19950204001059A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Piper PA-28-140 · St Louis, MO · February 4, 1995

Date
February 4, 1995
Place
St Louis, MO
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N694SK
NTSB investigation
NTSBCHI95LA081
Reported as
Piper PA28140
Fatal injuries
0

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Aircraft landed on top of a building, partially through the roof. (-4)the pilot said the airplane was difficult to start after numerous fuel priming actions and two start attempts. It started on the third attempt after using what he described as a flooded engine start. Ten minutes after takeoff the engine sputtered and RPM dropped to 1,500. The pilot applied carburetor heat, chose alternate magneto positions, turned on the electric fuel pump, and adjusted the mixture to no avail. He said the power fluctuated before the engine lost all its power. A witness observed a fluid coming from the airplane as it flew overhead. The fluid landed on his windshield and evaporated. During the forced landing, the airplane impacted the roof of an abandoned two-story building. The engine, fuel, and ignition systems examination revealed no anomalies that would prevent power production. Soot and carbon-like deposits were on the carburetor's venturi and spark plugs. A carburetor icing probability chart showed carburetor icing was not probable.

As the FAA filed it

AIRCRAFT LANDED ON TOP OF A BUILDING, PARTIALLY THROUGH THE ROOF. (-4)THE PILOT SAID THE AIRPLANE WAS DIFFICULT TO START AFTER NUMEROUS FUEL PRIMING ACTIONS AND TWO START ATTEMPTS. IT STARTED ON THE THIRD ATTEMPT AFTER USING WHAT HE DESCRIBED AS A FLOODED ENGINE START. TEN MINUTES AFTER TAKEOFF THE ENGINE SPUTTERED AND RPM DROPPED TO 1,500. THE PILOT APPLIED CARBURETOR HEAT, CHOSE ALTERNATE MAGNETO POSITIONS, TURNED ON THE ELECTRIC FUEL PUMP, AND ADJUSTED THE MIXTURE TO NO AVAIL. HE SAID THE POWER FLUCTUATED BEFORE THE ENGINE LOST ALL ITS POWER. A WITNESS OBSERVED A FLUID COMING FROM THE AIRPLANE AS IT FLEW OVERHEAD. THE FLUID LANDED ON HIS WINDSHIELD AND EVAPORATED. DURING THE FORCED LANDING, THE AIRPLANE IMPACTED THE ROOF OF AN ABANDONED TWO-STORY BUILDING. THE ENGINE, FUEL, AND IGNITION SYSTEMS EXAMINATION REVEALED NO ANOMALIES THAT WOULD PREVENT POWER PRODUCTION. SOOT AND CARBON-LIKE DEPOSITS WERE ON THE CARBURETOR'S VENTURI AND SPARK PLUGS. A CARBURETOR ICING PROBABILITY CHART SHOWED CARBURETOR ICING WAS NOT PROBABLE.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.