What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Ikk sector advised stq @ 2040Z that N6248Q was NORDO & non radar, 48Q called our freq leveled 61 ods, he was radar identified and continued on to C77. He was descended to 3,000 ft. to get him into VFR conditions. He was manually handed off to rfd approach control. Rfd was told that N6248Q had intermittent radio, no transponder, gear down, TAS of 130 KTS. Radio communications were transferred and verified. Investigation revealed a double alternator failure lt. alternators positive post burned off. Rt alternator broke the belt. The PIC is not at fault per instructions from AAI-200 his name is not being reported to prevent the possibility of the incident being included on his airman record.
As the FAA filed it
IKK SECTOR ADVISED STQ @ 2040Z THAT N6248Q WAS NORDO & NON RADAR, 48Q CALLED OUR FREQ LEVELED 61 ODS, HE WAS RADAR IDENTIFIED AND CONTINUED ON TO C77. HE WAS DESCENDED TO 3,000 FT. TO GET HIM INTO VFR CONDITIONS. HE WAS MANUALLY HANDED OFF TO RFD APPROACH CONTROL. RFD WAS TOLD THAT N6248Q HAD INTERMITTENT RADIO, NO TRANSPONDER, GEAR DOWN, TAS OF 130 KTS. RADIO COMMUNICATIONS WERE TRANSFERRED AND VERIFIED. INVESTIGATION REVEALED A DOUBLE ALTERNATOR FAILURE LT. ALTERNATORS POSITIVE POST BURNED OFF. RT ALTERNATOR BROKE THE BELT. THE PIC IS NOT AT FAULT PER INSTRUCTIONS FROM AAI-200 HIS NAME IS NOT BEING REPORTED TO PREVENT THE POSSIBILITY OF THE INCIDENT BEING INCLUDED ON HIS AIRMAN RECORD.