AD 99-19-30

Airworthiness directive · Tail Gearbox Forward Fairing · Sikorsky S-76A, S-76B and S-76C

Effective
October 4, 1999
Published
September 17, 1999 · 64 FR 50442–50443
Issued
September 7, 1999
Models
S-76A, S-76B, S-76C
Data sheet
TCDSH1NE
Registered aircraft
154 matched by model
Product
Aircraft · Rotorcraft
Amendment
39-11317
Docket
99-SW-44-AD
Issued as
Final rule; request for comments

Unofficial copy of the text in the FAA’s Dynamic Regulatory System. Only the govinfo PDF is the legal edition. DRS record last changed May 30, 2024.

On this page

Summary

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) applicable to Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S-76A, B, and C helicopters. This action requires conducting a visual inspection to detect disbonding of the attachment angle between the tail gearbox forward fairing (fairing) and the pylon and replacing or repairing the attachment angles as necessary. This amendment is prompted by incidents, two in flight and eight on the ground, of fairing bonding failures. The actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent separation of the fairing, damage to the tail rotor blades, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

The airworthiness directive

99-19-30 SIKORSKY AIRCRAFT CORPORATION: Amendment 39-11317. Docket No. 99-SW-44-AD.

Applicability: Model S-76A, B, and C helicopters, certificated in any category.

NOTE 1: This AD applies to each helicopter identified in the preceding applicability provision, regardless of whether it has been otherwise modified, altered, or repaired in the area subject to the requirements of this AD. For helicopters that have been modified, altered, or repaired so that the performance of the requirements of this AD is affected, the owner/operator must request approval for an alternative method of compliance in accordance with paragraph (d) of this AD. The request should include an assessment of the effect of the modification, alteration, or repair on the unsafe condition addressed by this AD; and, if the unsafe condition has not been eliminated, the request should include specific proposed actions to address it.

Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished previously.To prevent separation of the tail gearbox forward fairing (fairing), damage to the tail rotor blades, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter, accomplish the following:

(a) Within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS), conduct a visual inspection of the attachment angle on each fairing, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph A, of Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. Alert Service Bulletin 76-55-16, dated May 12, 1999 (ASB).

(b) Thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 1500 hours TIS, conduct a visual inspection of the attachment angle on each fairing in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph A, of the ASB.

(c) If the visual inspection in paragraphs (a) or (b) reveals a disbond area that equals or exceeds 1.0 square inch, prior to further flight, repair or replace the attachment angle with an airworthy attachment angle in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph B, of the ASB.

(d) An alternative method of compliance oradjustment of the compliance time that provides an acceptable level of safety may be used if approved by the Manager, Boston Aircraft Certification Office. Operators shall submit their requests through an FAA Principal Maintenance Inspector, who may concur or comment and then send it to the Manager, Boston Aircraft Certification Office.

NOTE 2: Information concerning the existence of approved alternative methods of compliance with this AD, if any, may be obtained from the Boston Aircraft Certification Office.

(e) Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with sections 21.197 and 21.199 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199) to operate the helicopter to a location where the requirements of this AD can be accomplished.

(f) The inspection, repair, or replacement shall be done in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions in Sikorsky Aircraft Corp. Alert Service Bulletin 76-55-16, dated May 12, 1999. This incorporation by reference wasapproved by the Director of the Federal Register in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies may be obtained from Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Attn: Manager, Commercial Tech Support, 6900 Main Street, P. O. Box 9729, Stratford, Connecticut 06497-9129, phone (203) 386-7860, fax (203) 386-4703. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas; or at the Office of the Federal Register, 800 North Capitol Street, NW., suite 700, Washington, DC.

(g) This amendment becomes effective on October 4, 1999.

Rule preamble

The FAA’s background, reasoning and cost estimate, published with the AD.

