19960926030179A

Accident · Destroyed

FAA accident report · Cessna 195A · Greenville, MO · September 26, 1996

Date
September 26, 1996 · 11:30 local
Place
Greenville, MO
Phase of flight
Normal Cruise
Operating rules
General operating rules (Part 91)
Damage
Destroyed
Aircraft
N195WR
NTSB investigation
NTSBCHI96FA353
Reported as
Cessna 195A
Reported engine
JACOBS R7557
People aboard
4
Fatal injuries
4

From the FAA’s Accident/Incident Data System (AIDS), through its Aviation Safety Information Portal, as reported. The NTSB investigates accidents separately, and its record of an accident is the fuller one. The aircraft is matched to the registry by N-number and event date, checked against the reported make and model; the registry’s history has gaps, so older matches can be wrong. Compare the reported make and model.

What happened

The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.

(.4)The pilot had telephoned the jonesboro fss and was advised by the briefer 'moderate turbulence... Icing... Visibilities one to two with thunderstorms and rain.... VFR flight is not recommended.' The pilot reported 'I'm gonna file that way and then I'll go just as close as I can get and when it gets bad I'll just shut it down.' Instrument meteorological conditions, severe rain, and thunderstorms were reported by witnesses in the vicinity of the accident site. Several people reported that they heard the sound of the airplane flying overhead at 'a low altitude.' No eyewitnesses were located. The outboard nine feet of the left wing was located approximately 1/4 mile from the main wreckage. Examination of the wing spar fragments and a section of the wing from the vicinity of the left wing fracture revealed 'features typical of overstress separations. Deformation associated with the fracture in the upper and lower spar caps was indicative of a bending overstress separation in the downward direction. No fatigue cracking or other types of progressive deterioration was noted.' Examination of the wreckage revealed no other evidence of preimpact malfunction.

As the FAA filed it

(.4)THE PILOT HAD TELEPHONED THE JONESBORO FSS AND WAS ADVISED BY THE BRIEFER 'MODERATE TURBULENCE... ICING... VISIBILITIES ONE TO TWO WITH THUNDERSTORMS AND RAIN.... VFR FLIGHT IS NOT RECOMMENDED.' THE PILOT REPORTED 'I'M GONNA FILE THAT WAY AND THEN I'LL GO JUST AS CLOSE AS I CAN GET AND WHEN IT GETS BAD I'LL JUST SHUT IT DOWN.' INSTRUMENT METEOROLOGICAL CONDITIONS, SEVERE RAIN, AND THUNDERSTORMS WERE REPORTED BY WITNESSES IN THE VICINITY OF THE ACCIDENT SITE. SEVERAL PEOPLE REPORTED THAT THEY HEARD THE SOUND OF THE AIRPLANE FLYING OVERHEAD AT 'A LOW ALTITUDE.' NO EYEWITNESSES WERE LOCATED. THE OUTBOARD NINE FEET OF THE LEFT WING WAS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1/4 MILE FROM THE MAIN WRECKAGE. EXAMINATION OF THE WING SPAR FRAGMENTS AND A SECTION OF THE WING FROM THE VICINITY OF THE LEFT WING FRACTURE REVEALED 'FEATURES TYPICAL OF OVERSTRESS SEPARATIONS. DEFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH THE FRACTURE IN THE UPPER AND LOWER SPAR CAPS WAS INDICATIVE OF A BENDING OVERSTRESS SEPARATION IN THE DOWNWARD DIRECTION. NO FATIGUE CRACKING OR OTHER TYPES OF PROGRESSIVE DETERIORATION WAS NOTED.' EXAMINATION OF THE WRECKAGE REVEALED NO OTHER EVIDENCE OF PREIMPACT MALFUNCTION.

NTSB investigation

The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.