne Continental Motors IO-470-A, IO-470-C, IO-470-D and 114 more

Superseded by
AD99-19-01
Models
IO-470-A, IO-470-C, IO-470-D, IO-470-E, IO-470-F, IO-470-G and 111 more
Registered aircraft
39,721 matched by model
Product
Engine
Docket
99-NE-28

Unofficial copy of the text in the FAA’s Dynamic Regulatory System. The FAA’s own copy is the authoritative one. DRS record last changed August 7, 2025.

On this page

The airworthiness directive

99-09-17 TELEDYNE CONTINENTAL MOTORS: Priority Letter issued on April 22, 1999. Docket No. 99-NE-28-AD.

Applicability: Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) O-470, IO-470, TSIO-470, IO-520, TSIO-520, LTSIO-520, IO-550, TSIO-550 and TSIOL-550 series new and rebuilt reciprocating engines, manufactured between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 1998, inclusive, listed by serial number (S/N) in TCM Critical Service Bulletin (CSB) 99-3, dated April 19, 1999, and any other engine from the above series that has had a new crankshaft installed that was manufactured between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 1998, inclusive.

Note 1: Engine S/Ns can be found in log books or other maintenance records. For those engines that were overhauled in the field with factory new crankshafts, crankshaft S/Ns should be shown in work orders, log books, or other maintenance records.

Note 2: This Priority Letter Airworthiness Directive (AD) applies to each engine identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For engines that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (e) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.

To prevent crankshaft failure due to No. 2 and No. 5 cheek cracks, which could result in total engine power loss, in-flight engine failure, and possible forced landing, accomplish the following:

(a) For those engines listed by S/N on pages 3 through 12 of TCM CSB99-3 dated April 19, 1999, with 300 hours or less time-in-service (TIS) upon receipt of this priority letter AD, perform the crankshaft visual and ultrasonic (UT) inspections within 10 hours TIS after receipt of this priority letter AD, in accordance with sections A and B of TCM CSB 99-3, dated April 19, 1999. These inspections must be performed by TCM representatives.

(1) If a crack is found, replace the crankshaft with a serviceable crankshaft of the same part number (P/N) prior to further flight.

(2) If no crack is found, reassemble the engine and return it to service.

(b) For those engines listed by S/N on pages 3 through 12 of TCM CSB 99-3, dated April 19, 1999, with more than 300 hours TIS upon receipt of this priority letter AD, perform the crankshaft visual and UT inspections at the next maintenance event, or within 50 hours TIS after receipt of this priority letter AD, whichever occurs first, in accordance with sections A and B of TCM CSB 99-3, dated April 19, 1999. These inspections must be performed by TCM representatives.

(1) If a crack is found, replace the crankshaft with a serviceable crankshaft of the same P/N prior to further flight.

(2) If no crack is found, reassemble the engine and return it to service.

(c) For any other engine with a crankshaft installed that was manufactured between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 1998, with 300 hours or less TIS upon receipt of this priority letter AD, perform the crankshaft visual and UT inspections within 10 hours TIS after receipt of this priority letter AD, in accordance with sections A and B of TCM CSB 99-3, dated April 19, 1999. These inspections must be performed by TCM representatives.

(1) If a crack is found, replace the crankshaft with a serviceable crankshaft of the same P/N prior to further flight.

(2) If no crack is found, reassemble the engine and return it to service.

(d) For any other engine with a crankshaft installed that was manufactured between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 1998, with more than 300 hours TIS upon receipt of this priority letter AD, perform the crankshaft visual and UT inspections at the next maintenance event, or within 50 hours TIS after receipt of this priority letter AD, whichever occurs first, in accordance with sections A and B of TCM CSB 99-3, dated April 19, 1999. These inspections must be performed by TCM representatives.

(1) If a crack is found, replace the crankshaft with a serviceable crankshaft of the same P/N prior to further flight.

(2) If no crack is found, reassemble the engine and return it to service.