Supplementary information

This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) applicable to Sikorsky Model S-76A, B, and C helicopters. This action requires, within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS), conducting a visual inspection for disbonding on any attachment angle between the fairing and the pylon. Thereafter, a visual inspection is required at intervals not to exceed 1500 hours TIS. If a bonding failure of one square inch or larger is found on the attachment angle, this AD requires repairing or replacing the attachment angle. This amendment is prompted by incidents, two in flight and eight on the ground, of fairing bonding failures. The actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent a separation of the fairing, damage to the tail rotor blades, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

The FAA has reviewed Sikorsky Alert Service Bulletin 76-55-16, dated May 12, 1999 (ASB), which describes procedures for inspecting for disbonding on the attachment anglebetween the fairing and the pylon and either repairing or replacing, as necessary, the attachment angle. The ASB also describes a recurring 1500-hour TIS inspection.

Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to exist or develop on other Sikorsky Model S-76A, B, and C helicopters of the same type design, this AD is being issued to prevent separation of the fairing, damage to the tail rotor blades, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. This AD requires visually inspecting the attachment angle on each fairing for disbonding and repairing or replacing the attachment angle as appropriate. The actions are required to be accomplished in accordance with the ASB described previously. The short compliance time involved is required because the previously described critical unsafe condition can adversely affect the structural integrity of the helicopter. Therefore, visually inspecting the attachment angle on each fairing for disbonding and repairing or replacing the attachment angle, as appropriate, within 50 hours TIS, is required and this AD must be issued immediately.

Since a situation exists that requires the immediate adoption of this regulation, it is found that notice and opportunity for prior public comment hereon are impracticable, and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days.

The FAA estimates that 150 helicopters will be affected by this AD, that it will take approximately 4 work hours to accomplish the inspection and 8 work hours to replace the attachment angle. The average labor rate is $60 per work hour. Required parts will cost approximately $880 per helicopter. Based on these figures, the total cost impact of the AD on U.S. operators is estimated to be $240,000.

Comments Invited Although this action is in the form of a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight safety and, thus, was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public comment, comments areinvited on this rule. Interested persons are invited to comment on this rule by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they may desire. Communications should identify the Rules Docket number and be submitted in triplicate to the address specified under the caption "ADDRESSES." All communications received on or before the closing date for comments will be considered, and this rule may be amended in light of the comments received. Factual information that supports the commenter's ideas and suggestions is extremely helpful in evaluating the effectiveness of the AD action and determining whether additional rulemaking action would be needed.

Comments are specifically invited on the overall regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the rule that might suggest a need to modify the rule. All comments submitted will be available, both before and after the closing date for comments, in the Rules Docket for examination by interested persons. A report thatsummarizes each FAA-public contact concerned with the substance of this AD will be filed in the Rules Docket.

Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments submitted in response to this rule must submit a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: Comments to Docket No. 99-SW-44-AD. The postcard will be date stamped and returned to the commenter.

The regulations adopted herein will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. Therefore, in accordance with Executive Order 12612, it is determined that this final rule does not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a Federalism Assessment.

The FAA has determined that this regulation is an emergency regulation that must be issued immediately to correct an unsafe condition inaircraft, and that it is not a "significant regulatory action" under Executive Order 12866. It has been determined further that this action involves an emergency regulation under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979). If it is determined that this emergency regulation otherwise would be significant under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures, a final regulatory evaluation will be prepared and placed in the Rules Docket. A copy of it, if filed, may be obtained from the Rules Docket at the location provided under the caption "ADDRESSES."

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows: PART 39 - AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES 1. The authority citation for part39 continues to read as follows: Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 39.13 [Amended] 2. Section 39.13 is amended by adding a new airworthiness directive to read as follows:

Affected TCDS · 1

The type certificate data sheets for the models this AD names, matched by model and maker.

Registered aircraft · 154

Registered aircraft whose airframe or engine model this AD names. Matched by model only, so check each against the AD’s applicability.

By aircraft maker
  • Sikorsky131 aircraft
  • Keystone Helicopter23 aircraft
By year built
19802011
Registered aircraft by year built: 117 aircraft
19802
19813
19831
19841
19853
19861
19873
19884
19894
19901
19913
19922
19943
19952
19963
19975
19984
19994
20001
20013
20025
20032
20045
20057
20067
200714
200813
20098
20102
20111

37 with no year recorded

By model

Aircraft

See all 154 aircraft