19950923030029A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Amtr XP 503 · Mexico, MO · September 23, 1995

Date
September 23, 1995 · 18:45 local
Place
Mexico, MO
Airport
Memorial Airport
Phase of flight
Normal Cruise
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N4255Q
NTSB investigation
NTSBCHI95LA330
Reported as
Amtr XP503
Reported engine
ROTAX ROTAX582
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(.4)The pilot reported that he based his fuel calculations on the typical fuel burn of 4.5 gallons per hour. On the first leg of the flight, his calculations were accurate. He reported that on the second leg of flight, the engine quit running as a result of fuel exhaustion, less than a mile from his destination. Subsequently, the airplane was damaged during an off-airport landing. The engine was tested for fuel consumption, and in one test, it had an abnormally high fuel rate of 6.51 gallons per hour. The test also revealed fuel leaking at the pto carburetor float bowl vent. After cleaning and inspecting the needle and seat, no further abnormal fuel consumption was noted. The pilot reported that he had not tested or calibrated his fuel indicator and did not know how much fuel remained in the tank by visually checking the fuel indicator. He had decided against refueling en route based on his average fuel burn calculations.

As the FAA filed it

(.4)THE PILOT REPORTED THAT HE BASED HIS FUEL CALCULATIONS ON THE TYPICAL FUEL BURN OF 4.5 GALLONS PER HOUR. ON THE FIRST LEG OF THE FLIGHT, HIS CALCULATIONS WERE ACCURATE. HE REPORTED THAT ON THE SECOND LEG OF FLIGHT, THE ENGINE QUIT RUNNING AS A RESULT OF FUEL EXHAUSTION, LESS THAN A MILE FROM HIS DESTINATION. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE AIRPLANE WAS DAMAGED DURING AN OFF-AIRPORT LANDING. THE ENGINE WAS TESTED FOR FUEL CONSUMPTION, AND IN ONE TEST, IT HAD AN ABNORMALLY HIGH FUEL RATE OF 6.51 GALLONS PER HOUR. THE TEST ALSO REVEALED FUEL LEAKING AT THE PTO CARBURETOR FLOAT BOWL VENT. AFTER CLEANING AND INSPECTING THE NEEDLE AND SEAT, NO FURTHER ABNORMAL FUEL CONSUMPTION WAS NOTED. THE PILOT REPORTED THAT HE HAD NOT TESTED OR CALIBRATED HIS FUEL INDICATOR AND DID NOT KNOW HOW MUCH FUEL REMAINED IN THE TANK BY VISUALLY CHECKING THE FUEL INDICATOR. HE HAD DECIDED AGAINST REFUELING EN ROUTE BASED ON HIS AVERAGE FUEL BURN CALCULATIONS.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.