19960626019219I

Incident · Minor damage

FAA incident report · Univar A2ALON · Hallsville, IL · June 26, 1996

Date
June 26, 1996 · 08:15 local
Place
Hallsville, IL
Phase of flight
Roll-Out (Fixed Wing)
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Minor damage
Aircraft
N6503Q
Reported as
Univar A2ALON
Fatal injuries
0
Pilot’s flight hours
386 total250 in this make and model4 in the last 90 days

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

Narrative: on June 26, 1996, N3503Q, an alon 415-A2 aircraft, piloted by a private pilot, received minor damage after the nose gear partially collapsed at the hooterville rla, near Hallsville, IL. There were no injuries. The pilot stated that braking was almost nil due to the wet grass. The nose gear began to collapse after making a turn onto the taxiway. The pilot was clearly aware of the factors involved in this incident. He was cognizant of his possible options and made a decision based on the amount of runway remaining and obstructions that would have been in his flight path had he initiated a go-around from his position on the runway. His competence is not in question.

As the FAA filed it

NARRATIVE: ON JUNE 26, 1996, N3503Q, AN ALON 415-A2 AIRCRAFT, PILOTED BY A PRIVATE PILOT, RECEIVED MINOR DAMAGE AFTER THE NOSE GEAR PARTIALLY COLLAPSED AT THE HOOTERVILLE RLA, NEAR HALLSVILLE, IL. THERE WERE NO INJURIES. THE PILOT STATED THAT BRAKING WAS ALMOST NIL DUE TO THE WET GRASS. THE NOSE GEAR BEGAN TO COLLAPSE AFTER MAKING A TURN ONTO THE TAXIWAY. THE PILOT WAS CLEARLY AWARE OF THE FACTORS INVOLVED IN THIS INCIDENT. HE WAS COGNIZANT OF HIS POSSIBLE OPTIONS AND MADE A DECISION BASED ON THE AMOUNT OF RUNWAY REMAINING AND OBSTRUCTIONS THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN IN HIS FLIGHT PATH HAD HE INITIATED A GO-AROUND FROM HIS POSITION ON THE RUNWAY. HIS COMPETENCE IS NOT IN QUESTION.