What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
Aircraft was in touch and go pattern, pilot declared emergency, cleared to land on any runway, crashed short. (.4)before the first of several legs of flight, the pilot used a wooden stick to confirm the fuel quantity, since one of the fuel gauges was inoperative. He then departed, performed airwork, and continued to a landmark, where a flyby was performed. The pilot landed at an airport, remained a short time, then during the preflight, he noted that the fuel quantity indicated about 1/2. The flight departed, and the pilot flew to another airport, and performed a full stop landing with taxiback. He then departed on a return flight to the original departure airport, where he performed two touch-and-go landings. During the takeoff roll of the third touch-and-go, the pilot noted that the engine was not producing full power; however, with insufficient runway remaining to stop, he elected to continue. About 200 feet above ground level, the engine coughed, then the propeller stopped. Subsequently, the airplane collided with concrete blocks during a forced landing. The pilot stated to a police officer that he believed the engine quit because he ran out of fuel. Postcrash examination of the airplane by an FAA inspector revealed 3.0 gallons of fuel remaining in the fuel tanks. According to the airplane type certificate data sheet, the unusable fuel quantity was 3.5 gallons. Following recovery of the airplane, the engine was started, and it operated to 750 RPM. Impact damage precluded operating the engine to a higher RPM.
As the FAA filed it
AIRCRAFT WAS IN TOUCH AND GO PATTERN, PILOT DECLARED EMERGENCY, CLEARED TO LAND ON ANY RUNWAY, CRASHED SHORT. (.4)BEFORE THE FIRST OF SEVERAL LEGS OF FLIGHT, THE PILOT USED A WOODEN STICK TO CONFIRM THE FUEL QUANTITY, SINCE ONE OF THE FUEL GAUGES WAS INOPERATIVE. HE THEN DEPARTED, PERFORMED AIRWORK, AND CONTINUED TO A LANDMARK, WHERE A FLYBY WAS PERFORMED. THE PILOT LANDED AT AN AIRPORT, REMAINED A SHORT TIME, THEN DURING THE PREFLIGHT, HE NOTED THAT THE FUEL QUANTITY INDICATED ABOUT 1/2. THE FLIGHT DEPARTED, AND THE PILOT FLEW TO ANOTHER AIRPORT, AND PERFORMED A FULL STOP LANDING WITH TAXIBACK. HE THEN DEPARTED ON A RETURN FLIGHT TO THE ORIGINAL DEPARTURE AIRPORT, WHERE HE PERFORMED TWO TOUCH-AND-GO LANDINGS. DURING THE TAKEOFF ROLL OF THE THIRD TOUCH-AND-GO, THE PILOT NOTED THAT THE ENGINE WAS NOT PRODUCING FULL POWER; HOWEVER, WITH INSUFFICIENT RUNWAY REMAINING TO STOP, HE ELECTED TO CONTINUE. ABOUT 200 FEET ABOVE GROUND LEVEL, THE ENGINE COUGHED, THEN THE PROPELLER STOPPED. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE AIRPLANE COLLIDED WITH CONCRETE BLOCKS DURING A FORCED LANDING. THE PILOT STATED TO A POLICE OFFICER THAT HE BELIEVED THE ENGINE QUIT BECAUSE HE RAN OUT OF FUEL. POSTCRASH EXAMINATION OF THE AIRPLANE BY AN FAA INSPECTOR REVEALED 3.0 GALLONS OF FUEL REMAINING IN THE FUEL TANKS. ACCORDING TO THE AIRPLANE TYPE CERTIFICATE DATA SHEET, THE UNUSABLE FUEL QUANTITY WAS 3.5 GALLONS. FOLLOWING RECOVERY OF THE AIRPLANE, THE ENGINE WAS STARTED, AND IT OPERATED TO 750 RPM. IMPACT DAMAGE PRECLUDED OPERATING THE ENGINE TO A HIGHER RPM.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N5813G · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.