Note 3: Engines and crankshafts that are the subject of this priority letter AD were manufactured between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 1998, inclusive. Purchase and delivery dates of engines/crankshafts produced in December 1998 could have been in the January/February 1999 time frame and are therefore affected by this AD. Likewise, engines/crankshafts purchased/delivered in January/February 1998 could have been December 1997 production and are not affected by this AD. Use the S/N of the engine or crankshaft to determine applicability: engine S/Ns are listed in TCM CSB 99-3, dated April 19, 1999, while the crankshafts, not listed by S/N, were manufactured during 1998. See Note 4 for information on identifying crankshafts.

Note 4: The following information is provided to avoid confusion in crankshaft S/N interpretation. A typical crankshaft S/N could be C229805N. The first letter is the month of manufacture beginning with A - January and ending with L - December; therefore, C is March. The next two digits are the day of the month; in this example, the 22nd. The next two digits are the year; in this example 1998. The final two digits are the sequential number of the crankshaft for a given day; in the example, this was the 5th crankshaft produced that day. The final letter, "N", identifies this as a crankshaft S/N. Therefore, for this example: we have the 5th crankshaft produced on March 22, 1998. For all practical purposes, you only need look for the year, i.e. 98 (fourth and fifth positions in the S/N sequence) because that will determine AD effectivity. The crankshaft S/N is stamped on the edge of the propeller flange.

Note 5: The engine S/Ns listed in TCM CSB 99-3 contain only the numerical portion of the S/N. Rebuilt engines will have the letter "R" at the end of the six digit numerical portion while new engines use only the six digit numerical sequence.

(e) An alternative method of compliance or adjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office. Operators shall submit their requests through an appropriate FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may add comments and then send it to the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office.

Note 6: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this airworthiness directive, if any, may be obtained from the Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office.

(f) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the aircraft to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

(g) Copies of the applicable service information may be obtained from Teledyne Continental Motors, PO Box 90, Mobile, AL 36601; telephone toll free (888) 826-5874. This information may be examined at the FAA, New England Region, Office of the Regional Counsel, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA.

(h) Priority Letter AD 99-09-17, issued April 22, 1999, becomes effective upon receipt.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

Supplementary information

DATE: April 22, 1999 99-09-17 The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has received reports of crankshaft failures on Teledyne Continental Motors (TCM) O-470, IO-470, TSIO-470, IO-520, TSIO-520, LTSIO-520, IO-550, TSIO-550, and TSIOL-550 series reciprocating engines. Since December 1998, the FAA obtained information regarding 7 crankshaft failures. The investigation revealed that the crankshafts failed due to cracks through the No. 2 or No. 5 cheeks. Analysis indicated that the crankshaft failures occurred early in the life of a new crankshaft, from 80 to 175 hours time-in-service (TIS). In addition, one crankshaft was found which had not failed but which had a crack initiation. TCM has advised the FAA that all of the fractures were due to a discrepancy in the counterweight bushing installation process, involving a tool which can damage the nitride surface of the cheek sufficient to create a crack which will propagate through the nitride layer. Such a crack will always result in failure of the crankshaft. All of the fractures have been grouped around certain manufacturing dates between January 1998 and December 1998, inclusive. Review of the manufacturing processes, basic metallurgy, nitride characteristics, dimensional characteristics, and supplier practices have not identified any other contributing causes. This condition, if not corrected, could result in crankshaft failure due to No. 2 and No. 5 cheek cracks, which could result in total engine power loss, in-flight engine failure, and possible forced landing.

The FAA has reviewed and approved the technical contents of TCM Critical Service Bulletin (CSB) 99-3, dated April 19, 1999, that lists serial numbers (S/Ns) of affected engines that were manufactured between January 1998 and December 1998, inclusive. This CSB also describes procedures for visual and ultrasonic (UT) inspections of specific areas of the No. 2 and No. 5 crankshaft cheeks. All inspections must be performed by TCM representatives, since it is a new procedure that only TCM-trained personnel are currently authorized to perform.

Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to exist or develop on other engines of this same type design, this priority letter airworthiness directive (AD) requires a one-time visual and UT inspection of the No. 2 and No. 5 crankshaft cheeks for cracks. All crankshaft cheeks found cracked must be replaced with a serviceable crankshaft prior to further flight. There are approximately 80,000 TCM O-470, IO-470, TSIO-470, IO-520, TSIO-520, LTSIO-520, IO-550, TSIO-550 and TSIOL-550 series reciprocating engines in the worldwide fleet, with approximately 68,000 in the U.S. fleet. 3,200 crankshafts were manufactured during the affected time period. Engines that were not manufactured, rebuilt, or overhauled, or that did not have a crankshaft installed in the field during that time period are not affected by this priority letter AD, which can be verified through log books or other maintenance records. Engines that may have an affected crankshaft installed must be checked for engine S/Ns listed in TCM CSB 99-3, dated April 19, 1999, and must be inspected for the S/Ns of field-installed new crankshafts manufactured between January 1, 1998, and December 31, 1998, inclusive. The actions are required to be accomplished in accordance with the CSB described previously.

This rule is issued under 49 U.S.C. Section 44701 (formerly section 601 of the Federal Aviation Act of 1958) pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, and is effective immediately upon receipt of this priority letter.

Affected TCDS · 10

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 39,721

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Cessna21,811 aircraft
  • Beech10,091 aircraft
  • Cirrus Design4,007 aircraft
  • Raytheon597 aircraft
  • Bellanca581 aircraft
  • Other makers5372,634 aircraft
By year built
19182026
Registered aircraft by year built: 35,460 aircraft
19181
19321
19422
19433
19442
19452
194618
194725
194825
194910
195025
195188
195223
1953284
1954245
1955449
1956615
1957696
1958678
1959736
1960803
1961724
1962883
1963775
19641,108
19651,043
19661,254
1967953
19681,026
1969886
1970488
1971479
1972847
19731,227
19741,083
19751,413
19761,441
19771,425
19781,465
19791,648
19801,003
1981931
1982398
1983210
1984227
1985225
1986131
1987122
1988152
1989109
1990142
1991138
199286
1993100
1994124
1995100
199685
1997126
1998125
1999163
2000160
2001227
2002288
2003316
2004465
2005520
2006617
2007549
2008471
2009183
2010171
2011146
201283
2013122
2014140
2015166
2016156
2017127
2018106
2019106
2020101
202186
2022105
2023109
2024122
2025150
202672

4,261 with no year recorded

By model

See all 97 models

Aircraft

See all 39,721 aircraft

NTSB investigations that cite this AD · 6

Their narratives or probable cause name AD 99-09-17, often to say whether the aircraft complied with it.

NTSB WPR23FA275Accident · 1 fatalClass 3 · FieldFinal reportCessna T310R · Santa Fe, NMA total loss of left engine power as a result of improper installation of the aft-facing crankshaft counterweight retaining rings. Also causal was the pilot’s failure to maintain adequate airspeed following the loss of left engine power, which resulted in the…Jul 18, 2023 · N5251C · Substantial damageNTSB ERA15LA092Accident · Serious injuriesLimited investigationFinal reportBeech V35B · Long View, NCThe improper installation of the lower rear crankshaft counterweight snap rings by unknown maintenance personnel, which resulted in the separation of the counterweight and a subsequent total loss of engine power during initial climb.Jan 6, 2015 · N246JT · Substantial damageNTSB ANC01IA058Incident · No injuriesIncident investigationFinal reportCessna 207 · Quinhagak, AKAn in-flight fracture of the engine crankshaft during descent, precipitated by restricted oil flow through an internal engine oil passage/port.May 18, 2001 · N917AC · Minor damageNTSB FTW00FA144Accident · 2 fatalField investigationFinal reportCessna 210L · Mack, COThe pilot's continued VFR flight into instrument meteorological conditions. Factors were the mountain obscuration and the rising terrain.May 8, 2000 · N732ER · Substantial damageNTSB LAX00GA102Accident · No injuriesFinal reportCessna T210M · Elfrida, AZThe company mechanic's failure to correctly install one or more of the crankshaft counterweight pin retaining plate snap rings, specifically ensuring that the snap rings were fully seated in their grooves. This led to the complete separation of the No. 2…Feb 16, 2000 · N761KC · Substantial damageNTSB DEN99FA137Accident · 1 fatalField investigationFinal reportCessna T210M · Clovis, NMThe pilot's failure to maintain sufficient airspeed during final approach to landing, resulting in an inadvertent stall. A factor was the high density altitude.Aug 6, 1999 · N6687B · Destroyed