What happened
The FAA’s narrative, in sentence case. The FAA writes it in capitals and removes private details.
(-16) Airman competency: pilot was navigating under VFR conditions using a wac chart, not a sectional chart. Wac charts do not have contour lines. He thought he could fly through a "saddle", but was 300' too low. Tried to climb, but terrain climbed faster.
As the FAA filed it
(-16) AIRMAN COMPETENCY: PILOT WAS NAVIGATING UNDER VFR CONDITIONS USING A WAC CHART, NOT A SECTIONAL CHART. WAC CHARTS DO NOT HAVE CONTOUR LINES. HE THOUGHT HE COULD FLY THROUGH A "SADDLE", BUT WAS 300' TOO LOW. TRIED TO CLIMB, BUT TERRAIN CLIMBED FASTER.
NTSB investigation
The NTSB’s investigation of this event, with its probable cause and findings. Matched to this report by N-number and date.
Other reports on N179DD · 1
Matched to the same aircraft by N-number and date.