What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Narrative: this aircraft was the lead aircraft in a flight of two conducting simulated air combat operations. While in formation flight, this aircraft lost sight of the trail aircraft and the trail aircraft lost sight of the lead aircraft and the two aircraft contacted each other causing damage to a wing tip tank on each aircraft and minor propeller damage to the lead aircraft. Both aircraft landed safely at the north Las Vegas airport (vgt) and reported the incident. NTSB was notified and once the damage was determined, occurrence was determined to be an incident. The air combat company, desert aces, operates under a waiver for FAR 91.111(c) issued by the las FSDO on August 2, 1995. This company has also changed its standard operating procedures to not allow close formation to prevent any further occurrences recognizing that this incident could have easily been a major accident. No deviation. No violation. This incident is closed.
As the FAA filed it
NARRATIVE: THIS AIRCRAFT WAS THE LEAD AIRCRAFT IN A FLIGHT OF TWO CONDUCTING SIMULATED AIR COMBAT OPERATIONS. WHILE IN FORMATION FLIGHT, THIS AIRCRAFT LOST SIGHT OF THE TRAIL AIRCRAFT AND THE TRAIL AIRCRAFT LOST SIGHT OF THE LEAD AIRCRAFT AND THE TWO AIRCRAFT CONTACTED EACH OTHER CAUSING DAMAGE TO A WING TIP TANK ON EACH AIRCRAFT AND MINOR PROPELLER DAMAGE TO THE LEAD AIRCRAFT. BOTH AIRCRAFT LANDED SAFELY AT THE NORTH LAS VEGAS AIRPORT (VGT) AND REPORTED THE INCIDENT. NTSB WAS NOTIFIED AND ONCE THE DAMAGE WAS DETERMINED, OCCURRENCE WAS DETERMINED TO BE AN INCIDENT. THE AIR COMBAT COMPANY, DESERT ACES, OPERATES UNDER A WAIVER FOR FAR 91.111(C) ISSUED BY THE LAS FSDO ON AUGUST 2, 1995. THIS COMPANY HAS ALSO CHANGED ITS STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES TO NOT ALLOW CLOSE FORMATION TO PREVENT ANY FURTHER OCCURRENCES RECOGNIZING THAT THIS INCIDENT COULD HAVE EASILY BEEN A MAJOR ACCIDENT. NO DEVIATION. NO VIOLATION. THIS INCIDENT IS CLOSED.