What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Narrative: on December 19, 1996, at approximately 1000 PST, paul t. wilkerson landed N6194F, a Cessna 210J, at the Fallbrook, California airport (L18) and failed to extend the landing gear. The pilot indicated that he forgot to extend the landing gear and that there was no related maintenance discrepancy. Wilkerson, the sole occupant, was not injured, no fire resulted. Damage to the aircraft involved the lower fuselage skin, engine sudden stoppage, and the propeller. Damage was considered minor. This incident was coordinated with the NTSB and the western pacific region duty officer. An on site maintenance facility determined that the landing gear system and warning horn functioned normally. The pilot stated that he feels a contributing factor involved an occurrence that he previously had at this airport when he was orally admonished by the airport manager for using the opposing runway 18, which caused him to over fly a private golf course. He indicated that he was concentrating too much on this and not on his landing. The pilot also indicated that the landing gear warning horn is not wired to transmit through his headset. This incident was referred to the operations unit and to the office spm, privacy data omitted this incident did not involve a near mid air collision or a pilot deviation.
As the FAA filed it
NARRATIVE: ON DECEMBER 19, 1996, AT APPROXIMATELY 1000 PST, PAUL T. WILKERSON LANDED N6194F, A CESSNA 210J, AT THE FALLBROOK, CALIFORNIA AIRPORT (L18) AND FAILED TO EXTEND THE LANDING GEAR. THE PILOT INDICATED THAT HE FORGOT TO EXTEND THE LANDING GEAR AND THAT THERE WAS NO RELATED MAINTENANCE DISCREPANCY. WILKERSON, THE SOLE OCCUPANT, WAS NOT INJURED, NO FIRE RESULTED. DAMAGE TO THE AIRCRAFT INVOLVED THE LOWER FUSELAGE SKIN, ENGINE SUDDEN STOPPAGE, AND THE PROPELLER. DAMAGE WAS CONSIDERED MINOR. THIS INCIDENT WAS COORDINATED WITH THE NTSB AND THE WESTERN PACIFIC REGION DUTY OFFICER. AN ON SITE MAINTENANCE FACILITY DETERMINED THAT THE LANDING GEAR SYSTEM AND WARNING HORN FUNCTIONED NORMALLY. THE PILOT STATED THAT HE FEELS A CONTRIBUTING FACTOR INVOLVED AN OCCURRENCE THAT HE PREVIOUSLY HAD AT THIS AIRPORT WHEN HE WAS ORALLY ADMONISHED BY THE AIRPORT MANAGER FOR USING THE OPPOSING RUNWAY 18, WHICH CAUSED HIM TO OVER FLY A PRIVATE GOLF COURSE. HE INDICATED THAT HE WAS CONCENTRATING TOO MUCH ON THIS AND NOT ON HIS LANDING. THE PILOT ALSO INDICATED THAT THE LANDING GEAR WARNING HORN IS NOT WIRED TO TRANSMIT THROUGH HIS HEADSET. THIS INCIDENT WAS REFERRED TO THE OPERATIONS UNIT AND TO THE OFFICE SPM, ^PRIVACY DATA OMITTED^ THIS INCIDENT DID NOT INVOLVE A NEAR MID AIR COLLISION OR A PILOT DEVIATION.