What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(.4)At night, a tail-to-tail ground collision occurred in an alleyway between an outbound united Boeing 737, N371UA, and an outbound American Boeing 767, N335AA. At the time, the B-737 was under tug control while being pushed back without the aid of wing walkers from gate number 77. The united B-767 was beginning to taxi from the same alleyway following its earlier uneventful pushback with the aid of wing walkers from gate number 63. According to the B-737'S tug driver, during pushback she had observed a nearby food service truck and had initially slowed her speed to ensure its passage. Thereafter, she continued pushing the B-737 toward the designed alleyway location. Suddenly, an impact occurred and the tug driver for the first time observed an American B-767 was already located in the alleyway. United management reported that during pushback operations it was the tug driver's responsibility to ensure that adequate clearance existed. Nine months earlier united management was aware that aircraft utilizing its gate number 77 did not have the minimum 25-foot aircraft wing tip clearance as required by the city of San Francisco. City personnel agreed to allow united gate usage p rovided united 'guarantee the use of wing walkers'.
As the FAA filed it
(.4)AT NIGHT, A TAIL-TO-TAIL GROUND COLLISION OCCURRED IN AN ALLEYWAY BETWEEN AN OUTBOUND UNITED BOEING 737, N371UA, AND AN OUTBOUND AMERICAN BOEING 767, N335AA. AT THE TIME, THE B-737 WAS UNDER TUG CONTROL WHILE BEING PUSHED BACK WITHOUT THE AID OF WING WALKERS FROM GATE NUMBER 77. THE UNITED B-767 WAS BEGINNING TO TAXI FROM THE SAME ALLEYWAY FOLLOWING ITS EARLIER UNEVENTFUL PUSHBACK WITH THE AID OF WING WALKERS FROM GATE NUMBER 63. ACCORDING TO THE B-737'S TUG DRIVER, DURING PUSHBACK SHE HAD OBSERVED A NEARBY FOOD SERVICE TRUCK AND HAD INITIALLY SLOWED HER SPEED TO ENSURE ITS PASSAGE. THEREAFTER, SHE CONTINUED PUSHING THE B-737 TOWARD THE DESIGNED ALLEYWAY LOCATION. SUDDENLY, AN IMPACT OCCURRED AND THE TUG DRIVER FOR THE FIRST TIME OBSERVED AN AMERICAN B-767 WAS ALREADY LOCATED IN THE ALLEYWAY. UNITED MANAGEMENT REPORTED THAT DURING PUSHBACK OPERATIONS IT WAS THE TUG DRIVER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT ADEQUATE CLEARANCE EXISTED. NINE MONTHS EARLIER UNITED MANAGEMENT WAS AWARE THAT AIRCRAFT UTILIZING ITS GATE NUMBER 77 DID NOT HAVE THE MINIMUM 25-FOOT AIRCRAFT WING TIP CLEARANCE AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO. CITY PERSONNEL AGREED TO ALLOW UNITED GATE USAGE P ROVIDED UNITED 'GUARANTEE THE USE OF WING WALKERS'.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other aircraft in the event · 1
Each aircraft in a collision has its own report.
Other reports on N335AA · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.