What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(.4) The pilot was in a commercial helicopter pilot upgrade training program. He was not yet rated for helicopters, but did hold an instructor's endorsement granting helicopter solo privileges. At the time of the accident, he was aborting a practice landing in wind conditions which were conducive to an unanticipated right yaw (also known as loss of tail rotor effectiveness, or lte) event. As he completed a turn to downwind, the helicopter made an uncommanded right turn. Despite the application of left pedal and forward cyclic by the pilot, the helicopter 'continued to rotate violently until impact on the left side.' FAA inspectors, who examined the helicopter at the accident site, reported that they found no evidence of a mechanical malfunction; they stated that the tail rotor system was intact.
As the FAA filed it
(.4) THE PILOT WAS IN A COMMERCIAL HELICOPTER PILOT UPGRADE TRAINING PROGRAM. HE WAS NOT YET RATED FOR HELICOPTERS, BUT DID HOLD AN INSTRUCTOR'S ENDORSEMENT GRANTING HELICOPTER SOLO PRIVILEGES. AT THE TIME OF THE ACCIDENT, HE WAS ABORTING A PRACTICE LANDING IN WIND CONDITIONS WHICH WERE CONDUCIVE TO AN UNANTICIPATED RIGHT YAW (ALSO KNOWN AS LOSS OF TAIL ROTOR EFFECTIVENESS, OR LTE) EVENT. AS HE COMPLETED A TURN TO DOWNWIND, THE HELICOPTER MADE AN UNCOMMANDED RIGHT TURN. DESPITE THE APPLICATION OF LEFT PEDAL AND FORWARD CYCLIC BY THE PILOT, THE HELICOPTER 'CONTINUED TO ROTATE VIOLENTLY UNTIL IMPACT ON THE LEFT SIDE.' FAA INSPECTORS, WHO EXAMINED THE HELICOPTER AT THE ACCIDENT SITE, REPORTED THAT THEY FOUND NO EVIDENCE OF A MECHANICAL MALFUNCTION; THEY STATED THAT THE TAIL ROTOR SYSTEM WAS INTACT.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.