19960507009569A

Accident · Substantial damage

FAA accident report · Cessna 172P · Reno, NV · May 7, 1996

Date
May 7, 1996 · 11:35 local
Place
Reno, NV
Airport
Reno/Stead Airport
Phase of flight
Final Approach
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Substantial damage
Aircraft
N5394K
NTSB investigation
NTSBLAX96LA192
Reported as
Cessna 172P
Reported engine
Lycoming O320D2J
People aboard
2
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
79 total9 in this make and model3 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Stalled and landed hard on the nosewheel. (.4)the pilot thought his aircraft was too high as he turned final, but after lowering additional flaps he allowed the aircraft to become too low and slow. When he saw the VASI lights indications he thought that the aircraft might land short. He applied 'some' power but it did not stop the aircraft from sinking. He responded by increasing back pressure in an attempt to increase his glide. He heard the stall warning horn and felt the stall buffet, but did not any more power because he thought that once the aircraft entered ground effect it would reach the runway. The aircraft stalled, landing hard short of the runway threshold. The aircraft bounced and then struck the raised threshold lip with its right main gear. It settled back on runway 26 and then slid to a stop off the right side. The approach was flown over rising terrain which can give a pilot the illusion that the aircraft is at a higher altitude. If not recognized, this illusion may induce him to maintain a higher pitch attitude resulting in a lower airspeed and an increased rate of descent during an approach.

As the FAA filed it

STALLED AND LANDED HARD ON THE NOSEWHEEL. (.4)THE PILOT THOUGHT HIS AIRCRAFT WAS TOO HIGH AS HE TURNED FINAL, BUT AFTER LOWERING ADDITIONAL FLAPS HE ALLOWED THE AIRCRAFT TO BECOME TOO LOW AND SLOW. WHEN HE SAW THE VASI LIGHTS INDICATIONS HE THOUGHT THAT THE AIRCRAFT MIGHT LAND SHORT. HE APPLIED 'SOME' POWER BUT IT DID NOT STOP THE AIRCRAFT FROM SINKING. HE RESPONDED BY INCREASING BACK PRESSURE IN AN ATTEMPT TO INCREASE HIS GLIDE. HE HEARD THE STALL WARNING HORN AND FELT THE STALL BUFFET, BUT DID NOT ANY MORE POWER BECAUSE HE THOUGHT THAT ONCE THE AIRCRAFT ENTERED GROUND EFFECT IT WOULD REACH THE RUNWAY. THE AIRCRAFT STALLED, LANDING HARD SHORT OF THE RUNWAY THRESHOLD. THE AIRCRAFT BOUNCED AND THEN STRUCK THE RAISED THRESHOLD LIP WITH ITS RIGHT MAIN GEAR. IT SETTLED BACK ON RUNWAY 26 AND THEN SLID TO A STOP OFF THE RIGHT SIDE. THE APPROACH WAS FLOWN OVER RISING TERRAIN WHICH CAN GIVE A PILOT THE ILLUSION THAT THE AIRCRAFT IS AT A HIGHER ALTITUDE. IF NOT RECOGNIZED, THIS ILLUSION MAY INDUCE HIM TO MAINTAIN A HIGHER PITCH ATTITUDE RESULTING IN A LOWER AIRSPEED AND AN INCREASED RATE OF DESCENT DURING AN APPROACH.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.